Hamartia Antidote
Elite Member
- Thread starter
- #31
From a head start??? What head start? Wow you have completely misunderstood everything.
Elon Musk is on track to become the world's first dollar trillionaire
- Thread starter Hamartia Antidote
- Start date
From a head start??? What head start? Wow you have completely misunderstood everything.
Liquidator
Trusted Member
Also
The Jetsons example was given
Elysium is a more likely scenario
A select few live in luxury....that is the trajectory that cannot be denied.
The Jetsons example was given
Elysium is a more likely scenario
A select few live in luxury....that is the trajectory that cannot be denied.
Hamartia Antidote
Elite Member
- Thread starter
- #33
Hamartia Antidote
Elite Member
- Thread starter
- #34
that's certainly possible..as this is what happened when they once threw something out a window
Last edited:
Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ
Trusted Member
So now someone else does your thinking?
The technology was around for decades! GM also made an attempt... Nissan had leaf but Tesla pioneered the luxury EV market where it is finding competition. Lucid and Rivian are direct competitors in the US and globally multiple manufacturers have caught up... driving not only the prices down but bringing new and better technology.
Your examples, BYD started making those in 2020 and Geely in 2021!
Back to deepseek!
Hamartia Antidote
Elite Member
- Thread starter
- #36
so now you admit this "head start" you previously claimed didn't exist..nice!!!!
no, you are wrong...as usual. You have repeatedly made silly mistakes.
So you find the following to be wrong eh?
here is the BYD E6 announcement at the Detroit Auto Show
BYD e6 Electric Car, Detroit Auto Show. 01.12.10
Do you want to try being wrong for a 3rd time??
Last edited:
Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ
Trusted Member
Deepseek is affecting your basic comprehension
BYD launched its first luxury EV HAN in July 2020.
Geely launched zeeker in 2021.
Have another go deepseek!
Hamartia Antidote
Elite Member
- Thread starter
- #38
LOL! stop trying to weasel out of your errors by deflecting from the BYD E6 to the BYD Han...typical goalpost moving when you realized your mistake.
Just admit you f*cked up and stop digging yourself into a bigger hole
Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ
Trusted Member
You literally brought up E6.
That is one hell of a cope! Elon will appreciate!
Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ
Trusted Member
Hamartia Antidote
Elite Member
- Thread starter
- #41
Well incompetent Chinese AI is certainly doing better than you...I guess that isn't saying much about you or their tech.
Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ
Trusted Member
Another gem!
Learning from your inputs I guess... the AI adapted!
BYD E6 was similar to Nissan Leaf!
Back to AI DOTE!
Liquidator
Trusted Member
You are wasting your time
He's started his own YouTube channel as well. That's even more cringe
Hamartia Antidote
Elite Member
- Thread starter
- #44
World's richest billionaires' net worth as Elon Musk makes history
Elon Musk has become the first individual to surpass a net worth of $600 billion, according to Forbes. The achievement not only solidifies his position as the world’s richest person but also dramatically widens the wealth gap at the top, outpacing other tech giants and industry leaders.
On Monday, Forbes reported that Elon Musk’s net worth reached $600 billion, a result of SpaceX’s recent tender offer valuing the private company at $800 billion. This valuation nearly doubled from August, adding an estimated $168 billion to Musk’s fortune in a single day. Musk, who serves as CEO of both SpaceX and Tesla, holds a 42 percent stake in SpaceX and around 12 percent in Tesla. The value of these holdings is estimated at $336 billion and $197 billion, respectively, according to Forbes.
Here’s an up-to-date overview of the world’s richest individuals, based on Forbes’ real-time billionaire rankings and recent analyses:
- Google co-founder Larry Page — $252.6 billion
- Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison — $234.9 billion
- Amazon founder Jeff Bezos — $235.7 billion
- Google co-founder Sergey Brin — $233.1 billion
- Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg — $225.3 billion
- LVMH CEO Bernard Arnault and family — $190.1 billion
- NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang — $154.4 billion
- Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Warren Buffett — $147.8 billion
- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer — $145.4 billion
Musk’s wealth has grown at a historic pace, setting milestone after milestone. He crossed $100 billion in August 2020, $200 billion in September 2021, $300 billion in November 2021, and $400 billion in December 2024. In October 2025, he reached $500 billion and now tops $600 billion.
Musk is closer to becoming a trillionaire—only $323 billion away—than being caught by the second-richest, Page. If SpaceX goes public with a projected valuation of $1.5 trillion in 2026, this figure could climb even more rapidly.
SpaceX’s potential IPO and further gains from Tesla could push him toward trillionaire status as soon as 2026. If SpaceX’s expected public offering targets a $1.5 trillion valuation, Musk’s 42% stake could increase his net worth by another substantial margin. Additionally, Tesla’s approved pay package could give Musk up to $1 trillion in stock if ambitious operational milestones dubbed “Mars shot” are achieved.
With only $23 billion more needed to hit $700 billion, he could be the first person to hit that milestone as well.
"Musk Turned $180M Into $600B" - Elon’s Empire SKYROCKETS Before SpaceX Goes Public
Hamartia Antidote
Elite Member
- Thread starter
- #45
Wow Deleware court ruling overturned
www.cnbc.com
Elon Musk's 2018 CEO pay package from Tesla, worth some $56 billion when it vested, must be restored, the Delaware Supreme Court ruled Friday.
"We reverse the Court of Chancery's rescission remedy and award $1 in nominal damages," the judges wrote in their opinion
In the decision out Friday, the Delaware Supreme Court judges said a lower court's decision to cancel Musk's 2018 pay plan was too extreme a remedy, and the lower court did not give Tesla a chance to say what a fair compensation ought to be.
The decision on the appeal in this case, known as Tornetta v. Musk, likely ends the years-long fight over Musk's record-setting compensation.
Dorothy Lund, a professor at Columbia Law School, told CNBC that while the Friday opinion may restore the 2018 pay plan for Musk, it leaves the rest of the lower court's decision unaddressed and in-tact.
"The court had previously decided that Musk was a controlling shareholder of Tesla, and that the Tesla board and he arranged an unfair pay plan for him," she said. "None of that was reversed in this decision."
The Delaware Supreme Court issued the order "per curiam" with no single judge taking credit for writing the opinion, and no dissent noted.
Musk's $56 billion Tesla pay package must be restored as court rules cancellation was too extreme
Shareholder Richard J. Tornetta brought the suit, accusing Musk and the Tesla board of a breach of fiduciary duties.
www.cnbc.com
Musk's $56 billion Tesla pay package must be restored as court rules cancellation was too extreme
Elon Musk's 2018 CEO pay package from Tesla, worth some $56 billion when it vested, must be restored, the Delaware Supreme Court ruled Friday.
"We reverse the Court of Chancery's rescission remedy and award $1 in nominal damages," the judges wrote in their opinion
In the decision out Friday, the Delaware Supreme Court judges said a lower court's decision to cancel Musk's 2018 pay plan was too extreme a remedy, and the lower court did not give Tesla a chance to say what a fair compensation ought to be.
The decision on the appeal in this case, known as Tornetta v. Musk, likely ends the years-long fight over Musk's record-setting compensation.
Dorothy Lund, a professor at Columbia Law School, told CNBC that while the Friday opinion may restore the 2018 pay plan for Musk, it leaves the rest of the lower court's decision unaddressed and in-tact.
"The court had previously decided that Musk was a controlling shareholder of Tesla, and that the Tesla board and he arranged an unfair pay plan for him," she said. "None of that was reversed in this decision."
The Delaware Supreme Court issued the order "per curiam" with no single judge taking credit for writing the opinion, and no dissent noted.
