China's first Type 054B frigate commissioned

China refers to 055 as destroyer. The US refers to 055 as cruiser. Classification is not that strict. I refer to 054B as destroyer.
keep repeating same stuff again and again, you're nobody, almost in all military circles Type 54B is called Frigate
 
The displacement of 054B frigate is about 5000 tons. Speed is 30 knots.

The length of the hull is about 134 meters and the width is 15 meters.

32 VLS with thermal firing and maximum weapon caliber up to 650mm. it can launch HQ16F with a range of up to 160 km.

It uses the YJ-12A heavy supersonic anti-ship missile with a maximum range of 400-500 km, and is guided by a combined Beidou satellite guidance and terminal broadband active radar system.

the main gun is H/PJ-87 single barrel 100mm gun.

Equipped with S and X-band double-sided rotating active phased array radar.

Adopts integrated main mast and stealth design. The composite radome of the aft mast is arranged with a fast counter radar with a small double-sided shield.
 
In general, the weapon configuration of 054B is indeed at the frigate level.
It does not have the 850MM caliber large VLS that Chinese destroyers have, which can be equipped with 400km HQ-9B air defense missiles, 600KM YJ-18 anti-ship missiles, and 1500km YJ-21 hypersonic missiles.
The 650MM small caliber VLS used by 054B can only be equipped with 160KM HQ-16F air defense missiles and anti-submarine missiles, and the subsonic anti-ship missile YJ-83 is equipped with a tilted launcher.
 
The displacement of 054B frigate is about 5000 tons. Speed is 30 knots.

The length of the hull is about 134 meters and the width is 15 meters.

32 VLS with thermal firing and maximum weapon caliber up to 650mm. it can launch HQ16F with a range of up to 160 km.

It uses the YJ-12A heavy supersonic anti-ship missile with a maximum range of 400-500 km, and is guided by a combined Beidou satellite guidance and terminal broadband active radar system.

the main gun is H/PJ-87 single barrel 100mm gun.

Equipped with S and X-band double-sided rotating active phased array radar.

Adopts integrated main mast and stealth design. The composite radome of the aft mast is arranged with a fast counter radar with a small double-sided shield.

Why only 32 VLS with 5000 tons ? Should have been at least 32+16 in front and mid.
 
Why only 32 VLS with 5000 tons ? Should have been at least 32+16 in front and mid.
It's a frigate.

Its mission is simply to patrol our oceans, carry supplies to the soldiers on the islands, and escort our merchant ships. Its performance is sufficient, we need to consider cost effectiveness.

As for carrier formations and fleet duels, we have the 052DL and 055, we don't need auxiliary warships like the 054B.
 
It's a frigate.

Its mission is simply to patrol our oceans, carry supplies to the soldiers on the islands, and escort our merchant ships. Its performance is sufficient, we need to consider cost effectiveness.

As for carrier formations and fleet duels, we have the 052DL and 055, we don't need auxiliary warships like the 054B.

Don't mind me saying but the role you described can be fulfilled by a fridge with 3500-4000 tonnage as well. Why expand the length and tonnage of Type-54A if it was not meant to increase its teeth's to bite. ?
 
because the chinese dint have a compact enough vls theyre huge
again spilling bs here, Type 052D with 6000 tons displacement having 64 VLS, and what about those western huge frigate, you have zero knowledge about Chinese defence equipment, let alone their roles and desgin philosophy, just pure China bad bad.
 
again spilling bs here, Type 052D with 6000 tons displacement having 64 VLS, and what about those western huge frigate, you have zero knowledge about Chinese defence equipment, let alone their roles and desgin philosophy, just pure China bad bad.
do you have a compact vls available ?
 
Why only 32 VLS with 5000 tons ? Should have been at least 32+16 in front and mid.
because the chinese dint have a compact enough vls theyre huge
You rushed out for conclusion by saying we can't put more vls on a 5k tons ship because the vls are too big, and then I have just given you an example to counter your claim, a type 052d with 6k tons displacement has 64 VLS.

Now stop arguing for the sack of arguing and do the simple math.
 
You rushed out for conclusion by saying we can't put more vls on a 5k tons ship because the vls are too big, and then I have just given you an example to counter your claim, a type 052d with 6k tons displacement has 64 VLS.

Now stop arguing for the sack of arguing and do the simple math.
so displacement=deck space? he asked why there wasnt extra vls amidships- what relevance does displacement have to this?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top