Central Asia Seeks New Trade Route to Pakistani Ports

[Asfandyar Bhittani]

Updated: Jul 28, 2026, 1:00 PM CD

Uzbekistan appears to be hedging its bets when it comes to Afghanistan’s ability to serve as a trade corridor.

Over the past year, Tashkent has ramped up its engagement with Afghanistan, setting an ambitious target of almost tripling annual bilateral trade volume over the next few years. Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev also recently stated that the government was “actively working” with the Taliban leadership to create a trans-Afghan rail route to speed the flow of Uzbek goods to Pakistani seaports.

But according to Pakistani media reports, Tashkent and Islamabad have reached a provisional agreement to boost bilateral trade via routes that bypass Afghanistan and traverse China.

A trans-Afghan trade corridor would be the most efficient way for goods to move from Central Asia to Pakistan. Plans to develop the route, however, have been clouded by a deep freeze in Afghan-Pakistani relations, which has prompted Islamabad to close its main land border crossings, halting truck-borne trade.

Uzbekistan and Pakistan plan to sign a protocol that formalizes the expansion of trans-China trade soon, according to Pakistani sources. “The protocol is aimed at expanding transit options and ensuring uninterrupted movement of goods between the two countries despite evolving regional security challenges,” a Pakistan outlet called Profit quoted an unnamed official source as saying.

Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and China are presently constructing a railway that would link into China’s rail network, opening access to Pakistani ports. But that project is years away from completion. For the immediate future, any Uzbek-Pakistani protocol would likely cover truck-borne trade via China.

Uzbekistan is not the only Central Asian state interested in the trans-China option. Earlier this year, Kyrgyzstan successfully tested an overland route to Pakistan via China. And in early July, Kyrgyzstan and Pakistan announced an intention to forge a strategic partnership.

By Eurasianet

 

[Asfandyar Bhittani]

It's good to hear that Pakistan has essentially walked out on Afghan transit rail. And I hope we also officially pull out of TAPI which will not only provide more expensive gas compared to current sources but also grant an hostile state a chokehold on Pakistan's energy. There is also the fact that even in best case scenario of that chokehold, the enemy state will be making 200 million dollars from Pakistan alone. I don't know what we were thinking.

It would be better if Pakistan lobbies to secure a sanctions waiver for Iranian gas instead.

 

[FuturePAF]

It's good to hear that Pakistan has essentially walked out on Afghan transit rail. And I hope we also officially pull out of TAPI which will not only provide more expensive gas compared to current sources but also grant an hostile state a chokehold on Pakistan's energy. There is also the fact that even in best case scenario of that chokehold, the enemy state will be making 200 million dollars from Pakistan alone. I don't know what we were thinking.

It would be better if Pakistan lobbies to secure a sanctions waiver for Iranian gas instead.

If TAPI is out and an Iranian gas pipeline is going to be hard to get, with the potential new regional posture of containing Iran, Pakistan should look at a Saudi-Omani-Pakistan-India pipeline; SOPI pipeline, with the underwater portion being just the muscat to Gwadar part (under 500 km, at a cost of approx. $1 billion for the underwater portion). Not only would he send oil or gas from a large and reliable producer, through stable nations, but would decrease the chances of a UAE-India pipeline through our territorial waters, and who knows what could be “attached” to that pipeline to spy on Pakistani naval activity.

Pakistan can be Saudi “open ocean oil storage facility”, considering the Iranian and Iran allied Houthis tying up two vital water ways for Saudi to get their oil and gas to market. It would also then make economic sense for Saudi to build that $10 billion state of the art modern oil refinery in Pakistan, and would also create an economically competitive petrochemical industry in Pakistan, including all adjacent industries such as pharmaceuticals, for onwards shipment to China and Central Asia via that railway as well as on to the largest growing open market in Africa.


Besides, that pipeline could be a way to then build an extension later on, all the way up to China, and earn a lot from transit trade, as well the benefits of a large volume pipeline through the length of the nation.

But if a pipeline is not built all the way to China, a railway could also do the shipment of oil or gas, so a railway could get a lot of use.

 

[hydrabadi_arab]

If TAPI is out and an Iranian gas pipeline is going to be hard to get, with the potential new regional posture of containing Iran, Pakistan should look at a Saudi-Omani-Pakistan-India pipeline; SOPI pipeline, with the underwater portion being just the muscat to Gwadar part (under 500 km, at a cost of approx. $1 billion for the underwater portion). Not only would he send oil or gas from a large and reliable producer, through stable nations, but would decrease the chances of a UAE-India pipeline through our territorial waters, and who knows what could be “attached” to that pipeline to spy on Pakistani naval activity.

Besides, that pipeline could be a way to then build an extension later on, all the way up to China, and earn a lot from transit trade, as well the benefits of a large volume pipeline through the length of the nation.

View attachment 208516

Pakistan will not have to import after shale gas come online in few years.

OGDCL to begin large-scale shale gas drilling in Sindh

ISLAMABAD: The Oil and Gas Development Company Limited (OGDCL) has decided to begin large-scale drilling operations following the discovery of significant

www.nation.com.pk