Global Naval Power Rankings 2026 - US Navy Retains Top Ranking

ZUMWALT is a failed project, many of its designed capabilities are not realized.

An Arleigh Burke class destroyer does not carry P-8 Poseidon (MPA) or E-2D Hawkeye (AEWC) aircraft. You are talking about capabilities of US navy, not Burke specific.
@Hamartia Antidote
@Fatman17
@Oscar
@Sharma Ji
@Guru Dutt

good day sir
further to my last two posts#185, #194, we have report that the combined strength Korea- Japan - Thailand and other Buddhists countries of East Asia and ASEAN clearly outperform the China in this region. we have "World Fire Power Ranking" for this year as below. :coffee:

its also said that the Combined Buddhist Power, with Bali, keep the Australia on the back foot in Indian Ocean/ in Hind Mahasagar. :coffee:
and yes, the Australian main ports are truelly the Melbourne & Sydney, even the Adelaide in approachable for them. but the Perth/Western Australia in Indian Oceran? its too far from American Sea........
we have ticket price to Singapore from Perth is lesser than Sydney, true 👍
🇮🇳 🇱🇰

1784448992469.png
1784449032402.png
🇮🇳

 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: ety
we have report that the combined strength Korea- Japan - Thailand and other Buddhists countries of East Asia and ASEAN clearly outperform the China in this region. we have "World Fire Power Ranking" for this year as below. :coffee:

its also said that the Combined Buddhist Power, with Bali, keep the Australia on the back foot in Indian Ocean/ in Hind Mahasagar. :coffee:
and yes, the Australian main ports are truelly the Melbourne & Sydney, even the Adelaide in approachable for them. but the Perth/Western Australia in Indian Oceran? its too far from American Sea........
we have ticket price to Singapore from Perth is lesser than Sydney, true 👍
🇮🇳 🇱🇰

View attachment 207020
View attachment 207021
🇮🇳

No need to be combined, Indian air force alone beats China's hands down based on this rankings.
 
Chinese and the US forces were locked in a reconnaissance and electronic warfare tussle in the lead-up to and after US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's trip to Taiwan, according to military sources and defense analysts.

But not all of it was successful, according to sources close to the Chinese military.
State broadcaster CCTV reported the Chinese military used naval and air forces in multiple locations to conduct "full tracking and surveillance" against the US Air Force transport aircraft flying Pelosi and her delegation from Kuala Lumpur to Taipei on August 2.

The tracking was aimed at "deterrence", the report quoted PLA Major General Meng Xiangqing, from the PLA National Defence University, as saying.

However a source said the People's Liberation Army's tracking efforts - which involved jets and Type 055 destroyers - failed.

"The PLA deployed some electronic warfare aircraft such as the J-16D and warships to try to locate Pelosi's aircraft, but were not successful," the source said.

"Almost all the PLA electronic warfare equipment couldn't work properly because they were all jammed by electronic interference by the American aircraft strike group sent by the Pentagon to escort her."

On the flight, Pelosi's aircraft took an unusually circuitous route by heading southeast towards the Indonesian part of Borneo, then turning north to fly along the eastern part of the Philippines.

He Yuan Ming, an independent airpower analyst, said it was not surprising that the Chinese vessels did not detect the flight.

"Even if the Type 055 (destroyer's) radar is said to be 500km (310 miles), its effective range in the real world would be much less," He said.

"Couple this with the vast operating area as well as the Type 055's relative newness both in terms of its hardware (capabilities) and software (crew), there should be little surprise that the PLA (naval) cruiser could not locate (Pelosi's plane)."

Pelosi's trip was followed by a series of unprecedented PLA war games encircling Taiwan.

On the second day of the exercises, the US sent at least seven reconnaissance and early warning aircraft to waters near Taiwan, according to the Beijing-based South China Sea Strategic Situation Probing Initiative.

The deployment included a RC-135V and RC-135S for missile surveillance, three P-8A maritime anti-submarine planes, three E-3G spy jets and one U-2S high-altitude monitor plane, supported by six KC-135 refueling aircraft.

:ROFLMAO:
More powerful and advanced than Burkes Yu say?
He's extremely biased of course completely ignoring US naval power. But that's what hyper-nationalists do
 
He's extremely biased of course completely ignoring US naval power. But that's what hyper-nationalists do
These forum fanboys are dense and all they see is new shiny toys and think it has to be better and forget that thee most important part is combined arms/ joint-command capabilities of your arm forces under high-tech conditions of which PLAN/PLA are decades behind US.
 
These forum fanboys are dense and all they see is new shiny toys and think it has to be better and forget that thee most important part is combined arms/ joint-command capabilities of your arm forces under high-tech conditions of which PLAN/PLA are decades behind US.
Lol, not as much fanboys as arrogant Yanks.
 
These forum fanboys are dense and all they see is new shiny toys and think it has to be better and forget that thee most important part is combined arms/ joint-command capabilities of your arm forces under high-tech conditions of which PLAN/PLA are decades behind US.

According to the French magazine Le Figaro, China has launched five fast-attack nuclear submarines in the first six months of 2026.


Two Type 09X(095A) - 12,000 tons
One Type 095 - 10,000 tons
Two Type 093B - 8000 tons
 
According to the French magazine Le Figaro, China has launched five fast-attack nuclear submarines in the first six months of 2026.


Two Type 09X(095A) - 12,000 tons
One Type 095 - 10,000 tons
Two Type 093B - 8000 tons
These arrogant thick faced people just can't accept others are better than their country in some areas.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top