I just saw it streaming down the river this morning. My colleagues were all shouting. I am still not impressed until I see a nuke carrier but this is a great achievement.
Too much of a risk France tried to do it before their nuclear reactor matured by using a string of nuclear reactors originally designed for submarines and They had headaches with teething problems. Plus Fujian's intended operation is most likely West Pacific or South China Sea within the protection of the Chinese land-based jet. I have no doubt the next iteration of type 004 will be nuclearI'm really surprised this isn't nuclear powered given the extensive experience the Chinese have with nuclear powered naval vessels. I get the whole iterative approach to design evolution, but they could have skipped a conventionally powered AC of this size, especially given its significant power requirements given the EMALs.
Too much cutting edge technology, such as electromagnetic catapults, integrated masts Used on the Fujian , it is estimated that the next aircraft carrier will be nuclear powered.I'm really surprised this isn't nuclear powered given the extensive experience the Chinese have with nuclear powered naval vessels. I get the whole iterative approach to design evolution, but they could have skipped a conventionally powered AC of this size, especially given its significant power requirements given the EMALs.
Anyone doubt? China's ability to build nuclear power ships read this
Why not I don't see any problem Russia had a fleet of nuclear icebreaker ships for a long time and they travel all over the worldIt's a weird design and I don't think most ports would be willing to let a nuclear powered cargo ship in
This is just a PPT so far and may never actually be built
the total cost will go down as more and more carriers will be built. How many are planned and how many are under construction?A lot of new technology is being developed for the Fujian, many of which are at the cutting edge of naval aviation and new to China. This includes the electromagnetic catapult system, integrated power system, the J-35 fifth generation carrier-based fighter, the KJ-600 carrier AWAC etc. A nuclear carrier is also much more expensive than a conventional one. Putting everything together, there is a lot of risk with building a nuclear ship. With all these new technologies, it is best to start conservative and build in nuclear propulsion with future vessels.
This is to say nothing of factors like China's relative need for a nuclear-powered carrier given its strategic posture, and how perceptions of the risk environment and timing of future conflict would permit a nuclear ship to become combat ready in time, given it will take longer to build.
That is building cost per unit. The operation cost would only go up as it takes on active duties.the total cost will go down as more and more carriers will be built. How many are planned and how many are under construction?