Chinese 6th Generation Aircraft News & Discussions

How? Please explain.
Do not seeing the pictures of both? They are tailless designs needs totally different flight control software/avionics and for the J36 it has three engines so flight control software/avionics and engine control avionics are much much more complex than J20 and T/W and lift to drag ratio is also totally different from J20 because they are bigger and wider than J-20 lol
 
Do not seeing the pictures of both? They are tailless designs needs totally different flight control software/avionics and for the J36 it has three engines so flight control software/avionics and engine control avionics are much much more complex than J20 and T/W and lift to drag ratio is also totally different from J20 because they are bigger and wider than J-20 lol

Tailless is not inherently more complex than tailed. The first cars were electric cars but never caught on. Electric cars are simpler than gas cars. Tailless planes have been made in WW2. Ho 229 for example.
 
Do not seeing the pictures of both? They are tailless designs needs totally different flight control software/avionics and for the J36 it has three engines so flight control software/avionics and engine control avionics are much much more complex than J20 and T/W and lift to drag ratio is also totally different from J20 because they are bigger and wider than J-20 lol
Before developing the J-20, China only had experience in developing the J-10. The J-10C that shot down the Rafale did not make its first flight until 2013. When the J-20 made its first flight, its radar engine was still under development. The difficulty of developing the J-20 was no less than that of the current J-36/50.
 
Both J-36 and J-50 are using the modified version of the WS-15 by judging the sound of the engines.

The WS-15 is already becoming mature on the platform of the J-20, and it can just expedite the deployment of the J-36 and J-50.

And after 2030, both J-36 and J-50 will upgrade its WS-15 into the VC engine.

And around 2035, we will see the prototypes of the 7th gen aircrafts from China.
 
Tailless is not inherently more complex than tailed. The first cars were electric cars but never caught on. Electric cars are simpler than gas cars. Tailless planes have been made in WW2. Ho 229 for example.
and you develop tailless design in world war 2? and do be stupid tailless designs are muc much more complex than tailed designed, you need to write whole new software codes for flight control avionics, central of gravity and center of pressure are totally different from tailed design lol
 
Before developing the J-20, China only had experience in developing the J-10. The J-10C that shot down the Rafale did not make its first flight until 2013. When the J-20 made its first flight, its radar engine was still under development. The difficulty of developing the J-20 was no less than that of the current J-36/50.
but its your first MANNED tailless designs, needs lots of works (more works than developing J-20) is needed
 
but its your first MANNED tailless designs, needs lots of works (more works than developing J-20) is needed
There is a translation misunderstanding between you and liuzhengdong. liuzhengdong misunderstood you, he was actually explaining that because of China's technological weaknesses at the time, the J-20 encountered more difficulties during its development than the J-50 does now. What you mean is that the J-50 is more technically complex. You are arguing in completely different directions.
 
There is a translation misunderstanding between you and liuzhengdong. liuzhengdong misunderstood you, he was actually explaining that because of China's technological weaknesses at the time, the J-20 encountered more difficulties during its development than the J-50 does now. What you mean is that the J-50 is more technically complex. You are arguing in completely different directions.
It’s not about translation, it’s about thinking. Chinese thinking is different from Western thinking.
 
There is a translation misunderstanding between you and liuzhengdong. liuzhengdong misunderstood you, he was actually explaining that because of China's technological weaknesses at the time, the J-20 encountered more difficulties during its development than the J-50 does now. What you mean is that the J-50 is more technically complex. You are arguing in completely different directions.
Tailless design vs tailed design, that's a major differences
 
Tailless design vs tailed design, that's a major differences
Please do tell me what's the more difficult design TAILLESS VS TAILED?

The tailless design is certainly more complex, but his words in Chinese are not meant to compare the technical complexity of the two at all, but rather the difficulties encountered in the process. For example, a math problem in calculus is certainly more complex than a math problem in trigonometry. But if you compare a college student facing a calculus problem with an elementary school student facing a trigonometry problem, the latter is definitely more difficult.
 
The tailless design is certainly more complex, but his words in Chinese are not meant to compare the technical complexity of the two at all, but rather the difficulties encountered in the process. For example, a math problem in calculus is certainly more complex than a math problem in trigonometry. But if you compare a college student facing a calculus problem with an elementary school student facing a trigonometry problem, the latter is definitely more difficult.

Good point. J-50 / 36 compared to J-20 is a much smaller jump compared to between J-20 and J-10. Just like learning to run is a much smaller jump than learning to walk.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top