Gaza-Israel Conflict | 2023-2024

UK/US: We are going to withhold funding from the aid organisation that saves lives while still supporting Israel’s genocide

I CANNOT EXPRESS HOW EVIL THESE FUCKERS ARE IN WORDS"
I have been wondering about the defunding of UNWRA after about 3.5 months of the beginning of this conflict. The timing tells me that Israelis and their backers are running out of options and thus using whatever they can to weaken the resistance against the occupation.

So something could be brewing north of the aparthied state? that is a worry but at the same time if there is truth in this, it means Netanyahoo and his loonies have gone complete looney. If they open a second front with Hezbollah the region will go up.
Attacking Lebanon will be a roll of the dice for Israel, with the hope that the United States gets involved. It will be very dangerous for the region, including for Israel, but Israel simply cannot afford to appear to have 'lost' because, like a typical bully in, say in a primary school, the bully has to appear to be always strong. Hell, I knew that growing up in Pakistan in my 4th grade of school where a big bully would beat me up until my elder brother, who was in the same school, was physically up to the bully, beat the crap out of the bully one day. Peace after that!!

Like I said, symbolic. What is the ICJ verdict going to do about it?
Ben Norton, who is one of the only 5-7 Western vloggers I truly admire, is saying the ICJ ruling has been spun around to benefit Israel--he's saying the reality is different.


having said that Hezbollah can get resupplied by Iran-Iraq-Syria and 1,000s of fighters can pour through the border into Lebanon
Hezbollah said a few years ago they could take all the Northern Galilee if needed including the Sheeba farms

There shouldn't be any issue Hezbollah getting replenished. Iran, to its great cost, has been working hard on that, and yes, thousands of fighters perhaps all the way from even Pakistan and Afghanistan would move close to Israel in case of a regional war. The chessboard is stacked against Israel.
 
Last edited:
This sky news lady will need support.
I have noticed the Isareli tactic during interviews , they interrupt and bark like rabid dogs at the speaker whenever something is said against Israel .
 
it's getting real dirty now and enemies of the region are using every dirty tool at their disposal to cause mayhem:-


Iran, Pakistan won't let enemies damage brotherly ties: Tehran​

Saturday, 27 January 2024 9:13 PM [ Last Update: Saturday, 27 January 2024 9:13 PM ]


Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Nasser Kan'ani
Following a deadly attack targeting Pakistani nationals inside Iran, the Islamic Republic says Tehran and Islamabad will not tolerate affliction of damage to the countries' relations.
"Iran and Pakistan will not allow enemies to cause damage to the countries' brotherly relations," Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Nasser Kan'ani said on Saturday.
His remarks came hours after unknown assailants gunned down at least nine Pakistani nationals and injured three others in the suburb of the city of Saravan in the southeastern Iranian province of Sistan and Baluchestan.
The atrocity was perpetrated by three gunmen, who attacked the residence housing the victims, and fled the scene after causing the casualties, said the province's Deputy Governor for Security and Law Enforcement, Alireza Marhamati.
The police reached the scene of the attack in its immediate aftermath, Marhamati noted, asserting, "Sistan and Baluchestan's judicial, security, and intelligence apparatuses will, without doubt, confront the elements causing insecurity in the province decisively."
Adding to his remarks, Kan'ani vehemently condemned the attack and condoled with the Pakistani government and the survivors.
Iran's relevant authorities are continuing their investigation into the tragedy, he noted.
Pakistan: Attack work of 'common enemies'
Also on Saturday, Pakistan's Foreign Minister Jalil Abbas Jilani lamented the attack, considering it to be an effort on the part of the countries' "common enemies" to disrupt their mutual ties.
The top diplomat extended his condolences to the families of the victims, urging the Iranian government to take due action against the elements behind the attack.
The two neighboring countries witnessed an escalation of cross-border tensions over Iran's counter-terrorism operations.
On January 16, Iran launched simultaneous drone and missile attacks on two bases of Jaish ul-Adl, a terror outfit that was formed in 2012 and has conducted several attacks on Iranian soil in recent years.
The group claimed responsibility for an attack in December 2023 on a police station in the southeastern city of Rask that killed at least 11 Iranian police officers.
On January 10, another attack by the group on a police station in the city killed one officer.
Pakistan carried out strikes on January 17 against, what it called were, bases of the separatist Baloch Liberation Front and Baloch Liberation Army in regions close to Iran’s border.
Tehran condemned the attack as unacceptable and unbalanced.

Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:
www.presstv.co.uk
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
E-mail
Tweet
Like
Share

Iran Pakistan relations attack deadly
MORE FROM IRAN
A Safe Place

A Safe Place​


Long Live Persian Gulf: The Girl of the Sea

Long Live Persian Gulf: The Girl of the Sea​



Sign up for our Newsletter
Sign up for our newsletter to receive a daily email of our best content
GET STARTED


LATEST NEWS

Iran, Pakistan won't let enemies damage brotherly ties: Tehran3hr​


VIDEO | Israel intensifies its genocidal campaign despite ICJ ruling3hr​


US approves sale of F-16 fighter jets to Turkey6hr​


Qatar, US committed to deal on Iran's access to unfrozen assets: Qatari FM6hr​


UNSC to meet to discuss ICJ ruling on Israeli genocide in Gaza6hr​


VIDEO | British charities supporting genocide6hr​


VIDEO | Day of judgement7hr​


VIDEO | Israel's pending reckoning7hr​


MORE
RELATED ARTICLES
Raeisi: Iran-Pakistan border must be safeguarded against insecurity

Raeisi: Iran-Pakistan border must be safeguarded against insecurity​

 

Uganda distances itself from Ugandan judge's ICJ vote on Gaza​

Saturday, 27 January 2024 10:59 AM [ Last Update: Saturday, 27 January 2024 10:59 AM ]


Justice Julia Sebutinde is a Ugandan judge serving her second term at the ICJ. (Photo by Academy for Cultural Diplomacy)
The Ugandan government has disassociated itself from the ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ)'s Ugandan judge Julia Sebutinde regarding Israel's genocide case brought by South Africa.
The ambassador and permanent representative of Uganda to the United Nations, Adonia Ayebare, criticized Sebutinde saying she does not represent Uganda as he reiterated Ugandan support for Palestine.
“Justice Sebutinde ruling at the International Court of Justice does not represent the Government of Uganda’s position on the situation in Palestine,” Ayebare said on X, formerly Twitter.
“She has previously voted against Uganda’s case on DRC. Uganda’s support for the plight of the Palestinian people has been expressed through Uganda ‘s voting pattern at the United Nations,” he added.

The ICJ on Friday directed Israel to take all necessary measures to avoid casualties, devastation, and any acts of genocide during its military operation in Gaza. However, it refrained from mandating a ceasefire.
While the majority of the ICJ bench approved emergency measures, Sebutinde, who is the first female African ICJ judge, voted against all court-ordered measures, including the requirement for Israel to submit a report within a month on its efforts to prevent genocide, as well as the obligation for Israel to ensure basic services for the people of Gaza.
“In my respectful dissenting opinion the dispute between Israel and the people of Palestine is essentially and historically a political one,” Sebutinde said. “It is not a legal dispute susceptible to judicial settlement by the Court,” she added.
According to experts, Sebutinde failed to conduct a thorough assessment of the situation.
Last October, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni said the Gaza conflict was "regrettable" and suggested a Palestinian state as a solution.
In 2022, the ICJ found the Uganda People's Defense Forces (UPDF) guilty of working with rebels in the 1998–2003 Congo war, despite its claims that the Congo conflict was an "international war" with more than eight armies from different countries.
During the ruling, Sebutinde was present as a panel judge and voted "against" Uganda which was ordered to pay Congo $325 million in reparation after it lost the case.
Previously, Sebutinde was a judge of the Special Court for Sierra Leone before she was elected to the ICJ.
 
So , will Turkey and Azerbaijan stop Israeli oil now that ICJ has said that Israel must stop the plausible genocide??
Erdogan will not because he just uses the Palestinian cause to drum up support. He makes a few speeches while he is busy supplying Israel along with the puppet Arab countries.
 
The one committing the ongoing nakba is the one that started the attack. Nakba didn’t end in 1948 but is still going on today with the killings of Palestinians, displacement, land theft, oppression,etc.

Really? It might happened when Palestine started attack, such as year 1967.
 
The United Nations refers the Court of Justice’s decision to the Security Council and confirms that it is binding

The UN Security Council will meet on Wednesday evening to consider the decision of the International Court of Justice, which called on Israel on Friday to prevent any possible act of “genocide” in the Gaza Strip, according to what the French presidency of the Council announced. The spokesman for the United Nations Secretary-General, Stephane Dujarric, said that the Secretary-General, António Guterres, will immediately refer the notification of the interim measures of the International Court of Justice to the UN Security Council. Dujarric added in a press conference that Guterres affirms that the decisions of the International Court of Justice are binding, and he is confident that all parties will abide by them in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the system under which the court was established.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top