Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know it serves the purpose but the carrier uncannily resembles a coffin.PLA exercise: using drones to transport wounded soldiers on the battlefield
View attachment 88423
View attachment 88424
View attachment 88430
View attachment 88427
View attachment 88428
View attachment 88431


I agree with you. I think there are some additions that need to be made, but that's beyond the scope of this thread. So, that's it.
1, We are discussing a topic about PLA weapon systems which can only be based on PLA's strategic tactics. Similarly, it is not appropriate to analyze the US military with the case of drones in the Russian-Ukrainian theater. ------ Special Forces and PAP tactical discussions are out of scope.
2, We are discussing the direct cost of use, excluding platform cost and support cost. If these costs were to be included, it would be impossible to calculate. Do you also need to consider the cost of the communication system of the swarm UCAV?
3, The 625E is based on the Pantsir s1 shell close air defense system and the Chinese ship mounted CIWS. the Chinese ship mounted CIWS can intercept supersonic armored targets. Here are the rounds it comes with and you can judge the 625E's capabilities based on those.
View attachment 73185
As for whether it defends against SDB, I'm not sure. But, the SDB launch platform would first need to be exposed to our air defense missiles.
Offensive and defensive systems, always evolve in an upward spiral, and, surely, the offensive system comes first, and then the corresponding defensive system emerges. In actual combat, passive defense is one of the means for tactical needs, and offense is the best defense.
The core issue of our discussion is “using Swarm UCAV to defend against Swarm UCAV”. On this issue, I am against it.
Swarm UCAV is better suited for offense than defense. Of course, if we apply the previous point “offense is the best defense”, I have to agree. If the Swarm UCAV is simply used to build a defense grid over our key targets to ward off enemy Swarm UCAVs, I am strongly opposed to this approach.
@nang2 @Michael @DeinoThere is no way you can use traditional way to counter swarm uav. It's just a matter of ROI.
You enemy can use millions of small UAV in the same time in future, but you can't never counter millions of small UAV no matter how many laser system and 625 you have.
UAV are cheaper and cheaper day after day, while 625 cost is fixed(plus inflation).
Something new is needed, it could be swarm to counter swarm, or not. But if you stick to traditional air defense system, there is no way out.
Last but not least, you have to consider the system cost, including full life cycle cost, otherwise, the ROI discussion is meaningless.
625 upper limit is low, 25mm calibar means short range. 6 means you can shoot thousands of bullets per minute at most.
25mm*6 means you can shoot down targets with 2-3 mach speed in 1-2km range. That's the upper limit. Realy combat effectiveness usually be even lower, much lower.
SDB is covered by armor, laser system is useless in this case basically. You have to use APFSDS to penetrate those target(cost goes up). Even though, due to 25mm caliber, SDB is too fast, and too close to you, the kinetic energy will make enough damage unless SDB was hit and exploded in the air.
SDB is high speed target, while 625 can only shoot target in 1-2km, the 625 system can shoot 1-2 SDB at most. Your enemy can offload tens of them, 625 system is doomed in a few munites.
SDB launch platform can be anything in future, UAV or F-35. That's out of discussion here. Completely different topic.
These self-published media have very little credibility. They are not worth exploring in depth.The US Naval Postgraduate School believes that the only thing that can deal with swarm drones in future war will be another group of drones, and has carried out research on multi-target tracking in drone swarm confrontation.
For example, cluster drones carry fishing nets to capture another group of drones; Set up a net wall in the air to capture drones; Carry offensive weapons to destroy opposing drones; Take the way of suicide attack and the other side of the drone physical collision, so that it loses the combat ability.
集群无人机探测及对抗措施综述
2.3 集群无人机对抗
随着无人机自主能力的不断提高和智能集群技术的发展,软杀伤和硬杀伤措施对无人机集群的限制效果将变得有限(例如无人机群分布范围很分散或利用高大建筑物躲避反制)。美国海军研究生院认为未来战争中唯一能对付集群无人机的将是另一群无人机[2],并开展了无人机集群对抗中的多目标跟踪研究。
例如采用集群无人机携带渔网的方式,对另一群无人机进行捕获;在空中布设网墙,对无人机进行捕获;携带进攻武器对对方无人机进行摧毁;采取自杀式袭击的方式和对方无人机进行物理碰撞,使其丧失作战能力等[12]。
3 结束语
随着无人机的小型化、智能化及智能集群技术快速发展,无人机集群的反制措施难度越来越高。如微小型无人机会增加探测跟踪难度;控制程序和通信链路的升级会增加网络攻击和射频干扰的难度[13-15]。无人机集群由于其变革性的战场应用前景,受到越来越多国家的关注和研究。本文对无人机集群的预警探测及较为有效的反制措施做了初步探讨,为对抗敌方无人机集群威胁提供了一定的参考。
![]()
@nang2 @Michael @Deino
We will see.These self-published media have very little credibility. They are not worth exploring in depth.
I did see an official video once. A cluster UAS developed by a Chinese military industrial complex for export, which can be used against swarm drones. But the primary mission of these clustered UAS is still to perform offensive missions.
Their cluster UAS, however, does not fit your point.
1, These UAV's are larger, measuring around 1 meter. Larger payloads and longer ranges. They are out of the swarm drone convention.
2, They attack by firing cluster munitions or carrying electronic jamming equipment, not in direct impact mode. They fly at lower speeds than FPVs.
Precisely, this is a descending strike. These guys make medium sized UAVs into cluster UAS.




We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.