How did VAR work?
During the group stage, the video assistant referee (VAR) seemed to be running smoothly.
Then the knockout stages brought a lot of inconsistencies.
There has rarely been too much controversy with VAR at the World Cup in the past.
The Egyptian Football Association (EFA)
called for an investigation following their 3-2 loss to Argentina, in which they had a goal ruled out on a VAR review.
Many other coaches complained about the standard of the refereeing, too.
The more games you have, the more video match officials you use, so the harder it is to get consistency.
There have been 37 VAR interventions so far at this World Cup, a frequency of 0.36 per game. That is about on par with the 0.37 in Qatar.
It is higher than the Premier League's 0.29.
On subjective interventions, when the referee goes to the monitor, this World Cup had a frequency of 0.27 per match - the Premier League is almost half this at 0.15.
So why does it feel better in the World Cup? Speed.
It is the biggest issue the game faces with video review in domestic football, but bar a couple of situations, the decisions were made very swiftly.