Chinese PLAAF News

[Hendarto]

air is overated. Whether its ukraine or when China pushed the US out of North Korea without a single plane.

Exactly if we learn anything from the Ukro-Russo war air supremacy is a myth. Both sides can't maintain air supremacy because of the effectiveness of IAD. Surface-to-air missiles are so potent these days that they use the attack plane as a platform to launch cruise missiles or glide bombs. The border between India and Tibet is also heavily guarded by Chinese radar that can see further since they are on the high ground. Building an air base close to the border is a dumb idea because they were first hit by the artillery rocket and surface-to-surface missile when the s** hit the fan. China's main air base is way set back in Xinjiang (Hotan and Golmud) and Sichuan

 

[guangdongt]

The Indian military airports that pose a real threat to our side in the eastern section of the China India border are actually Chabuya and Tispel. The Chabuya and Tishipur Air Force Bases were both built during World War II and served as important material transfer stations on the Allied aid to China camel hump route. The former is about 350 kilometers north of the actual control line in the eastern section, while the latter is only 170 kilometers away from the actual control line.
It has to be said that these two airports are troublesome for our country. Su-30 МКИ The fighter jet has an internal oil combat radius of approximately 1500 kilometers, and when carrying the PJ-10 BrahMos cruise missile, it can ideally threaten targets within a radius of nearly 2000 kilometers. Even if not immediately launched after takeoff, it can still pose a certain threat to the Sichuan Tibet Highway.
However, considering the actual terrain, the altitude of these two airports is a bit unbearable. The altitude of Tispel is only 73 meters. Taking off from such an altitude, in order to launch a flying missile to attack targets within China, even without considering the curvature of the Earth, the carrier aircraft must climb to an altitude of at least 8000 meters in order to conduct effective searches. And this process will inevitably be detected by our radar station. At the same time, due to the trajectory characteristics of the flying missile itself, our side can also obtain sufficient warning time and organize interception.

 

[guangdongt]

The Indian side has introduced the MQ-9B Reaper attack drone produced by the United States and the Heron Egret reconnaissance drone produced by Israel. "Low slow small" targets and stealth drone targets often pose a huge challenge to the army's field air defense. Although we often watch various news analyses in India, they like to boast. However, we have never relaxed our guard against them from the military to civilians, and we have always been in a defensive position at the border

I watch Indian military programs, and these videos rarely have solid military theory and basic knowledge. Propaganda has replaced the rigor that military science popularization itself should possess. The following message is full of various compliments. It's quite good to just watch it as a news report

 

[Joe Shearer]

Is this typical Indian accent?

No, probably Singaporean.

 

[Joe Shearer]

I watch Indian military programs, and these videos rarely have solid military theory and basic knowledge. Propaganda has replaced the rigor that military science popularization itself should possess. The following message is full of various compliments. It's quite good to just watch it as a news report

Look upon this as an opportunity.

With a little hard work, you could be the definitive Indian expert on military affairs on social media.

Millions.

Think about it.

 

[sutton9999]

India shall remember the timing - 1962 Cuba missile crisis
That is all that matters.

 

[Joe Shearer]

India shall remember the timing - 1962 Cuba missile crisis
That is all that matters.

You KNOW about that!

 

[DF-41]

What a joke that India concerned of China not sustaining 24x7 CAP over Tibet.

As if that will matter.
When India within 10 minutes of outright war with China that India not have any airbases or runways to fly their fighters off from

To refresh your memory
==================================================

Where will be the bases American planes be taking off from with all those ordnance?


More likely than not, the air and naval bases on Japan and Okinanwa and Guam will all be taken out in 10 minutes .
AND CRUISE MISSILES BE SEND EVERY HOUR TO TAKE OUT ASSETS NOT TAKEN OUT IN FIRST STRIKE AND TO PREVENT REPAIRS

First Strike: China's Missile Threat to U.S. Bases in Asia​

China 'has prepared for pre-emptive strike against US military bases'​

An investigation of satellite imagery compares China’s missile testing grounds and US military bases show a pattern - all of the missile tests have been aimed at destroying US carriers in East Asia.

www.dailymail.co.uk

In addition to Sun Tze Art of War, Chinese got another book to guide them by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty-Six_Stratagems

Chapter 4: Mixed Warfare Stratagems (混戰計, Hùnzhàn jì)​

Remove the firewood from under the pot (釜底抽薪, Fǔ dǐ chōu xīn)​

Take out the leading argument or asset of someone; "steal someone's thunder". This is the essence of the indirect approach: instead of attacking enemy's fighting forces, direct attacks against their ability to wage war. Literally, take the fuel out of the fire.
AND WHY ALL BASES America CAN USE AND NEED TO USE WILL BE TOTALLY DESTROYED FIRST

And American carriers within the 2nd island chain be hit by multiple AShCMs and from DFs

==================================================​

Just like the air & naval bases in Japan Okinawa Guam Diego Garcia, air bases in India will be fragments of memories within 10 minutes of outright war with CHina.

Most of them can be taken out by simple Chinese Firedragons .

India need not worry or be concerned China unable to sustain 24x7 cap over Tibet.

AND NEITHER CAN INDIA BE ABLE TO SUSTAIN 24X7 CAP OVER ALL OF INDIA AS WELL

Instead of worrying over things out of control of India, India should do more worthwhile pursuits such as giving herself the ability to manufacture assault rifles and howitzers and simple bullets.
None of those nonsence game changer gimmicks India so fond of.

 

[Bengal71]

Indians should try to avoid any war with China, you will be mauled badly.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Indians should try to avoid any war with China, you will be mauled badly.

Possibly China intends to wage war. We will still be mauled badly, and be unable to avoid losses. On top of everything else, we will have tried, and will have failed to avoid war.

 

[guangdongt]

Indians should try to avoid any war with China, you will be mauled badly.

So I say they are too false. In reality, China has always been a defensive posture towards India's deployment on the border, and the real border threat is India. They have always wanted to find opportunities to change the status quo. Looking at the discussions among the Indians in this forum, we also know what their inner thoughts are, such as wanting China to disintegrate at any moment. Of course, the reasons are grandiose

 

[Bengal71]

Possibly China intends to wage war. We will still be mauled badly, and be unable to avoid losses. On top of everything else, we will have tried, and will have failed to avoid war.

Well, I am not sure who is the more pacifist one between the two, I think it's the Chinese honestly. I just don't think a China-India large war has good prospect for the Indians, but won't be too severe in the scale of damage for the Chinese. I hope both countries avoid war.

Besides, I see the geopolitical reality of this region (and largely the non-western countries) with a different prism. The westerners have colonized almost all of the eastern countries for 100s of years and even now maintain some degree of colonialism through different means. They are the chief beneficiaries of that and we are the losers. All eastern countries need to break free of that and rise and develop. If there is problem between eastern countries, it must not be allowed to be instigated by the west; if it is, it's just another version of their old "divide and rule" doctrine. We should not be that stupid.

 

[Joe Shearer]

So I say they are too false. In reality, China has always been a defensive posture towards India's deployment on the border, and the real border threat is India. They have always wanted to find opportunities to change the status quo. Looking at the discussions among the Indians in this forum, we also know what their inner thoughts are, such as wanting China to disintegrate at any moment. Of course, the reasons are grandiose

How can that be, when China is in Tibet? A defensive posture would have kept the PLA in Gansu, Qing Hai and Szechuan.

As far as the inner thoughts of Indians on this forum are concerned, this is far from a representative group of Indians. Drawing from the thoughts and sentiments expressed by them is laughable. The fact remains; China is present far from its ethnic centre, in a land that was considered alien to the empire even as late as the Ming Dynasty, and that was doctrinally brought into the scope of the imperial rule only under an exceptionally aggressive Qing Emperor.

So let us not deal in the false coin of China's peaceful intentions. It has none.

 

[guangdongt]

How can that be, when China is in Tibet? A defensive posture would have kept the PLA in Gansu, Qing Hai and Szechuan.

As far as the inner thoughts of Indians on this forum are concerned, this is far from a representative group of Indians. Drawing from the thoughts and sentiments expressed by them is laughable. The fact remains; China is present far from its ethnic centre, in a land that was considered alien to the empire even as late as the Ming Dynasty, and that was doctrinally brought into the scope of the imperial rule only under an exceptionally aggressive Qing Emperor.

So let us not deal in the false coin of China's peaceful intentions. It has none.

So this is your unrealistic attitude: always covet Xizang for various reasons. Go ahead. I don't know how many Indian natives you can represent. After so long, you are still living in a dream of conquest that even the British Empire has not realized. Wake up, buddy, you are first and foremost an Indian

 

[Joe Shearer]

So this is your unrealistic attitude: always covet Xizang for various reasons. Go ahead. I don't know how many Indian natives you can represent. After so long, you are still living in a dream of conquest that even the British Empire has not realized. Wake up, buddy, you are first and foremost an Indian

Nobody covets Xijang.

India recognised Chinese suzerainty over Tibet in 1959, so all the huffing and puffing on Internet is worth nothing. There is no dream of conquest, my post only pointed out that China was far away from its ethnic centre.

In typical Chinese fashion, you have converted that denial of legitimacy into a rival claim for domination, and that reminder of your origins into an aggressive stand. The world is used to these infantile postures and gestures.