Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hangor is based on the Type 39B upgrade. The displacement is much higher than 2800, and that will become clear later. I believe 2 of the 6 tubes are 660mm. We will know these details in a bit. I am finding out; if known, they will be shared. Standby pleaseThis phased approach allows Pakistan Navy to absorb new technologies, train successive crews, and build domestic expertise in submarine construction and sustainment.
Technical Parameters
The Hangor-class submarines are based on the Chinese Type-039A Yuan-class, adapted for Pakistan’s requirements.
Displacement: ~2,800 tons submerged.
Length: ~76 meters; Beam: 8.4 meters.
Speed: 20 knots; Range: ~2,000 nautical miles.
Crew complement: ~36 officers and sailors.
Armament: Six 533 mm torpedo tubes capable of launching heavyweight torpedoes, anti-ship cruise missiles, and potentially the Babur-III submarine-launched cruise missile (SLCM), giving Pakistan a credible second-strike capability.
Training and Induction
To prepare for induction, Pakistan received one Type-039A submarine from China gratis for crew training. This allowed Pakistani submariners to acclimate to AIP operations, stealth tactics, and advanced combat systems.
Karachi Shipyard has expanded its infrastructure—new construction halls, drydock facilities, and Syncrolift systems—to support domestic assembly and long-term sustainment. This transfer of technology ensures Pakistan will not only operate but also maintain and eventually upgrade its submarine fleet indigenously.
I can't be certain. However, there is a high possibility that Pakistan could acquire the YU-6, because this is the model most suitable for equipping and transferring technology to Pakistan.Is Pakistan really getting Yu6??
Any anti-ship missile poses a threat to a ship.Incorrect, try again, there are reloads, and yes, 6 cruise missiles coming at you would even test a USN battle group let alone the rust bucket IN carriers
Any anti-ship missile poses a threat to a ship.
The practice of calculating how many anti-ship missiles can be intercepted based on the number of fleet air defense missiles is incorrect. For example, on April 13, 2022, Ukraine announced that two Neptune anti-ship missiles targeted Russia's Moskva. In January 2026, it was officially confirmed that the Moskva was sunk by a missile attack from Ukraine. (The Neptune anti-ship missile has a range of 280 km and is a subsonic missile)
Taking six anti-ship missiles as an example, at least 12-18 air defense missiles are needed for interception. If it is a submarine-launched YJ-18, the interception difficulty is even greater. This is because the YJ-18 flies close to the sea surface, making radar scanning difficult, and these missiles have a terminal speed of over Mach 3. In a test video released in our country, a single YJ-18 can disable a 10,000-ton ship.
Its been determined that Moskva's air defenses were either turned off or non functional, It didn't even know it was being attacked, and it am was a 80s vintage ship not really comparable to modern IN ships with Barak 8s.Any anti-ship missile poses a threat to a ship.
The practice of calculating how many anti-ship missiles can be intercepted based on the number of fleet air defense missiles is incorrect. For example, on April 13, 2022, Ukraine announced that two Neptune anti-ship missiles targeted Russia's Moskva. In January 2026, it was officially confirmed that the Moskva was sunk by a missile attack from Ukraine. (The Neptune anti-ship missile has a range of 280 km and is a subsonic missile)
Taking six anti-ship missiles as an example, at least 12-18 air defense missiles are needed for interception. If it is a submarine-launched YJ-18, the interception difficulty is even greater. This is because the YJ-18 flies close to the sea surface, making radar scanning difficult, and these missiles have a terminal speed of over Mach 3. In a test video released in our country, a single YJ-18 can disable a 10,000-ton ship.
He is correct, non stealth Subsonics don't really pose a big threat to modern warships, if they did PN wouldn't be investing in SMASH or CM-302s it would be content with using harpoons and other subsonicsI know dude, but it is like talking to a 5 year old with that guy...
Its been determined that Moskva's air defenses were either turned off or non functional, It didn't even know it was being attacked, and it was 80s vintage ship not really comparable to modern IN ships with Barak 8s.
He is correct, non stealth Subsonics don't really pose a big threat to modern warships, if they did PN wouldn't be investing in SMASH or CM-302s it would be content with using harpoons and other subsonics
Your calculations are showing ~67m long ships?Pakistan Navy Hangor class submarine was launched at the Submarine base in Sanya, China. The below satellite imagery are from Jan 3, 2026 and most likely one or all 4 Hangor-class subs at this base are of Pakistan Navy's Hangor-Class.
View attachment 195092View attachment 195093View attachment 195094View attachment 195095
We acquired one yuan class training sub from china years ago.Interesting point is that the sub is "commissioned" not 'inducted", meaning the crew had been in china for a long time for training or we had leased a similar Chinese sub to provide full training well before taking the possession. So no waiting time for the active service, Sub is fully active from day one of coming in Pakistani hands.
Your calculations are showing ~67m long ships?
But Hangor is not supposed to be 66-67m long. It's at least 76m long as per reports.
It is 76m long and 3600T ship. It is based on Type 39A export version but Pakistan spec ship, its highly possible we asked for latest technology ship ie the upgraded Type 39B.Hangor is based on the Type 39B upgrade. The displacement is much higher than 2800, and that will become clear later. I believe 2 of the 6 tubes are 660mm. We will know these details in a bit. I am finding out; if known, they will be shared. Standby please
It's the typical Indian mindset. The typical scenario:Not too bright are you?
At 450km range they dont have to get though the defences of anything....
and good luck to IN ships trying to stop a volley of sub launched missiles, not even counting the air launched threat too.
IN carriers have played zero part in any India-Pak confrontation for this very reason and back in May 2025 spent a few hours out of port before fleeing back...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.