Ex-Japan minister faults India for Modi bullet train delay

Please stop molesting AI


Obviously, the link you provided and the AI's response are the same in attributing investment outflows as the cause of the net decline. The only difference is that the AI performed calculations and pointed out that among the outflows, outbound foreign direct investment by foreigners is the dominant component, whereas the link you posted did not distinguish between the proportion of India's outward investment and the proportion of foreign direct investment outflows within the total outflows.



Net FDI is calculated after adjusting gross FDI for investments that are repatriated by foreign companies and overseas investments made by Indian companies. Despite record gross FDI inflows, the net figure has been low in the past two years due to foreign investors taking back money they had previously invested in India. This repatriation can be in the form of profits, dividend, or sale of assets. Meanwhile, Indian companies have also invested more abroad.


1. The mathematical relationship behind India's declining net FDI

Assume India has:

  • Gross FDI inflows (foreign capital inflows): US$95 billion
  • Net FDI inflows: US$7.7 billion
Then:

FDI outflows ≈ 95 − 7.7 = US$87.3 billion

That is, there are outflows of approximately US$87 billion.

2. But Indian companies' overseas investment is only about US$20 billion

Overseas direct investment data from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) typically shows:

Indian companies' outward FDI is approximately:

  • Generally in the range of US$10–20 billion;
  • Even in higher years, it is far below US$80 billion.
Therefore:

If total outflows are close to US$87 billion, while Indian companies' overseas investment is only about US$20 billion, then the vast majority of the remaining outflows cannot come from Indian companies' overseas investment.

It is more likely to come from:

① Divestment by foreign investors

For example:

  • Foreign funds selling shares of Indian companies;
  • Foreign enterprises exiting some investments;
  • Equity transfers.
② Repatriation of profits by foreign enterprises

For example:

  • Multinational corporations repatriating profits earned in India back to their parent companies.
③ Other capital adjustments in FDI statistics

Including:

  • Intra-company fund flows;
  • Changes in debt instruments;
  • Equity transactions.
 
Obviously, the link you provided and the AI's response are the same in attributing investment outflows as the cause of the net decline. The only difference is that the AI performed calculations and pointed out that among the outflows, outbound foreign direct investment by foreigners is the dominant component, whereas the link you posted did not distinguish between the proportion of India's outward investment and the proportion of foreign direct investment outflows within the total outflows.



Net FDI is calculated after adjusting gross FDI for investments that are repatriated by foreign companies and overseas investments made by Indian companies. Despite record gross FDI inflows, the net figure has been low in the past two years due to foreign investors taking back money they had previously invested in India. This repatriation can be in the form of profits, dividend, or sale of assets. Meanwhile, Indian companies have also invested more abroad.


1. The mathematical relationship behind India's declining net FDI

Assume India has:

  • Gross FDI inflows (foreign capital inflows): US$95 billion
  • Net FDI inflows: US$7.7 billion
Then:

FDI outflows ≈ 95 − 7.7 = US$87.3 billion

That is, there are outflows of approximately US$87 billion.

2. But Indian companies' overseas investment is only about US$20 billion

Overseas direct investment data from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) typically shows:

Indian companies' outward FDI is approximately:

  • Generally in the range of US$10–20 billion;
  • Even in higher years, it is far below US$80 billion.
Therefore:

If total outflows are close to US$87 billion, while Indian companies' overseas investment is only about US$20 billion, then the vast majority of the remaining outflows cannot come from Indian companies' overseas investment.

It is more likely to come from:

① Divestment by foreign investors

For example:

  • Foreign funds selling shares of Indian companies;
  • Foreign enterprises exiting some investments;
  • Equity transfers.
② Repatriation of profits by foreign enterprises

For example:

  • Multinational corporations repatriating profits earned in India back to their parent companies.
③ Other capital adjustments in FDI statistics

Including:

  • Intra-company fund flows;
  • Changes in debt instruments;
  • Equity transactions.
Respectfully, you are now confusing our usual Indian cut-and-paste experts with sound economic principles. They will soon have to report you to the CEO.
 
Respectfully, you are now confusing our usual Indian cut-and-paste experts with sound economic principles. They will soon have to report you to the CEO.
You should also learn from him, from using AI to form basic English sentences to needlessly molesting AI will be quite an upgrade for you!
 
Respectfully, you are now confusing our usual Indian cut-and-paste experts with sound economic principles. They will soon have to report you to the CEO.

Ah..it's something everyone understands around India. All to see.
 
You should also learn from him, from using AI to form basic English sentences to needlessly molesting AI will be quite an upgrade for you!
It is a strange obsession that a few of our esteemed Indian guests seem to experience, that they happen see "molestation" (of all things!) occurring when, objectively, there is none.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

🇮🇳 🇱🇰

.
=>
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

👍
 

The Shinkansen debate: Why India & Japan disagree over the bullet train project​

Jul 23, 2026

Japan helped finance India's first bullet train project and offered its iconic Shinkansen technology. But now, the partnership has hit a rough patch. India plans to use its own high-speed trains and European signalling technology instead of key Japanese systems, prompting criticism from Tokyo. In this video, we explain what's behind the disagreement, why both sides see the project differently, and what it means for the future of India's bullet train ambitions.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Lol, the HSR trains India are building that are intended to be used om M-A line are also based on Shinkansen train tech transferred from Japan. So, don't know what the fuss with Japanese.
 
I don't know what is the bitter row between these two since they are so close good buddy buddy and brothers. In her recent visit to India, Modi calls Japanese PM Sanae Takaichi "my sister" and Takaichi calls Modi "my older brother", haha.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top