Chinese 6th Generation Aircraft News & Discussions

I also think the two planes are meant for different purposes.

SAC is as a purely fighter plane whereas the CAC is more of a fighter-bomber type.

This does not look like a competition where the two bureas will be aiming to be the sole winner of the contract for whatever criteria was set for a single aircraft.
 
I don't think that's a fighter in the conventional sense given its size, the wing configuration, the twin seats, and the large hefty undercarriage. Seems like a fighter bomber, or possible EW platform. The other option is given the 3 engines, a high altitude high speed strike aircraft designed to launch hypersonic stand off weapons. I suspect this will have a large weapons bay.
Yes, a bomber that is faster than a fighter, a bomber equipped with dual thrust vectoring nozzles, a bomber that can dogfight with fighters.
 
Last edited:
Lol. Dude chill out I know you're excited with a chub by this revealing but as far as funding US military has a whole classified budget.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

US has been flying classified aircraft for decades that have never been made public so just chill with the whole chino chest thumping and just enjoy it

See, a B21 with a maximum speed of Mach 0.9
 
We can't say for sure it's less stealthy as we've barely seen anything, and only from an extreme distance. Also, stealth isn't the only consideration.
yes sir, one thing for sure SAC design prototype's wings reminds me early wing design of British Tempest
 
Maybe after j-35,PAF will upgrade their fleet with the Shenyang design 10-15years from now
 
Well, the distinction between strike and air-superiority is getting less and less important nowadays. As it has good VLO, range, payload and supercruise it will perform strike and air-superiority mission equally well.

In fact I'd say China needs medium long range VLO strike platform more than another air-superiority platform.
The weapons bay is said to be about 6 meters long. Long enough for the PL-17.

Source is a very knowledgeable Russian puppet, but he holds a military rank ;)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
So this video we got yesterday was indeed the SAC model...


1000004342.jpg
 
Quick question, I've been reading there's a third 6th gen by Xi'an. I know they're making a stealth bomber, could it be that, or is it completely new?
 
The weapons bay is said to be about 6 meters long. Long enough for the PL-17.

Source is a very knowledgeable Russian puppet, but he holds a military rank ;)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

He's not a Russian puppet, he's generally pro-Ukrainian and while he's been wrong plenty of times, he's also very knowledgeable.

I dont pay attention to his verses series, but his analysis of military assets of various nations (including this 6th gen) tends to be very accurate.
 
Quick question, I've been reading there's a third 6th gen by Xi'an. I know they're making a stealth bomber, could it be that, or is it completely new?
Xian is working on the H20, it is unlikely for a company without the pass experience of designing a fighter to suddenly come up with a sixth gen program.
 
Possible side by side cockpit it's very likely a strike aircraft with BVR air to air capability which is good since you get away from a one role type of aircraft like J-20 and J-35.

However this is a just a demonstrator and a prototype is likely years away.
 
View attachment 90910

And the US was flying tailless aircraft…almost 30 years ago.

There’s really nothing novel about this design and the fact it needs 3 engines indicates major turbine issues. High maintenance, high costs, reduced payload etc
Typical old rant that we have seen since the frist flight of J20, you are working pretty hard, it's ok, boi, pass the bill in the congress first, touch some grass and leaves us.
 
View attachment 90910

And the US was flying tailless aircraft…almost 30 years ago.

There’s really nothing novel about this design and the fact it needs 3 engines indicates major turbine issues. High maintenance, high costs, reduced payload etc
It's going to be interesting to see if the chinese "6th gen" prototype will look anywhere near the demonstrator.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top