Chinese ground war fighting capacity is based on industrial capacity

Don't troll, you clearly said that on very first page of this thread you jester

You must have been smoking some good shjt before logging jn

But I don't have time for your delusional nonsense. Please quote the exact post where I claimed India would launch ICBMs at China and China will not retaliate.

Provide the evidence, or stop putting words in my mouth.

Your inability to distinguish what I actually said from what you wish I'd said is not my problem.
 
A humble message to the Indians boasting on here...

China has been preparing for a direct confrontation with the hyper-power military of the United States of America and NATO in one package, alone.

India has at best maintained parity with the armed forces of Pakistan, let alone the giant, technologically advanced, educated, space leader, ship building leader, minerals leader, batteries leader, research leader, exports leader, manufacturing leader, and soon to be a hyper power, Peoples Republic of China on top of being an ally to Pakistan which on its own has been enough to keep Bharat Moota at bay.

It would be best to maintain these delusions against a tiny, economically dead Pakistan, than even have the audacity to bat an eye at ever-growing China.

You will be blown to oblivion, forever, no exaggeration.
 
When did China become a leader in space?
The United States maintains an overall lead in space technology—largely driven by commercial powerhouses like SpaceX—though China has closed the gap significantly and leads in select areas such as Earth observation, satellite navigation, and lunar far-side exploration. [1, 2, 3]

Where the United States Leads
  • Reusable Launch Vehicles: American private companies, particularly SpaceX, dominate heavy-lift and rapid-cadence reusable rockets (such as Falcon 9 and Starship), allowing the U.S. to place the vast majority of global mass into orbit at a lower cost per kilogram. [1, 2]
  • Commercial Satellite Constellations: The U.S. leads in massive low-Earth orbit (LEO) broadband networks, anchored by operations like Starlink. [1, 2]
  • Deep Space & Heavy Lifting: NASA’s Artemis architecture and deep-space science payloads continue to set benchmarks in interplanetary exploration, despite timeline and budget challenges. [1]

Where China Leads or Matches the U.S.
  • Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT): China’s Beidou satellite navigation system and its remote-sensing/Earth-observation networks have surpassed or matched U.S. capabilities in certain technical metrics and high-cadence imaging. [1, 2]
  • Lunar Exploration: China’s Chang’e program has executed a flawless series of lunar missions, including the historic first landing and sample return from the far side of the moon (Chang'e 6). [1, 2]
  • Space Stations: China operates the modern, modular Tiangong space station independently, while the aging International Space Station (ISS) faces retirement around 2030. [1, 2, 3]
  • Rapid Catch-up in Reusable Rockets: Chinese commercial firms like LandSpace have begun successfully testing and landing rocket boosters, signaling that China is rapidly closing the last major hardware gap in reusable launch systems.
 
When did China become a leader in space?
Just conveniently ignored everything else. NASA is down in the gutter as of now.
The industrial base of Chine can give them lead in not too long.
Only a matter of time now.

Just don't have your inherent biases and look at it from a practical point of view.
 
Just conveniently ignored everything else. NASA is down in the gutter as of now.
The industrial base of Chine can give them lead in not too long.
Only a matter of time now.

Just don't have your inherent biases and look at it from a practical point of view.
Can you show where I conveniently ignored everything else? I chose one item. You were kind enough to support my premise that while China has certainly made inroads, they are not yet the leader in space.

Thank you for that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top