Drone strike on US base kills 3 American soldiers, at least 40 injured - Iraqi Resistance claims responsibility

Status
Not open for further replies.
Iraqi Resistance claims responsibility for successful strike against US soldiers in Syria/Jordan (conflicting reports)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Iraqi Resistance: All US interests in the Middle East are legitimate targets, we don't care about US threats

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Not sure if its this thread or another, il repeat this. One can not blame Iran for this if one is also happily arming and supporting a country who is under occupation (Ukraine). The militias that are attacking US forces can use the exact same logic they are fighting US occupation forces with Iranian arms.

Its rich the US blaming Iran when they are doing the same thing.
 
I see only 2-3 users coming here at a weekly basis to post nonsense or advocating for Iran to be bombed by the US

This specific user with an F-22 profile, when you look at it and see his post history, all glorifying the US and Israel, you immediately think it should be an American ultra patriotic, but no, it has the Pakistani flag on it, i mean come on the US violated Pakistan plenty of times and killed more civilians than any neighboring countries, 9/11 had cost the lives of thousands of Pakistanis
Same for another one with a drone profile

While Iran is the first country to have said Pakistan is a sovereign and real state, just one day after Pakistanis got the UK out, they either hate Iran because it is a Shia majority country or simply because of no reasons but believing CENTCOM nonsense

Then immediately calls anyone contradicting him with "ban this terrorist" in a typical US hypocrisy fashion

I don't can't tell if thats the typical Wahabi pro-Israel muslim behavior or someone that sold his origins for another country
We have also plenty of sellouts people (probably the worst diaspora in the world), they are immediately reality checked here, but their presence on social medias is awful, this is not even a conflict of ideas or a bias, but straight crazy claims, who thought someone could advocate to nuke his own country?

F-22 is a white American chap not Pakistani at all. But like everyone entitled to his view. As for most Pakistanis they have favorable views of Iran.
Regarding that stuff on strikes we watch what people post and if it breaks the rules will act.
 
Slightly edited title to reflect: (1) updated casualty count (reports now say 34 American soldiers injured), (2) removed reference to location of strike (Jordan has denied it took place in Jordan and claims it took place in Syria - conflicting reports here) and (3) added reference to Iraqi Resistance groups claiming responsibility for the strike.
 
Not sure if its this thread or another, il repeat this. One can not blame Iran for this if one is also happily arming and supporting a country who is under occupation (Ukraine). The militias that are attacking US forces can use the exact same logic they are fighting US occupation forces with Iranian arms.

Its rich the US blaming Iran when they are doing the same thing.
Simple logic that many here fail to understand, including some Mods.

I guess nothing works on people determined to see USA as their saviour.
 
The USA has 4 options

1) pressure Israel to end its genocide in Gaza

2) withdraw its forces from the region

3) go to total war with the Axis of Resistance (including Iran)

4) launch strikes against Syrian Resistance fighters and return to status quo and wait for the next Syrian/Iraqi Resistance strike that kills US soldiers

I am not sure what some token strikes inside Iran (something the USA never did before) will achieve other than inviting a direct response from Iran and convincing the Resistance forces to step up attacks against US forces across the region

I think option we will see option 4 in the short term and hopefully option 2 in the medium-long term
 
I would say option 4, if Iran is attacked directly they will have no choice but to retaliate otherwise they will look weak and their red line will be seen as a joke and even Israel can attack without worry.
 
Slightly edited title to reflect: (1) updated casualty count (reports now say 34 American soldiers injured), (2) removed reference to location of strike (Jordan has denied it took place in Jordan and claims it took place in Syria - conflicting reports here) and (3) added reference to Iraqi Resistance groups claiming responsibility for the strike.
Correct updates in following link:

 
Correct updates in following link:

Thanks, that source says "more than two dozen injured" which is what the original reports said.

I took my update from Sky News: https://news.sky.com/story/three-us-troops-killed-and-25-injured-in-drone-attack-in-jordan-13058827
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


usual American neo-con suspects calling for war with Iran

I am not sure how Iraqi fighters striking a US military base in Jordan/Syria is grounds for the US to "Target Tehran" (not a military site, just Tehran?) but I don't make the decisions
 
Probably not, airstrikes in Syria and Iraq most likely, which is a norm now anyway.

USA won't dare attack Iran.


That's the real question if this mess escalates into direct American military involvement against Iran and it's affiliations.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top