European deportation news

[Pakistani Dragon]

Is this thread dedicated to white supremacists?

Are the jails not already full of more non-white people than white people that the white supremacists continue to create an impression that no action is being taken against non-white people?

 

[Davey Crockett]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Foinikas]

The small hats hate native Europeans, Anglo-Saxons, the white races, however you want to call us. You cannot ever underestimate how much they hate us and want to wipe us out. They have a plan and they are sticking to it. They have us fighting amongst ourselves and clutching at pearls over mean words such as racism, or transphobic, homophobic or any other absurd phobia or ism.

Any advocacy for white nationalist interests has been twisted and construed as..... gasp..... WHITE SUPREMACY! First order of business is to break the grip that this ridiculous propaganda has upon our people. None of these words or pejoratives mean anything. We need to stand up and claim what is ours and be prepared to fight to take it back. Until that mindset has solidified in the men of Western Europe, then nothing will happen to reverse this. However, it is eminently reversible, all we need do is change our minds and that change is happening.

Here's my theory:

1. You have a largely homogenous country,vast majority of the population is one ethnicity,same religion.
2. You bring in masses of immigrants legal and illegal,throughout the years. You slowly change the demographics and the ethnic composition of the country.
3. After 30-40 years and depending on the number of foreigners you've imported,there is no longer a nation-State,but a country full of people from different ethnicities,religions and cultures. You forcefully create a multicultural country.
4. When the people are not of one ethnicity,when they are not of one nation,they don't have the same religion,they don't share the same worldview,the same culture and ideals,there is no unity. When the is no unity,the people are divided about sociopolitical and religious issues. When the people are divided one supports this,the other that,the other something else. So it's easier for the politicians to control them.
5. Politicians come in,they take decisions that are against the good of the nation,of the country or the spiritual good of the people,there's little unity,so the decisions pass.
6. Politicians decide "we're now a multicultural society,so we don't want to offend or provoke anyone" so they turn religion into a "personal choice" and they heavily secularize the country to the point of atheism.
7. Politicians and various groups come and say "we're now a multicultural society and everyone is free to believe what he wants,so we need more rights for other people",and they introduce LGBTQ and all kinds of laws.
8. A nation-State that used to be homogenous and shared the same faith,values and culture has now been turned into a forced multicultural chaos were for the sake of multiculturalism,the fundamental principles of the nation have been replaced with extreme liberalism and immorality.

Who benefits from this? The centers that don't want opposition from countries with a solid foundation of moral principles.

 

[nahtanbob]

Here's my theory:

1. You have a largely homogenous country,vast majority of the population is one ethnicity,same religion.
2. You bring in masses of immigrants legal and illegal,throughout the years. You slowly change the demographics and the ethnic composition of the country.
3. After 30-40 years and depending on the number of foreigners you've imported,there is no longer a nation-State,but a country full of people from different ethnicities,religions and cultures. You forcefully create a multicultural country.
4. When the people are not of one ethnicity,when they are not of one nation,they don't have the same religion,they don't share the same worldview,the same culture and ideals,there is no unity. When the is no unity,the people are divided about sociopolitical and religious issues. When the people are divided one supports this,the other that,the other something else. So it's easier for the politicians to control them.
5. Politicians come in,they take decisions that are against the good of the nation,of the country or the spiritual good of the people,there's little unity,so the decisions pass.
6. Politicians decide "we're now a multicultural society,so we don't want to offend or provoke anyone" so they turn religion into a "personal choice" and they heavily secularize the country to the point of atheism.
7. Politicians and various groups come and say "we're now a multicultural society and everyone is free to believe what he wants,so we need more rights for other people",and they introduce LGBTQ and all kinds of laws.
8. A nation-State that used to be homogenous and shared the same faith,values and culture has now been turned into a forced multicultural chaos were for the sake of multiculturalism,the fundamental principles of the nation have been replaced with extreme liberalism and immorality.

Who benefits from this? The centers that don't want opposition from countries with a solid foundation of moral principles.

On one hand, people will demand separate states for Pakistanis, Palestinians. On the other hand, it is not right for other non-Muslim nationalities to reject migrants

Of course they will ignore co-religionists like Indonesia, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia who deport them

 

[Davey Crockett]

Ceuta. In just 2 weeks, African immigrants turned the Spanish city into African slums. Huts made of sticks and cardboard. Garbage and human excrement everywhere. An indescribable stench.

The health services have declared a health crisis: scabies, tuberculosis, cholera, measles, infectious diarrhea, impetigo.

Over 10 women already raped, including a 10-year-old girl.

Spaniards are not leaving their homes.

Spain's Prime Minister Sánchez is diving with his wife on the island of Lanzarote. On vacation.

#MasowaMigracja #migration

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

ah yes...Liberals at work again!

Just like Boston: "As a Sanctuary City we welcome all migrants with open arms..please come here..we will hug you and welcome you! Ooops..wait..it will cost us lost revenue in our pricey hotels if we house them...wait...wait...wait..let me think...I know...we will send all the migrants to the suburbs [even though they aren't Sanctuary Cities]...yes..yes..yes..that seems very fair [pats self on back]..phew that was close!!!

The tiny village of 350 people that’s voted to leave the UK

Andy Burnham has said that wealthy areas of Britain must ‘play their part’ in housing asylum seekers

www.independent.co.uk

The tiny village of Piddington that’s voted to leave the UK​

Andy Burnham has said that wealthy areas of Britain must ‘play their part’ in housing asylum seekers

A quaint village in Oxfordshire has staged a referendum where they have voted to leave the United Kingdom - over concerns about a nearby military site being used to house asylum seekers.

The Home Office is considering using the Bicester barracks to house 1,250 people, but this has been met with fierce opposition from the 350 local residents of Piddington.

In response, Andy Burnham said on Tuesday that wealthy areas of Britain “must play their part”, and that the country “cannot have a situation where it’s only the poorest communities in the country” housing asylum seekers.

He added that he would take a look at the situation, and said he was “prepared always to listen to people, to work with people and to pick up legitimate concerns”.

Speaking to the Today programme on BBC Radio 4, Tim McNally, the chair of Piddington council said he was “pleased” that Mr Burnham had addressed the situation and was prepared to help him “find a way forward”.

Asked about the government’s response that middle-class communities needed to play their part, he said: “I fully support that and understand that. What Piddington is asking for is not to be exempt from the national responsibility.

“We know this country has a massive problem. The real issue here is about the scale, location and process.

“It’s not about the humanity of those being accommodated. Just because we are, as you may say, an affluent area it doesn’t mean high capacity.”

He added that the village had been given no information about how the Home Office intends to manage the 1,250 asylum seekers in an open environment.

Home Office minister Anna Turley said they would be “contained” on the “self-contained” site in Piddington but clarified those being housed would be allowed out.

Ms Turley told LBC radio: “They’re not going to be in the village, they’re going to be contained in a former military base, they will be allowed out, everything they need will be on that site.”

She added: “We are looking at former military bases around the country, we’re also looking at former industrial sites, student accommodation, other means by which we can put people in secure places that is contained and is manageable – going back to the beginning of our conversation – is more affordable than putting people in hotels.”

She said the government will “redouble” its efforts to clamp down on illegal boats crossing the English Channel carrying migrants.

Asylum seekers have been housed at various sites throughout the country, including at former military sites in rural areas such as at Wethersfield in Essex and Crowborough in East Sussex.

The government has plans for more housing at former military sites, subject to planning permission and approvals.

The Home Office is assessing whether Barnham Camp in Suffolk could be used to accommodate men aged between 18 and 65.

Protesters last weekend gathered outside the former RAF base and unrest has broken out in nearby Thetford, Norfolk, where people are thought to have tried to storm homes linked to asylum seekers.

Elsewhere in the country, hotels have been used to house asylum seekers, but the Government has committed to ending their use.

Hotels which asylum seekers have vacated include the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, the Delta Hotel Cheshunt in Hertfordshire, Best Western Stoke in Staffordshire, and the Wool Merchant Hotel in Halifax, West Yorkshire.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

This Picturesque English Village Could Ask To JOIN THE USA