MNZGamerX
Full Member
- Dec 12, 2023
- 142
- 85
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
International community celebrated the historic vote, but questions remain about the practical impact of the resolution
The United Nations General Assembly voted in favour of a nonbinding resolution that was put forward by the Palestinian Authority demanding that Israel end its “unlawful presence” in Gaza and the West Bank within a year.
The resolution, which was based on the July advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), also demands the withdrawal of all Israeli forces and the removal of Israeli settlers from the occupied Palestinian territories.
One hundred and twenty-four countries voted in favour of the resolution at UN headquarters in New York City, while 14 countries voted against it, including Israel and the United States. The 43 countries that abstained include US allies Australia, Canada, Germany, and Ukraine.
Pro-Palestinian social media accounts like the Palestinian-led Boycott, Sanctions and Divestment (BDS) movement immediately celebrated the passing of the resolution, viewing it as an affirmation that "the historic ruling by the ICJ triggers the legal obligation of all states to end complicity in Israel's illegal occupation and apartheid regime".
Many social media users acknowledged that the resolution is nonbinding but still deem the results as a testament to Israel’s “increasing isolation” in the international community.
Others are more hopeful about the outcome and see this as the “beginning of the end” of Israel’s occupation.
In contrast, many social media users have expressed frustration with the lack of impact that institutions like the ICJ or the UN have had in the course of Israel’s war on Gaza.
Palestinian human rights lawyer Noura Erakat acknowledged this frustration and the potential damage that it has on the entire institution of international law.
“On the same day, UN experts warn that the entire international order is at risk of crumbling for the systemic disregard for international law and regulation regarding the question of Palestine.”
The United Nations General Assembly voted in favour of a nonbinding resolution that was put forward by the Palestinian Authority demanding that Israel end its “unlawful presence” in Gaza and the West Bank within a year.
The resolution, which was based on the July advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), also demands the withdrawal of all Israeli forces and the removal of Israeli settlers from the occupied Palestinian territories.
One hundred and twenty-four countries voted in favour of the resolution at UN headquarters in New York City, while 14 countries voted against it, including Israel and the United States. The 43 countries that abstained include US allies Australia, Canada, Germany, and Ukraine.
Pro-Palestinian social media accounts like the Palestinian-led Boycott, Sanctions and Divestment (BDS) movement immediately celebrated the passing of the resolution, viewing it as an affirmation that "the historic ruling by the ICJ triggers the legal obligation of all states to end complicity in Israel's illegal occupation and apartheid regime".
Many social media users acknowledged that the resolution is nonbinding but still deem the results as a testament to Israel’s “increasing isolation” in the international community.
Others are more hopeful about the outcome and see this as the “beginning of the end” of Israel’s occupation.
In contrast, many social media users have expressed frustration with the lack of impact that institutions like the ICJ or the UN have had in the course of Israel’s war on Gaza.
Palestinian human rights lawyer Noura Erakat acknowledged this frustration and the potential damage that it has on the entire institution of international law.
“On the same day, UN experts warn that the entire international order is at risk of crumbling for the systemic disregard for international law and regulation regarding the question of Palestine.”
