Chinese 6th Generation Aircraft News & Discussions

you don't what is your talking about, lol, J-36 is not flying wing design, you have 0% knowledge about military aviation lol, J-36 is a double delta wing design not flying wing design, and google flying wing design then you knows what's called flying wing design lol

No, you dont know what you are denying about 😆

Do you know what flying wing in the first place? google it if you dont know.
Read some literature about concept of flying wing and the j-36 design to comprehend it.

And yes, J-36 can be considered "flying wing" as it fit most of the criteria.
 
Last edited:
you don't what is your talking about, lol, J-36 is not flying wing design, you have 0% knowledge about military aviation lol, J-36 is a double delta wing design not flying wing design, and google flying wing design then you knows what's called flying wing design lol

LOL. You're only embarrassing yourself by showing you don't understand what a flying wing is—especially since you brought it up all by yourself while boasting yourself as if an expert. 😂

Educate yourself:

And tell me why J-36 doesnt fall into flying wing catagory?

Some clue for the clueless:
1748962266457.png

&


:LOL:
 
Last edited:
No, you dont know what you are denying about 😆

Do you know what flying wing in the first place? google it if you dont know.
Read some literature about concept of flying wing and the j-36 design to comprehend it.

And yes, J-36 can be considered "flying wing" as it fit most of the criteria.
lol what the fcuk,, more stupidness by you, J-36 and a flying wing, are you 2 year toddler?
 
LOL. You're only embarrassing yourself by showing you don't understand what a flying wing is—especially since you brought it up all by yourself while boasting yourself as if an expert. 😂

Educate yourself:

And tell me why J-36 doesnt fall into flying wing catagory?

Some clue for the clueless:
View attachment 125595

&


:LOL:
lol click bait source not from reputable/respectable defense websites sources like Jane's defense weekly/flight global/ aviation weekly etc etc lol
 
lol click bait source not from reputable/respectable defense websites sources like Jane's defense weekly/flight global/ aviation weekly etc etc lol


I still haven't seen yet your explanation why J-36 doesnt fit "flying wing design". Or could you give us credible resource supporting your claim that J-36 is not qualified as "flying wing" design?

Otherwise your claim is baseless, and the sources i gave above that you said not reputable are still much much much more credible by far than your baseless claim from thin air.
 
Last edited:
Definition of Flying Wing
A flying wing is a tailless fixed-wing aircraft that has no definite fuselage, with its crew, payload, fuel, and equipment housed inside the main wing structure.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_wing

Does J-36 fall into that catagory?
While it doesn’t strictly meet the textbook definition of a pure flying wing (i.e. an aircraft with no fuselage at all), it’s still reasonable to call it a “flying wing” in a broader sense, because it merges the main wing with the fuselage and carries most systems internally - features that align with the spirit of flying wing design.

So, yes it can be considered a flying wing, especially in modern contexts where “flying wing” has evolved to include advanced stealthy designs with integrated fuselages and no distinct tails.

More sources supporting that J-36 is "flying wing" design:

1748972958459.png

-----

1748973009898.png
-----

1748973131455.png
-----

1748973270700.png

So why do you think J-36 is not flying wing design? @NGAD IS THE BEST @gambit ? any source refuting that?
 
Y
I still haven't seen yet your explanation why J-36 doesnt fit "flying wing design". Or could you give us credible resource supporting your claim that J-36 is not qualified as "flying wing" design?

Otherwise your claim is baseless, and the sources i gave above that you said not reputable are still much much much more credible by far than your baseless claim from thin air.
You're justB cc 2 and year old toddler and nothing else flying wing designs has no nose cone like conventional fighters but J36 has a nose cone similar to J-20/J35 and all Chinese 4.5th gen jets

Flying wing designs have any traditional nose cone, First read your article you posted on your above post of Wikipedia on flying wing design then talk

Sorry dude your mental disability has no cure
 
Why not?

I am still waiting your explanation why it is not.

So far you can only deny without any explanation at all.
Flying wing designs has no nose cone like conventional fighters but J36 has

Do read flying wing design article on Wikipedia you posted above your post then spew nonsense and crap
 
Definition of Flying Wing
A flying wing is a tailless fixed-wing aircraft that has no definite fuselage, with its crew, payload, fuel, and equipment housed inside the main wing structure.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_wing

Does J-36 fall into that catagory?
While it doesn’t strictly meet the textbook definition of a pure flying wing (i.e. an aircraft with no fuselage at all), it’s still reasonable to call it a “flying wing” in a broader sense, because it merges the main wing with the fuselage and carries most systems internally - features that align with the spirit of flying wing design.

So, yes it can be considered a flying wing, especially in modern contexts where “flying wing” has evolved to include advanced stealthy designs with integrated fuselages and no distinct tails.

More sources supporting that J-36 is "flying wing" design:

View attachment 125639

-----

View attachment 125640
-----

View attachment 125641
-----

View attachment 125642

So why do you think J-36 is not flying wing design? @NGAD IS THE BEST @gambit ? any source refuting that?
Ok ww2 era American P-51 Mastang was also flying wing design now happy now shoo, get a hike kid
 
I still haven't seen yet your explanation why J-36 doesnt fit "flying wing design". Or could you give us credible resource supporting your claim that J-36 is not qualified as "flying wing" design?

Otherwise your claim is baseless, and the sources i gave above that you said not reputable are still much much much more credible by far than your baseless claim from thin air.
Because the J-36 does not even LOOK like a wing.
 
Flying wing designs has no nose cone like conventional fighters but J36 has

Do read flying wing design article on Wikipedia you posted above your post then spew nonsense and crap


Haven't I explained above that J-36 is flying wing in "broader sense"? why failed to grasp.

No, the J-36 does not have a conventional nose in the way you might think of the rounded or conical nose on a fighter jet with a distinct fuselage.

For your further self education, this should be objective for you as it is not coming from my mouth:

1749050384498.png

and

1749050253216.png

and

1749050096735.png

Apology I have no choice other than posting answer from AI in order to crack stubbornness.

So the nonsense and crap is your own blabbering without adequate understanding. 😆
 
Ok ww2 era American P-51 Mastang was also flying wing design now happy now shoo, get a hike kid


Actually, the World War II era American P-51 Mustang was not a flying wing design. It was a conventional fighter aircraft with a distinct fuselage, wings, and tail.

Flying wing designs, like the Northrop B-2 Spirit J-36 we were discussing, lack a traditional fuselage and have their crew, payload, and fuel housed within the wing structure. The P-51 Mustang has a clearly defined fuselage that houses the cockpit and engine, with wings extending from it.

Thats why, you need to understand the concept of "flying wing" in the first place.
 
Because the J-36 does not even LOOK like a wing.

Doesn't look like a wing for whom? it is yes for me. LOL

Engineering is based on objective matters, not what seems right to someone :LOL:


Y
You're justB cc 2 and year old toddler and nothing else flying wing designs has no nose cone like conventional fighters but J36 has a nose cone similar to J-20/J35 and all Chinese 4.5th gen jets

Flying wing designs have any traditional nose cone, First read your article you posted on your above post of Wikipedia on flying wing design then talk

Sorry dude your mental disability has no cure

The old toddler with mental disability is the one who refute without proper understanding while ignoring numerous facts given.

While J-36 has no traditional nose cone as you think, you haven't given any source supporting your claim which has been asked several times before.
 
The old toddler with mental disability is the one who refute without proper understanding while ignoring numerous facts given.

While J-36 has no traditional nose cone as you think, you haven't given any source supporting your claim which has been asked several times before.
You know what is you talking about, Can i show the Pic of J-36 which has traditionally Stealth optimized nose cone lol
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top