Elon Musk’s Starlink Launches 1st-Ever Cell Service Satellites

Guys, whatever spare cash you have, buy SpaceX, 5 years from now your returns will be insane

Well I guess we know what he'll be doing when his share tranche becomes available next year...

Elon Musk says he’ll give a SpaceX share to every child in America next year​







shield2.png




:unsure:I know how Elon Musk thinks and if I were him I'd also make sure this is a way to give away his wealth by really sticking it to the Lefties like Bernie Sanders somehow for nagging him to give away his wealth....I just have to think of what his rationale is to make them absolutely positively cringe every day for the rest of their lives regreting asking him to do it....these SpaceX shares aren't voting shares.....what could it be..:unsure::unsure::unsure: ....oh wait a minute...I think I know...wow...it could be very very devious...let me ask AI about it:




shield.png


:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

extortion.png
 
Last edited:
European carriers fearful they may end up like legacy auto when they didn't take EVs seriously.

TLDR: They will pool money to buy the spectrums SpaceX needs in Europe to enable direct-to-cell service and/or try to get those spectrums restricted to ownership by EU companies only.


Europe's Big Four Telecoms Unite Against Starlink

Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Telefónica, Vodafone plan joint satellite spectrum bid


Four of Europe's largest mobile carriers just drew a line in the sand against SpaceX's satellite dominance. Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Telefónica, and Vodafone signed a letter of intent to pursue a joint spectrum bid that would power a homegrown direct-to-device satellite network, marking the continent's most coordinated response yet to Starlink's rapid expansion. The alliance would see the telecoms handle ground infrastructure while an unnamed satellite partner provides the orbital constellation, setting up a showdown over who controls Europe's next-generation connectivity.

Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Telefónica, and Vodafone are betting that strength in numbers can counter SpaceX's first-mover advantage in satellite-to-phone connectivity. The four carriers announced they're exploring a joint bid for spectrum that would enable direct-to-device satellite services across Europe, according to a letter of intent published by Deutsche Telekom.

The timing isn't coincidental. SpaceX has been aggressively expanding its wireless ambitions, deploying thousands of satellites and acquiring spectrum in a play that sent traditional telecom stocks tumbling. The European alliance represents a defensive maneuver by incumbents who watched Starlink's U.S. network plans trigger a telecom stock rout just weeks ago, with Verizon suffering its worst trading day since 2002.

The European carriers say their joint initiative aims to "meet customer demand for universal coverage in underserved areas, strengthen the resilience of public networks, protect critical communications, and support development" of next-generation connectivity. But the subtext is clear - this is about preventing SpaceX from owning the satellite-to-phone market the way it dominates orbital launch services.

The partnership divides responsibilities in a way that plays to each side's strengths. The four telecoms would manage terrestrial infrastructure, leveraging their existing cell tower networks, spectrum licenses, and customer relationships. An unnamed satellite partner - whose identity the carriers haven't disclosed - would handle the orbital side, deploying and operating the constellation that beams signals directly to standard smartphones.

That mystery partner is the critical variable. Amazon has been ramping up its Project Kuiper constellation, recently hitting 1,000 satellites in its production pipeline. European satellite operators like Eutelsat and SES have direct-to-device ambitions but lack SpaceX's manufacturing scale. The partnership structure suggests the carriers want flexibility to negotiate with multiple potential satellite providers rather than locking in too early.

The spectrum bid itself will be the first major battleground. European regulators have been weighing how to allocate frequencies for satellite services, with the FCC's recent moves toward a 25MHz auction setting a precedent that Brussels is watching closely. A unified bid from four major carriers carries political weight that could influence how European spectrum authorities structure their auctions.

But the European alliance faces formidable challenges. SpaceX has already launched over 6,000 Starlink satellites and demonstrated working direct-to-phone connectivity with T-Mobile in the U.S. The company's vertical integration - building rockets, satellites, and ground equipment in-house - gives it cost advantages that traditional aerospace contractors can't match. SpaceX recently secured $40 billion in financing for a massive Nvidia GPU purchase, underscoring its access to capital and willingness to invest at scale.


The carriers also have to navigate complex regulatory environments across multiple European countries, each with different spectrum rules and national security concerns about satellite infrastructure. Getting four major telecoms to coordinate on technology standards, investment timelines, and revenue sharing will test whether this alliance can move fast enough to matter.

What's driving the urgency is the recognition that satellite connectivity isn't a niche feature anymore. Direct-to-device service promises to eliminate dead zones in rural areas, provide backup during natural disasters, and enable IoT applications that current cellular networks can't reach. Whoever controls that infrastructure gains leverage over the entire mobile ecosystem. The European carriers watched SpaceX's spectrum deals reshape competitive dynamics in the U.S. and decided that surrendering the European market without a fight wasn't an option.

The letter of intent is just the opening move. The carriers still need to finalize their satellite partnership, submit formal spectrum bids, secure regulatory approvals, and actually deploy a working network. SpaceX, meanwhile, keeps launching satellites at a pace of roughly 100 per month. The question isn't whether Europe can build a satellite network - the technology exists - but whether a consortium of legacy telecoms can execute fast enough to compete with a company that's rewriting the rules of the space industry.

Future tech predictions

Europe's telecom giants are making their stand against SpaceX's satellite ambitions, but they're fighting an uphill battle against a competitor that's already in orbit and launching faster than traditional aerospace ever imagined. The joint spectrum bid signals that European carriers recognize the existential threat of losing connectivity infrastructure to a Silicon Valley outsider. Whether this alliance can translate coordination into execution speed will determine if Europe builds its own satellite future or becomes a customer of Elon Musk's constellation. The spectrum auctions ahead won't just allocate radio frequencies - they'll decide who controls the next layer of global communications infrastructure.






US Ambassador to the EU warns of possible response to spectrum restrictions — Anadolu Agency​


US Ambassador to the European Union Andrew Puzder warned that European companies could face potential US retaliatory measures in the American market. This could happen if the EU advances a proposal to reserve a significant portion of radio spectrum for direct satellite-to-smartphone communications for European operators, Anadolu Agency reports.
Europeans will cut their noses off to spite their faces.
 
When will this option come to Pakistan, or it won't, due to military control over the masses ??
 

SpaceX Just Made Cell Towers Cool Again. Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile Are Paying the Price​


Key Points​

  • A report that SpaceX wants access to 80,000 U.S. cell sites sent tower stocks soaring and telecom stocks down on Friday.
  • The last company that tried to become America's fourth wireless carrier ended up fighting its tower landlords in court.

There were some big moves in telecommunications stocks on Friday. On one hand, shares of cell tower owners Crown Castle (CCI+9.06%) and American Tower (AMT+4.08%) soared, with shares up by about 9% and 4%, respectively, as of midday. On the other hand, the three largest wireless carriers plunged, with Verizon (VZ-1.20%), AT&T (T-7.96%), and T-Mobile (TMUS-7.71%) all deep in the red.

Both moves are due to one company, SpaceX (SPCX+1.89%). On Thursday evening, Bloomberg reported that SpaceX is in talks to secure at least 80,000 cell sites across the United States as it aims to become the fourth nationwide wireless carrier. For context, 80,000 sites would represent about half of all the purpose-built cell towers in the U.S., so it would be a pretty big move.

Cellular communications tower with multiple antennas against a colorful sunset sky

Image source: Getty Images.
This is the second time in October that SpaceX has sent shockwaves through the telecom industry. First, on Oct. 9, SpaceX agreed to buy $8 billion in low-frequency wireless spectrum, and telecom stocks plunged. So, will SpaceX truly boost the tower companies and cost the telecom leaders money?

Why are the tower companies soaring?​

First, a little context on how the cell tower business works. The owner builds a tower and then rents space on it to wireless carriers, typically under long-term leases. Next time you drive by a cell tower, take a look at the top. You'll probably see several rings of transmission equipment, and each of those represents a tenant. Since the tower is already standing, adding tenants produces extra revenue with very little additional cost.

Ever since Sprint was acquired by T-Mobile, the tower industry has essentially had three wireless customers. The majority of Crown Castle's rent comes from AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile. A well-capitalized fourth player would mean more tenants per tower.

This is also a notable expansion of SpaceX's plans. Although the company has made its telecom network ambitions known for some time, as recently as August, management described its network as small cells mounted on rooftops (not traditional towers). But without getting too technical, the low-band spectrum it bought makes large towers far more useful, so it makes sense to add them to the plan.

Of course, this isn't the first time a "fourth carrier" has emerged. Just a few years ago, Dish Network signed long-term tower leases to build its own 5G network. To make a long story short, Dish's parent company sold most of its spectrum in 2025 and began shutting down the network. Of course, SpaceX is a far more deep-pocketed tenant and could easily afford to build a nationwide network.

Should investors forget about the carriers?​

SpaceX is certainly a threat to the big three wireless carriers, but the recent sell-off appears a bit overdone. After all, SpaceX would be starting with no wireless customers at all, it holds less spectrum than any of the others, and its service isn't expected to launch commercially until late 2027. And building a competitive network would be a multiyear process at a minimum.

Let's be clear. SpaceX could certainly pressure the three major wireless carriers over time, but this isn't exactly a death sentence for them either. All have existed in the past with a fourth competitor (Sprint), and pricing power hasn't changed that much since the number dropped to three.

The bottom line​

If you're thinking about buying tower owners as a momentum play or telecoms at a discount, it might be a smart idea to be patient. For one thing, although Crown Castle was specifically mentioned as a company SpaceX was in talks with, there isn't a signed contract or any official management acknowledgment yet. And the telecom sell-off may be overdone, as all that is happening right now is that a potential competitor (who would be starting from scratch) is negotiating with landlords.

In a nutshell, the market is pricing in a deal that hasn't happened yet, and the reaction on both the tower owner and wireless carrier side may be a bit overdone. I'm keeping an eye on some of the stocks involved, but I'm waiting for further official developments before making any moves.

​

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top