Covid-19 News and Discussions

Yommie

Elite Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
63,855
Reaction score
37,179
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
While it is true WHO has ended the state of emergency for covid, the virus persists in the community and, along with other respiratory viruses, pose a challenge to the healthcare system, especially to children, the elderly, the immunocompromised. So this thread will track the prevalence and spread of covid and its many variants and subvariants. This thread will track new vaccines and treatments should they become available.
 
Source:
N/A
Last edited:

As COVID surge wanes, California faces backlash over ‘outrageous’ new rules
By Aidin VaziriJan 26, 2024


The winter wave of respiratory viruses in California is steadily receding, with hospital admissions for COVID-19 and flu falling back to levels seen before Christmas.

Stephen Lam/The Chronicle 2023

The expected winter wave of respiratory viruses in California is steadily receding, with hospital admissions for COVID-19 and influenza falling back to levels seen before Christmas, according to figures reported by the state Friday. Health facilities and the public have fared much better this winter compared with the previous three seasons of the pandemic.
Yet amid the substantial decline in serious illnesses and deaths, critics are concerned that a new state policy easing isolation recommendations for people exposed to or infected with the coronavirus could potentially reverse the progress.
There have indeed been significant improvements in several key metrics, including a 53% reduction since the start of the year in weekly emergency department visits nationwide attributed to the “tripledemic” of COVID-19, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus.

In California, COVID-19 hospital admissions have fallen to an average of 419 per day, down 27% from their peak on Jan. 3, according to the latest health department data.
Over the past week, an average of 2,332 people have been in the hospital each day with COVID-19 in the state, down from nearly 2,800 at the start of the year. California’s test positivity rate has fallen to 10.6% from a recent peak of 12.3% just after Jan. 1.
Though more than 1,700 Americans are still dying each week from the virus, that figure is much lower than it was during the first winter wave in 2021, before vaccines were widely available, when approximately 26,000 people died in the third week of January. Last year, weekly deaths peaked at just over 3,600 during the same period.
Wastewater samples from around the Bay Area also signal reduced coronavirus levels in local sewage, aside from a couple of hot spots in San Francisco and Napa.
Set against this backdrop of encouraging trends, the state’s new COVID-19 guidelines are meant to reflect diminished risk to the public. Rolled out this month, the revised policy from the California Department of Public Health significantly reduces the recommended isolation period for infected individuals.

Californians with mild and improving symptoms can return to work or school after being fever-free for just 24 hours, although they’re advised to continue masking and to maintain distance from individuals at high risk for severe illness for 10 days. Individuals with no evident symptoms are no longer required to undergo isolation.
The state’s move has sparked substantial concerns and discussions among experts and the public, with some worried it could lead to an increase in infections.

Guidance faces backlash: ‘It is outrageous’
California is the first state to diverge from guidelines established by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which still advocate for a minimum of five days of isolation after initially testing positive for the coronavirus or experiencing symptoms.
The California Department of Public Health justifies the change, stating that the state is now at “a different point in time with reduced impacts from COVID-19” due to broad immunity from vaccination and natural infection, along with readily available treatments for infected individuals.

“Previous isolation recommendations were implemented to reduce the spread of a virus to which the population had little immunity and had led to large numbers of hospitalizations and deaths that overwhelmed our health care systems during the pandemic.”
The agency declined to elaborate on the science behind its decision, which has drawn condemnation from some infectious diseases specialists.
Dr. Michael Mina, an epidemiologist and former assistant professor of epidemiology at Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, is among those expressing strong criticism, stating that the guidance “essentially encourages” infectious people to return to work and school, potentially spreading the virus to others.
“It is outrageous,” he said in a social media post.
Mina emphasized the importance of rapid tests over relying solely on fever as an indicator of infectiousness. He also underscored the need to balance societal limitations with mitigating the spread of the disease, endorsing the CDC’s five-day rule.

“We no longer live in a world where we have to guess on this issue,” Mina wrote. “We have very simple and increasingly affordable diagnostics that can provide people (including school nurses and the like) to see what used to be invisible and thus not put others at risk.”
The concerns raised extend beyond immediate infection risks. Experts such as Dr. Steven Deeks, a professor of medicine at UCSF, highlighted the lingering threat of long COVID.
“Long COVID is real and although all the signs suggest it is less common now than it was back in the beginning, it has not gone away,” Deeks said. “This needs to be part of the discussion as to when and how to relax guidance around masking and returning to work or school.”
Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, also of UCSF, said the updated recommendations were reasonable, given the high level of COVID-19 immunity now present in the community. But he cautioned that the effectiveness of the new rules also depends on individual behavior. Few people, especially children, are up to date on their vaccinations or willing to wear a mask for 10 days after testing positive for the coronavirus.
As of Jan. 13, only 21.5% of adults and 11% of children in the U.S. had received the latest updated COVID-19 vaccine, per CDC data.

New dominant variant no more severe, CDC finds
On a more positive note, early data from the CDC has found that the most prevalent variant of the coronavirus currently in circulation in the U.S. is likely no more virulent than its predecessors. The JN.1 variant is now estimated to be responsible for about 86% of COVID cases nationwide. But the CDC said this past week that there’s no evidence it causes more severe illness.
During a webinar with lab officials, the CDC’s medical epidemiologist, Dr. Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner, highlighted that the data so far indicates JN.1 — an offshoot of the BA.2.86 omicron strain — could even be less severe than previous variants. But he warned that it could still be deadly for some individuals.
“It’s important to remember that how a virus affects an individual is unique,” he said. “It could be very severe. People could die from a virus that, to the general population, may be milder.”
The CDC seeks to gather more data on this variant over the next few weeks to provide a more comprehensive risk assessment.
 
Last edited:
California health officials shorten COVID isolation period to 1 day

 

Ottawa

High COVID levels persist as other illnesses dip​

Emergency room visits in Ottawa drop for 3rd straight week​

Andrew Foote · CBC News · Posted: Jan 25, 2024 10:26 AM EST | Last Updated: January 25
People walk along a train platform.

Commuters walk along the platform at Ottawa's Rideau station in January 2023. (Matthew Kupfer/CBC)

Social Sharing​

  • Facebook
  • X
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
Recent developments:
  • Ottawa's COVID-19 numbers are generally high and stable.
  • Flu signals, while still high, are dropping again.
  • RSV trends drop to more moderate levels.
  • Nineteen more COVID deaths have been reported locally.

The latest​

Flu numbers dropped again over the last week, according to the latest data from Ottawa Public Health (OPH), and RSV trends did the same. Flu levels remain high and RSV's are more moderate.
The COVID-19 picture remains generally high and stable.
Meanwhile, both the number of respiratory-related and overall emergency room visits in the city have dropped for three straight weeks.
Experts recommend people cover coughs, wear masks, keep hands and often-touched surfaces clean; stay home when sick and keep up with COVID and flu vaccines to help protect themselves and other vulnerable people.
OPH says the city's health-care institutions remain at high risk from respiratory illnesses, as they have been since the end of August. This is expected to be the case until at least March.

In Ottawa​

Spread
There was a major adjustment to Ottawa's recent coronavirus wastewater average in the past week.
The capital hit its highest average of 2023 on New Year's Eve, then seemed to drop significantly based on last week's snapshot.
That data now suggests Ottawa hit its second-highest average and highest daily reading on record on Jan. 12.
As of Jan. 22, it had fallen slightly from that peak. It's been generally rising for more than six months.
A chart of the level of coronavirus in Ottawa's wastewater since January 2023.

Researchers have measured and shared the amount of novel coronavirus in Ottawa's wastewater since June 2020. This is the data for 2023 and 2024 up to Monday. (613covid.ca)
OPH says the wastewater signal is very high.
The weekly average test positivity rate in the city is a stable 15 per cent, which OPH still sees as high.
Hospitalizations, outbreaks and deaths
In the past week, the average number of Ottawa residents in local hospitals for COVID-19 is a stable 49.
A separate, wider count — which includes patients who tested positive for COVID after being admitted for other reasons, were admitted for lingering COVID complications or were transferred from other health units — has fallen to its lowest level since October.
A chart showing the number of people in Ottawa hospitals with COVID.

Ottawa Public Health has a COVID-19 hospital count that shows all hospital patients who tested positive for COVID, including those admitted for other reasons and who live in other areas. (Ottawa Public Health)
OPH considers the number of new COVID-related hospitalizations in the city — 43 — as high.
The active COVID outbreak count is stable at 25, mostly in long-term care or retirement homes. There is a high number of new outbreaks.
The health unit reported 264 more COVID cases and five more COVID deaths in the last week. All victims were people age 80 or above.
OPH's next vaccination update is expected Monday.
After nearly four years, OPH said it is also ending its COVID-specific dashboard next month. Its respiratory updates will continue.

Across the region​

The Kingston area's health unit says it's also in the midst of a high-risk time for respiratory illness. Its COVID-19, flu and RSV pictures are all stable: COVID and flu are at higher levels and RSV is looking lower.
The Eastern Ontario Health Unit (EOHU)'s big-picture assessment rates the overall respiratory risk as moderate and stable.
Hastings Prince Edward (HPE) Public Health, like Ottawa, gives a weekly COVID case hospital average. That has fallen again to 18. Flu activity there is seen as low.
Western Quebec has a stable 51 hospital patients who have tested positive for COVID. The province reports one more COVID death there.
HPE reported five more COVID deaths in its weekly update. The EOHU and Kingston area each reported three more and Leeds, Grenville and Lanark (LGL) counties reported two more.
LGL data goes up to Jan. 14, when its trends were generally high and dropping. Renfrew County's next update is expected later Thursday.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|About CBC News
Corrections and clarifications|Submit a news tip|Report error

RELATED STORIES​

 

New Brunswick's COVID-19 pandemic death toll reaches at least 1,000
COVID and flu killed 5 people Jan. 7-13, six children under four among 67 people hospitalized

cbc-gem.jpg

Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC · Posted: Jan 23, 2024 5:00 AM EST | Last Updated: January 23
A close-up of a COVID-19 rapid test kit and device, showing a negative result.

COVID-19 has killed 64 New Brunswickers since the beginning of the respiratory season on Aug. 27, according to the Department of Health data (Alexandre Silberman/CBC News)
Social Sharing
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
167
comments
Two more deaths from COVID-19 have pushed New Brunswick's official pandemic death toll to 1,000, although the total is likely higher since the province has counted only people who die in hospital as COVID deaths since September.
The two people who died between Jan. 7 and Jan. 13 were both aged 65 or older, according to Tuesday's Respiratory Watch report.
Public Health has reported 1,000 COVID deaths since March 2020, said Department of Health spokesperson Sean Hatchard.
"That includes 64 deaths that have been recorded during the current respiratory illness season that began on Aug. 27, 2023. The total number of COVID deaths prior to this season was 936," he said in an emailed statement.
CBC requested an interview with Dr. Yves Léger, the province's acting chief medical officer of health.
"When there is something new or noteworthy to share with the public, or if its advice or guidance for the public were to change, Public Health ensures staff are available to provide information to the media," Hatchard replied. "That may include an interview or a statement, depending on the individual situation."
Decreases in activity
COVID-19 activity in the province remains "moderate," he said, with "most indicators" decreasing throughout the reporting period.
The report also shows less influenza activity compared to the previous few weeks, said Hatchard, citing decreases in deaths, hospitalizations and cases.
"Public Health expects the viruses to continue circulating in the province throughout the respiratory illness season, and that is why it is important that individuals continue taking precautions to reduce their risk of contracting or spreading a virus," he said.
Some of these include staying up to date on vaccinations, staying home when sick, wearing a well-fitting mask in crowded places, and ensuring "good ventilation," Hatchard said.
36 COVID hospitalizations, 6 in ICU
Thirty-six people were hospitalized for or with the virus during the reporting week, which represents a 25 per cent decrease from the 48 hospitalized in the previous report.
Among those hospitalized are three children under four, two people aged 20 to 44, nine aged 45 to 64, and 22 aged 65 or older.
Six of them required intensive care, up from five.
A graphic showing each province's COVID-19 hazard index and the national average on a scale of one to 10, all with 'severe' scores illustrated in red.

The COVID-19 hazard in all jurisdictions is considered 'severe,' but New Brunswick is third highest, with a score of 22.3. (COVID-19 Resources Canada)
Fourteen COVID outbreaks have been confirmed by labs, including eight in nursing homes and six in "other facilities." A week prior there were 13 outbreaks.
The number of new COVID cases confirmed through PCR (polymerase chain reaction) lab tests has dropped by more than a third to 89, from 142. The positivity rate is seven per cent, down from nine.
A total of 136,072 COVID XBB.1.5 vaccines have been administered since Oct. 4, according to the Department of Health.
Flu kills 3
The flu killed three people between Jan. 7 and Jan. 13, all aged 65 or older. That's down from six deaths the previous week.
Hospitalizations because of the flu dropped nearly 56 per cent to 31, from 70. Four of these people required intensive care, up from three.
Among those hospitalized were three children under age four, and one youth aged five to 19. The others included three people aged 20 to 44, seven aged 45 to 64, and 17 aged 65 or older.
There were five lab-confirmed flu outbreaks, down from nine.
Two new "influenza-like illness" outbreaks were also reported in schools. No information about the schools, the number of cases or whether it's students or staff affected has been released.
School outbreaks are based on 10 per cent absenteeism in a school because of influenza-like illness symptoms, the report says.
Lab-confirmed new cases also decreased to 158, from 316. The positivity rate is now 12 per cent, down from 21 per cent.
Of these, 156 were influenza A and two were influenza B.
The latest cases raise the total number of cases since the season began on Aug. 27 to 2,009.
As of Tuesday, 206,871 New Brunswickers have been vaccinated against the flu since Oct. 4, according to the Department of Health.
Horizon sees 233% increase in COVID-positive workers
Horizon Health Network has seen a steep rise in the number of health-care workers off sick with COVID-19 in the past week, its COVID report shows. Thirty staff have tested positive with a rapid test or PCR test, as of Saturday, up from nine.
Horizon struggled with emergency department wait times and overcrowding over the holidays, due in part to staff shortages created by illness and vacancies, and a "major surge" of "very ill" patients, interim president and CEO Margaret Melanson has said.
Horizon's COVID-19 hospitalizations also increased week-over-week. It has 46 active COVID patients, up from 39, while the number of patients admitted to intensive care remains unchanged at four.
A number of Horizon hospital units have COVID outbreaks, as of Tuesday. They include:
  • Moncton Hospital — cardiac step down, orthopedics, family practice/palliative care.
  • Saint John Regional Hospital — family medicine.
Vitalité Health Network updates its COVID report only monthly, on the last Tuesday of every month.
It has not updated its COVID outbreaks page since Jan. 16, when it reported no outbreaks.
About 1 in 11 infected, says researcher
About one in 11 New Brunswickers are infected with COVID-19, according to an infectious diseases researcher and co-founder of COVID-19 Resources Canada.
Infections are roughly 31 times higher now than compared to the lowest point of the pandemic in Canada, based on wastewater data, Tara Moriarty posted on social media Sunday.
Hospitalizations are nearly 15 times higher, deaths almost 17 times higher, and long COVID cases more than 33 times higher, according to Moriarty, an associate professor at the University of Toronto.
Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, Technical Lead of the World Health Organization for COVID-19.

Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO's director of epidemic and pandemic preparedness and prevention, said COVID-19 is 'causing far too much burden when we can prevent it.' (Reuters)
New Brunswick's COVID-19 hazard index for Jan. 20 through Feb. 2 is "severe" and third highest in the country at 22.3, she said. Only Quebec and Newfoundland are higher at 24.9 and 24, respectively.
The national average is 21.2.
The six-level hazard index is calculated based on several variables, such as COVID-19 wastewater data, test positivity rates, hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions and deaths.
'Still a global health threat'
COVID-19 is "still a global health threat," according to the World Health Organization's director of epidemic and pandemic preparedness and prevention.
"The numbers of deaths have reduced drastically since its peak a couple of years ago, but we still have around 10,000 deaths per month," said Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, noting that's data from only 50 countries.

"What's difficult right now is that the virus continues to evolve," she said in a recent video post on social media. "We are two years into Omicron, we have a virus that will continue to change as we let it circulate rampantly."
In addition, "we don't necessarily know how often we're getting infected," said Van Kerkhove, an infectious disease epidemiologist.
"And our concern is in five years from now, 10 years from now, 20 years from now — what are we going to see in terms of cardiac impairment, of pulmonary impairment, of neurologic impairment? We don't know.
"We don't know everything about this virus. It's year five of the pandemic. And I know it feels a lot longer, but there's still a lot that we don't know about it."
 

COVID Map Shows States With Higher Case Rates​

Jan 29, 2024 at 5:25 AM EST

COVID Map Shows States With Higher Case Rates
By Aleks Phillips
U.S. News Reporter

States across eastern and central America, as well as the northwest, are among those that have a higher prevalence of COVID-19 infections in the most-recent recorded week, maps produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show.
Only two of the federal agency's administrative regions—covering the Plains and the southwest, as well as Hawaii—had, on average, a prevalence of antigen tests returning positive results of less than 10 percent of those taken in the week ending January 20. However, New England saw the most-elevated proportion of positive tests, figures released on Friday show.

The recent uptick in positive cases and hospitalizations with COVID-19, which now appears to be waning, is something health officials have been expecting during the winter months. Colder weather tends to lead to an increased spread of viruses and other infections as immunity is lower.
Covid test positivity map January 20

A representation of the rates of test positivity among CDC administrative regions in the week ending January 20, 2024. Yellow denotes rates between 10 and 14.9 percent, and green rates between 5 and 9.9 percent.CDC
The CDC reported that, nationwide, the prevalence was around 10.8 percent of tests undertaken—a 1.2 percent decrease from the previous recorded week. The geographic picture of where positive cases are occurring shows test positivity dropping off for many regions following the holiday period, when travel and social mixing tends to be a factor in the spread of the virus.
Elevated infections of respiratory diseases such as COVID-19 and influenza led some hospitals in states with high population densities to bring in fresh mask mandates toward the end of 2023.

The CDC does not give test positivity percentages for individual states anymore, instead giving them as an average across its administrative regions. Region Two—which includes New York and New Jersey—had an overall prevalence of 14 percent positive tests out of 4,369 taken across the two states, down a marginal 0.9 percent on the prior week.
Region One—comprised by Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont—had a test positivity rate of 12 percent out of 5,729 taken, a decrease of 2.1 percent on the previous week.

By contrast, Region Eight—which covers Colorado, the Dakotas, Montana, Utah and Wyoming—had a rate of positive tests of 8.5 percent, down a percentage point on the prior week; and Region Nine—California, Hawaii, Nevada and New Mexico—had a rate of 7.4 percent, a drop of 5 percent.
All other administrative regions had test positivity rates above 10 percent, though not as high a proportion as Regions One and Two.
The CDC said that the data did not include tests taken at home and added that the results may be subject to change due to delays in testing centers reporting back.

"The data represent laboratory tests performed, not individual people," the CDC added, as one person may be administered multiple tests in a week. The agency said that the percentage of positive tests "is one of the metrics used to monitor COVID-19 transmission over time and by area."
Meanwhile, across the U.S., hospitalizations with COVID-19 continued a three-week decline from a seasonal peak between the weeks of December 30 and January 6. Alaska and New Mexico were the only two states to see moderate increases in hospital admissions, of more than 10 percent.
 

COVID Tracker | Average daily cases fall 24%; deaths down as well​

January 23, 2024
Bridge Staff
Michigan Health Watch
Coronavirus Michigan
SHARE THIS:
Share this article on Twitter
Share this article on Facebook
Share this article on LinkedIn
Share this article via email
Print this article

Bridge Michigan
Michigan Health Watch
COVID Tracker | Average daily cases fall 24%; deaths down as well
SHARE THIS:
Share this article on Twitter
Share this article on Facebook
Share this article on LinkedIn
Share this article via email
Print this article
Donate

Last updated: Tuesday, Jan. 23, at 4:02 p.m. This post will be continuously updated with Michigan coronavirus locations and updated COVID-19 news.



For more interactive maps and charts, see the Michigan Coronavirus Dashboard, showing vaccine distribution information, case numbers, locations, deaths and demographics.
Confirmed COVID-19 cases dropped 24 percent to an average of 523 cases per day from 684 the week before, Michigan public health officials reported on Tuesday.
The state also reported 82 confirmed COVID-19 deaths, down nearly 50 percent from 156 reported the previous week.
Of the deaths, 51 occurred in December, bringing that month’s total to 279. There were 621 in December 2022. Another 24 of the deaths occurred this month.
The decline in cases comes as the number of confirmed COVID-19 hospital patients has fallen. The state’s 164 hospitals reported 788 confirmed COVID-19 patients on Monday, down from 999 a week earlier and 1,275 on Jan. 3, the peak of this winter’s surge. In past years, there have been as many as 5,000 COVID-19-positive hospital patients.
Experts say that state-confirmed cases are likely a vast undercount because many people either no longer test for the virus when they have symptoms or rely on home tests. Still, case counts are an indication of overall trends.— Mike Wilkinson

Tuesday, Jan. 16​

Deaths increase​

Michigan public health officials reported an additional 156 COVID-19 deaths on Tuesday, the most reported in a single week since November 2022.
Of those, 92 occurred in December, bringing the monthly total to 228 — the most in a month since 273 in February 2023.
Even so, the total was the lowest for the month of December since the pandemic began: There were 621 that month in 2022, compared to 3,394 in December 2021 and 3,316 in December 2020.
While more deaths could be reported in coming weeks, 2,222 COVID-19 deaths were reported in 2023, by far the lowest of the pandemic. There were 9,325 deaths in 2022, 15,004 in 2021 and 13,019 in 2020.
Related: Michigan businesses ask court to make state pay for COVID-19 losses
The increase in reported deaths followed a weeks-long increase in confirmed cases and hospitalizations that now appears to be in decline.
Confirmed cases fell 36 percent this past week to 4,785. That was the second straight week of decline. Hospitalizations, which hit 1,275 on Jan. 3, fell to 999 on Monday, the lowest since it was 962 on Dec. 20.
Of the deaths, 22 were in November and 25 in January.
Experts say that state-confirmed cases are likely a vast undercount because many people either no longer test for the virus when they have symptoms or rely on home tests. Still, case counts are an indication of overall trends.— Mike Wilkinson
 



HEALTHCARE
Oklahoma tops 20,000 COVID-19 deaths, 2nd highest death rate in the nation
Alexia Aston
The Oklahoman


Oklahoma has the second highest COVID-19 death rate in the nation as the state recently topped 20,000 COVID-19 deaths since 2020.
Here's what COVID-19 currently looks like in Oklahoma.
Which Oklahoma counties have the most COVID-19 deaths?
With 20,055 deaths, the rate of COVID-19 deaths per 100,000 people is 437.5 in the entire state, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Oklahoma County leads in total deaths with 2,668, followed by Tulsa County at 2,313 and Cleveland County at 777, according to data from The New York Times.
 

Respiratory illnesses remain 'elevated' throughout much of country: CDC
By
Brie Stimson
Published January 27, 2024 3:49PM
Health
FOX News

6782706d-
article
Getty Images
Respiratory illnesses that include a fever plus a cough or sore throat, causing people to seek medical care in the United States, have remained elevated in the last two weeks, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) said Friday.
"This week, 22 jurisdictions experienced high or very high activity compared to 37 jurisdictions two weeks ago," the agency said in an update, noting that there had been some decreases.
https://searchthese.net/index.php
While COVID-19, RSV and flu positivity rates remained elevated nationally, COVID and RSV rates decreased compared to the previous week, and flu rates stayed about the same.
THE FLU IS SOARING IN 7 US STATES AND RISING IN OTHERS, HEALTH OFFICIALS SAY

Also, visits to the emergency room for the flu, COVID and RSV have decreased as the country returns to work after gathering with family and friends for the holidays last month, spreading viruses during the height of the flu season.
Levels of COVID-19 detected in wastewater remained elevated but went down from "very high to high" and were concentrated mostly in the South, the CDC said.
States with a "very high" level of respiratory illness include New York, Tennessee, South Carolina, and Louisiana.
 

America is over the Covid vaccine.

Frantic lineups for scarce doses when Covid vaccines first became available have long since given way to widespread indifference. Each new round of boosters has drawn fewer bared arms than the round before it. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that, as of Jan. 6, a mere 21.5% of Americans aged 18 and older and 11% of children have been vaccinated with the latest Covid vaccine.



But before you write off that number as a reflection of hesitancy over vaccines overall, consider this: 46.7% of Americans aged 18 and older and 47.5% of children have been vaccinated against influenza for this cold and flu season. In older adults, who are at the greatest risk from Covid, the gap is wider still; 73% of people 65 and older have received a flu shot, but only 41% have taken the Covid booster.

Why the disparity? Americans who regularly get a flu shot are just the type of people you’d expect would routinely get vaccinated against Covid. Yet as the statistics reveal, even many of them appear to have declined the latest booster.

vaccine_rates_2
CDC
It’s not clear that a single definitive answer exists; in fact there is likely a combination of explanations, say people who study vaccine acceptance and vaccine hesitancy. They see this group as both a missed opportunity and as a cohort that could be swayed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jason Schwartz, an associate professor of health policy at the Yale School of Public Health, called people who get vaccinated against flu “the lowest hanging fruit for increasing Covid vaccine uptake.”

“These are people who are signaling right by their very actions that they are supportive of vaccines generally and that they’re supportive of the idea of an annual vaccination effort, even [with] a vaccine that is known to be less than perfect,” said Schwartz, who specializes in vaccine policy. “And the fact that those individuals are in some sense voting with their feet by … passing on Covid is a real warning sign above and beyond all the other issues these vaccination efforts face.”

The experts with whom STAT spoke about this issue expressed little surprise at the chasm between flu vaccine and Covid vaccine acceptance rates. While there are a striking number of similarities between the two vaccines — similarities health authorities might be advised to highlight more in their promotional efforts for Covid shots, some experts say — there are also intractable differences.

“I think it’s generally true that people who get flu shots are higher seekers of health care, and maybe put a greater premium on their health than people who don’t get flu shots. But … I think that the Covid vaccine is kind of in a different category,” said Sara Gorman, executive director of Those Nerdy Girls, a collective of women scientists and clinicians that formed — initially under the banner Dear Pandemic — to answer questions and dispel misinformation about Covid-19. (The group has since broadened its focus to encompass other scientific topics as well.)

NEWSLETTERSSign up for Daily Recap
All the health and medical news you need today, in one email

Privacy Policy

For starters, there’s a veneer of politics clinging to the Covid vaccine that staid old flu vaccines do not have.

“Getting a Covid vaccine has come to symbolize identity politics in a way that no other vaccine really has,” said Gorman, who is the author of the upcoming book “The Anatomy of Deception: Conspiracy Theories, Distrust, and Public Health in America.”

“It is true that people on the left tend to get more vaccines in general. But even if you are sort of somewhere in the middle, and you still want your flu shot, but getting a Covid shot would mean associating yourself with a certain political identity that’s really not palatable to you, then you’re not going to do it,” she said.

Heidi Larson, director of the Vaccine Confidence Project, agreed, noting there is clear evidence of a political divide on Covid vaccine acceptance, with vaccination rates substantially higher among Democrats than among Republicans. Flu vaccine is simply not part of a political identity in that same way.

There is also a cloud of discomfort surrounding Covid vaccinations — questions about safety and effectiveness — that doesn’t hover over the flu vaccine, Schwartz noted.

He drew a parallel between the response to Covid vaccines and to HPV vaccines after the latter were first approved in the mid-aughts. Those vaccines prevent infection with human papillomaviruses that cause cervical, penile, and other cancers — viruses that are transmitted mainly by sex.

HPV vaccines are highly effective and work best when given before adolescents become sexually active. But vaccinating preteens and teens to protect them against a sexually transmitted infection is a bridge some parents have been reluctant to cross. Schwartz said it’s not unusual to see adolescents come in for medical appointments to get recommended vaccinations and leave having gotten a tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis booster and a meningococcal vaccine but no HPV shot.

Related: After grilling Fauci on Covid origins, House Republicans want to consider new rules for foreign research
That kind of behavior is not uncommon when it comes to vaccines, Gorman said, with people agreeing to some but not others. “Most people are not in the camp of getting every single vaccine or not getting any vaccines,” she said.

Part of the unease with Covid vaccines relates to the unprecedented speed with which they were developed. Also at work, the experts said, are concerns about the messenger RNA platform used by the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. These are the first approved vaccines that deploy mRNA to teach immune systems to protect against a threat. The vaccines have been given to hundreds of millions of people; there is overwhelming evidence they are effective and safe. But the mere notion of mRNA makes some people nervous.

“It’s a different technology, the mRNA technology, which people often don’t fully understand, and I think can be afraid of [it],” Gorman said.

Anti-vaccine campaigners have leaned into those fears, attempting to link Covid vaccines to a variety of serious side effects for which there is no scientific evidence. Larson pointed to the claims that erupt on social media when high-profile figures have sudden unexplained illnesses or young athletes die unexpectedly. “There have been some pretty awful social media campaigns like the whole sudden death thing. That really scares people,” said Larson, who is a professor of anthropology and risk at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and the University of Washington at Seattle.

“Especially with Covid, that stuff really is in the air. And people do pick up on bits and pieces of it,” Gorman said.

The short-term side effects associated with the mRNA vaccines may also be contributing to reluctance. For some people, these vaccines are a breeze, but for others, a day or two of fever, aches, and chills are guaranteed to follow a booster. “We know from other vaccines that any mark in the ‘this is inconvenient for me’ column will suppress uptake,” said Malia Jones, an assistant professor of spatial dimensions of community health at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Legitimate scientific debate over how well boosters work and who needs additional shots at this point could also be fueling a sense of distrust among some individuals who are otherwise open to vaccination, the experts said. These debates aren’t happening about flu shots, which have been in routine use for decades. And it is clear some primary care providers are ambivalent about the need for additional Covid shots, and as a result may not be advocating strongly that their patients stay up to date. Study after study has shown that a firm recommendation from a trusted medical professional plays a huge role in persuading people to be vaccinated.

“I think in some cases, clinicians are not recommending them as strongly as they might for people who’ve already got … five, six, seven vaccines already,” said Jones, who personally knows some doctors who question whether another booster is necessary at this point.

Related: Respiratory viruses, thrown out of whack by Covid, appear to be falling back into seasonal order
These discussions, this ambivalence — they are not lost on people who are vacillating about whether to get a Covid shot, Schwartz said. “I think it can lead to both fatigue and confusion, saying, ‘Listen, even the experts can’t figure out sort of how to think about Covid vaccines. To hell with it.’”

He believes at this point the public undervalues Covid shots and underestimates the risk the illness presents.

“We continue to see studies showing the benefits of those additional doses in terms of the new responses and in terms of outcomes. And I think, increasingly, they seem to just sort of land with a thud. I don’t see them changing the public discourse,” Schwartz said.

Larson said people aren’t wrong to conclude that the risk from Covid has eased. Covid death rates are now, thankfully, a fraction of what they were two or three years ago. She believes the massive Omicron wave that began in late 2021 changed perceptions about Covid. The new variant was so adept at transmitting that massive numbers of people who had until then avoided Covid became infected in the early months of 2022. But the new version of the virus triggered less severe illness than the Delta variant that preceded it.

“That was like a turning point where people all of a sudden were like, ‘Oh, I think we’re out of the bad bit. It’s just like the flu, or a cold,’” Larson said. But flu isn’t benign, and furthermore, Covid is still more dangerous than flu, she noted.

In the first week of January, three-and-a-quarter times more people died from a Covid infection than from flu, according to CDC data. Drawing figures like those to the public’s attention might move some people who are on the fence, she said. “It’s not going to change the extremists’ minds.”

Larson thinks health authorities should play up the similarities between flu vaccination and Covid vaccination to appeal to more people who will take the former but not the latter. Like the fact that both vaccines have to be updated regularly because the viruses evolve. Like the fact that neither vaccine offers failsafe protection against infection, but both lower the risk of serious illness and death. Like the fact that with both flu viruses and SARS-2, immunity induced by vaccination or infection wanes, and therefore revaccination is required.

People understand these things about flu vaccine. These facts are baked into their acceptance of the need for an annual flu shot. But paradoxically, with Covid, these features seem to fuel distrust of the vaccines. People who catch flu after having a flu shot surmise they would have been sicker but for the vaccine. But if people see someone they know received a Covid booster go on to get infected, they conclude the shot isn’t worthwhile, Gorman said.

Flu vaccine has a clear advantage, thanks to the fact it’s been around for eons. People don’t really have to devote too much brain time to a decision. “It’s become normalized, become a routine,” Schwartz said.

Jones believes that that’s a big part of the problem in persuading people to get vaccinated against Covid. She has talked to parents about why their kids got a flu vaccine but not a Covid shot. “It’s just still too new,” she was told. And some of the questions people quite reasonably pose — Do we need annual shots? Does everyone need an annual shot? — can’t yet be answered. That adds to the discomfort, she said.

Jones thinks there will eventually be a standing recommendation from the CDC that everyone get a Covid shot every autumn, along the lines of the recommendations for the flu vaccine. “That would help signal to some of these folks who get an annual flu vaccine that this is on a schedule. It has to be updated every so often in order to keep our immunity fresh,” Jones said.

She and others said, however, that while there are ways to make inroads with the population of people who get annual flu shots, it’s going to take time. And even then, there will be people who will not be swayed.

“I don’t think there’s any magic fix for these things. But I do think sometimes those kinds of nudges help a bit,” said Larson. “But it’s only going to be for the people that are maybe leaning to yes but are not convinced enough.”
 

3 children among the 10 new COVID deaths reported in Alberta since last week
Data includes known deaths up to Jan. 20 but there is a lag in reporting

robson-fletcher-headshot.jpg

Robson Fletcher · CBC News · Posted: Jan 26, 2024 12:21 PM EST | Last Updated: January 26
New COVID-19 severe outcomes in the most recent Alberta Health report vs. the report from the week before. The week of the most recent report is Jan. 14 to Jan. 20, 2024.

New COVID-19 severe outcomes in the most recent Alberta Health report vs. the report from the week before. The week of the most recent report is Jan. 14 to Jan. 20, 2024. (Data via Alberta Health, table by Robson Fletcher/CBC)
Social Sharing
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
507
comments
Another 10 Albertans have died from COVID, according to the latest weekly data released by the provincial government, three of whom were children.
These mark the first pediatric deaths due to COVID reported in the current respiratory virus season.
The death toll, among all ages, for the current season now stands at 430.
Two of the children who died of COVID were between the ages of one and four years old, according to a statement from Alberta Health.
The third child, who was between the ages of five and nine, died of a co-infection of COVID and influenza.
"The deaths reported are all historic deaths that would have occurred between October and December 2023," Alberta Health spokesperson Charity Wallace said in an email.
Wallace said Alberta Health would not reveal where in the province the pediatric deaths occurred, "due to privacy concerns."
The latest release also shows an additional 103 people were hospitalized for COVID, including 11 admitted to intensive care units (ICU).
In total, there have now been 3,518 hospitalizations this season, including 216 admissions to ICU.
In general, Alberta Health noted respiratory illnesses appear to be on a downward trajectory.
"Cases of influenza and RSV have been declining in the recent weeks," Wallace said in an email last week. "Although COVID-19 saw a slight increase following the holiday season, it has been steadily declining since mid-November. Hospitalizations are following a similar, delayed trajectory downward for influenza and COVID-19.
Age breakdown and data notes
Admissions do not include patients with "incidental" cases of COVID-19 admitted to hospital/ICU for other reasons.
Alberta Health says the deaths include those "resulting from a clinically compatible illness in a lab-confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there is a clear alternative cause of death identified (e.g. trauma, poisoning, drug overdose, etc.)"
These numbers represent the difference between hospitalizations and deaths in the province's most recent weekly report compared to the report from the week before, for the 2023-24 respiratory virus tracking season.
The season runs from Aug. 27, 2023, to Aug. 24, 2024.
Older people tend to be the most vulnerable to severe outcomes from COVID, but younger people can be affected, too.
The table below breaks down the total number of hospitalizations, ICU admissions and deaths in the current respiratory-virus season, by age range.
You'll also find the population-adjusted rate (per 100,000 people) for each age range.


This data all comes from the provincial government's respiratory virus dashboard, which is updated weekly.
There are often delays in reporting, however, meaning not all deaths and hospitalizations that actually happened during the latest weekly reporting period are included.
Each weekly report typically includes severe outcomes that occurred in prior weeks but were only just added to the data.
 
Last edited:

Why don't COVID tests seem to work as well as they used to?​

  • By Jason Gale Bloomberg News (TNS)
  • Jan 22, 2024

LIFE-HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS-TESTS-GET

65a9a6eb5146d.image.jpg

A person receives a COVID-19 test on Jan. 4, 2022, in New York City.
Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images/TNS


With COVID outbreaks being whipped up for a fifth year, testing has emerged as a source of frustration once again.
Whereas obtaining a test was often difficult in early 2020, now the abundance of cheaper rapid kits in grocery stores and home medicine cabinets has led to a new concern — they don’t seem to work.
“When people tell me that their rapid antigen tests never turn positive, they’re usually talking to me because they’re frustrated,” says immunologist and epidemiologist Michael Mina.

In fact, the tests work just as well as they did when they first came out. What’s changed is how our bodies are responding to the coronavirus, leading many people to test too early, says Mina, chief science officer at digital health-care company eMed LLC, which helped implement the US government’s Home Test to Treat program a year ago.
In 2020, the loss of smell and taste, fatigue, and a dry cough heralded the start of COVID-19, usually a week after the virus entered the body. “Those first symptoms came on after the virus was tearing you apart.”
Multiple vaccinations and natural infections since then have made most people “immunologically educated,” Mina says. A growing wall of immunity has enabled the body to recognize SARS-CoV-2 faster and do a better job at suppressing it, even as the virus spawned dozens of new variants.
That means nasal congestion, fever, and other early signs of viral illness can develop within a day or two of infection during a “prodromal phase” that occurs before symptoms of the disease have fully developed, according to Mina.
“That’s just our immune system saying, Hey, I’m starting to recognize something here,” he says.
The faster immune system response led some scientists to believe that the coronavirus’s incubation period has shortened over time. But the virus’s growth kinetics have changed very little since 2020, Mina says. “It still takes the same amount of time for the virus to go from, say, 10 particles to 10 million particles.”
In 2020, health authorities recommended waiting four or five days after a coronavirus exposure to get tested, reflecting when the amount of virus in the upper airway was nearing a peak and readily detectable. But the onset of prodromal symptoms and the relative ease of home testing now mean people are screening for COVID much sooner.
“A lot of people are reaching for those tests 24-to-48 hours post-exposure,” says Mina, a former assistant professor of epidemiology, immunology, and infectious diseases at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston. “And, just like in 2020, the virus hasn’t yet grown to high levels in the nose. It really takes four, five, six days.”
Mina says “educated” immune systems are providing a kind of in-built rapid test. Instead, of indicating positivity with a new line on a test strip, the signal comes with congestion and fever.

“You might have to wait an extra day or two before you can run that confirmatory rapid antigen test after your ‘immune test’ has already started to signal that there’s something there,” he says.
Studies of transmission patterns in households early in the pandemic showed that infected people were most likely to spread the virus four to six days after exposure. The infectious window hasn’t changed significantly since then, Mina says. A person who tests negative on a rapid test two days after a coronavirus exposure remains at low risk of spreading it.
“Could you infect your spouse or somebody you’re really close with on day two? Probably,” he says. “But are you likely to be a super spreader and be negative on a test? Probably not.”
Testing positive, on the other hand, signals the presence of a lot of virus and the risk of infecting others.
Mina recommends swabbing both the throat and the mouth to improve the sensitivity of a rapid test, since virus levels across both sites can vary from person to person. Also, the coronavirus survives best at 37C (99F), making the throat a more hospitable environment than the nose.
Even when someone has mild symptoms after a coronavirus exposure and continues to return negative rapid tests over several days, it doesn’t necessarily mean they have escaped infection, or that their swabbing technique or tests are faulty, Mina says.
It could instead mean that the person’s “educated” immune system has successfully prevented the virus from reaching levels detectable on a rapid antigen test. The threshold is about 100,000 copies per milliliter — a tiny fraction of the 1 billion to 1 trillion copies per milliliter individuals can have at their infectious peak, he says.
As people’s immunity builds, more people will likely not return a positive rapid test even if they get COVID and feel unwell.
“I want every test to be falsely negative because that describes the triumph of immunity,” Mina says. “It means your immune system is doing what it should be doing.”
Still, he cautions that even when the virus is being suppressed in the respiratory tract, it could be flourishing elsewhere in the body, like the gastrointestinal tract.
“If you really think you’ve been exposed and you feel like you have GI symptoms, treatment might be right for you — it might make sense to get Paxlovid even though you don’t have a positive test,” Mina says. “The test is only as good as the sample, which is only as good as where the virus is in your body.”
 
Are these viruses only exclusive to USA and Canada? Don’t understand why you have started a thread aimed at viruses common to every country in the world - yet you target these 2 nations? Please enlighten me in why you have specifically called out these 2 nations?
 
Are these viruses only exclusive to USA and Canada? Don’t understand why you have started a thread aimed at viruses common to every country in the world - yet you target these 2 nations? Please enlighten me in why you have specifically called out these 2 nations?

It's too much to post for all over the world. The US and Canada report frequently and in better quality so reporting North America numbers gives a good estimate of global numbers.
 
- Place Holder post -

All COVID related discussions to be placed here please!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top