BrahMos: Greek Experts Pitch Indo-Russian Supersonic Cruise Missile To Checkmate S-400 Armed Turkey

[MMM-E]

500+ km 300-ER air launched supersonic Ballistic Missile ( mach 4 ) with TV seeker to hit Warships


-- The 300-ER uses a standard solid-fuel rocket motor which is much cheaper to mass-produce ... ( the BRAHMOS is 5x more expensive )

F-16 Fighter Jet can launch four 300 ER missiles simultaneously for swarm attack


-- The 300-ER Missile utilizes a TV Camera seeker for terminal precision to bypass GPS - Radar jamming


another Turkish Missile to pose a great threat to Greece , France , India , Israel


The Indians are boasting a lot about their BRAHMOS missile, but Turkiye is entering the game with very different and deadly missiles.

If we give these missiles ( TAYFUN Block3/4 and 300-ER ) to Pakistan, they will pose a major threat to the Indian Navy.

 

[Corax]

500+ km 300-ER air launched supersonic Ballistic Missile ( mach 4 ) with TV seeker to hit Warships


-- The 300-ER uses a standard solid-fuel rocket motor which is much cheaper to mass-produce ... ( the BRAHMOS is 5x more expensive )

F-16 Fighter Jet can launch four 300 ER missiles simultaneously for swarm attack


-- The 300-ER Missile utilizes a TV Camera seeker for terminal precision to bypass GPS - Radar jamming


another Turkish Missile to pose a great threat to Greece , France , India , Israel
View attachment 205168

The Indians are boasting a lot about their BRAHMOS missile, but Turkiye is entering the game with very different and deadly missiles.

If we give these missiles ( TAYFUN Block3/4 and 300-ER ) to Pakistan, they will pose a major threat to the Indian Navy.

The TAYFUN Block 3/4 would be a significant counter to the IN, I've been advocating for an anti-ship ballistic missile for Pakistan.

 

[Corax]

The missile has a common ancestor, that is B-611. Yes Turks have modified, upgraded and certified a much more modern system but aerodynamic design is still largely unchanged.

Rather like how your brahmos is a cheap indian copy of the Soviet era P800 Oniks I guess.

 

[CallSignMaverick]

Rather like how your brahmos is a cheap indian copy of the Soviet era P800 Oniks I guess.

Correct analogy would've been Akash vis-a-vis the 2K12, not BrahMos/Oniks.

 

[Corax]

Correct analogy would've been Akash vis-a-vis the 2K12, not BrahMos/Oniks.

Ah yes, thanks for reminding, the akash is also a cheap indian Soviet copy, much like the brahmos.

 

[Afif]

where do you get it sir, I didn't find any link/ source to prove it, I would be thankful if you give a me link/source of his sir, thanks in advance

The Iskander-M and Iskander-K: A Technical Profile

Russia’s Iskander ballistic missile system is a crucial part of its modern arsenal. This article provides an overview of its features and its impact on present-day conflicts.

share.google

There are fairly accurate open source simulations available also as Iskander rocket motor's propellant size, Isp, thrust to weight ratios etc are well known.

 

[CallSignMaverick]

Ah yes, thanks for reminding, the akash is also a cheap indian Soviet copy, much like the brahmos.

Grapes are sour... except Akash is pretty old and newer variants already exist that are a lot more modern. Same goes for BrahMos, pretty old but far from being outdated while we have our own hypersonic cruise missile under D&D.

As far as cheap copies goes, welp that's ironically all your stuff named after afghan warlords carrying atmi bumm, more so due to lack of indigenous industrial depth and capability

 

[Corax]

Grapes are sour... except Akash is pretty old and newer variants already exist that are a lot more modern. Same goes for BrahMos, pretty old but far from being outdated while we have our own hypersonic cruise missile under D&D.

As far as cheap copies goes, welp that's ironically all your stuff named after afghan warlords carrying atmi bumm, more so due to lack of indigenous industrial depth and capability

Rather like your Russian/Soviet technology derived missiles carrying the names of defeated hindu leaders? You have a history of buying Russian/Soviet tech and painting it saffron, and preaching to others?!

 

[CallSignMaverick]

Rather like your Russian/Soviet technology derived missiles carrying the names of defeated hindu leaders? You have a history of buying Russian/Soviet tech and painting it saffron, and preaching to others?!

Didn't knew having indigenous propulsion, airframe, avionics and all is mere painting saffron

Stop being a troll derailing the thread with your never ending copes.

 

[Corax]

Didn't knew having indigenous propulsion, airframe, avionics and all is mere painting saffron

Stop being a troll derailing the thread with your never ending copes.

"indigenous" as far as copying goes I guess

 

[CallSignMaverick]

"indigenous" as far as copying goes I guess

That's not how you spell "coping". Rather tell us what exactly is a copy inside the system. BrahMos is a joint-venture and not some reverse engineered stuff, even inside that everything except the LFRJ was gradually replaced with Indian subsystems. Even Akash went from having imported seekers to Indian ones in 1S variant to much advanced NG versions.

Meanwhile some are too incompetent to even copy and iterate and prefer importing CKD kits for local assembly to call it indigenous.

 

[RescueRanger]

Guys, please get back on topic, I don't wish to delete posts or lock the thread.

Thanks.

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

Grapes are sour... except Akash is pretty old and newer variants already exist that are a lot more modern. Same goes for BrahMos, pretty old but far from being outdated while we have our own hypersonic cruise missile under D&D.

As far as cheap copies goes, welp that's ironically all your stuff named after afghan warlords carrying atmi bumm, more so due to lack of indigenous industrial depth and capability

If your brahmouse is that super than why your partner Russia is not using it in their navy and coastal defense batteries ? a similar question asked by lot of trolling Indians about JF-17 and why China didn't induct JF-17 into PLAAF

 

[CallSignMaverick]

If your brahmouse is that super than why your partner Russia is using it in their navy and coastal defense batteries ? a similar question asked by lot of trolling Indians about JF-17 and why China didn't induct JF-17 into PLAAF

Because BrahMos-A was developed exclusively inside India. The entire wind tunnel testing of the missile along with the design, manufacture, testing and certification of the launcher apart from airframe modifications on Su-30 MKI happened inside India.

JF-17 is not a missile, and China being a huge country probably doesn't need lightweight aircrafts with limited endurance in this day and age. Obviously the reason why it operates 1000+ heavy weight fighters and remaining as medium weight. So kept it as an export project.

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

Because BrahMos-A was developed exclusively inside India. The entire wind tunnel testing of the missile along with the design, manufacture, testing and certification of the launcher apart from airframe modifications on Su-30 MKI happened inside India.

JF-17 is not a missile, and China being a huge country probably doesn't need lightweight aircrafts with limited endurance in this day and age. Obviously the reason why it operates 1000+ heavy weight fighters and remaining as medium weight. So kept it as an export project.

lpl what coping and hoping you have to save your humiliation lpl