India Economy Thread

[GatlingGunZ]

They were literally people in charge of your economy before and are leading your government and economic bodies, suddenly not sensible.... So then prior GDP was not sensible.

It's not a sacred number, and does not need to be treated as such

What their past has to do with anything, when they can't talk on raw data.
India already shrank it's GDP by 3.5% after rebasing in 2026 to remove any discrepancy over 2012-23 as per IMF suggetion.
Now these random two-penny politically motivated jokers whom you revere, can't say that use old data as baseline to measure fresh GDP.

 

[NeptunesVortex]

 

[GatlingGunZ]

Annual production 30,000ton of lithium carbonate by 2030, which can power 1 million 40kwh packs.

 

[Thinking]

India's forex reserves jump $44.90 billion to record $785.71 billion as of September 4

India's foreign exchange reserves reached a record $785.71 billion. This surge followed a significant increase in the previous week. Foreign currency assets saw a substantial rise, contributing most to the growth. Gold reserves, however, experienced a slight decline during this period. Overall...

economictimes.indiatimes.com

there we go..

 

[indo17787]

EU-India FTA: European Commission sends landmark trade deal to council for signature, paving way for ratification

EU-India FTA: European Commission sends landmark trade deal to council for signature, paving way for ratification

The European Commission has asked EU member states for approval to sign and conclude its landmark Free Trade Agreement with India, a deal that would eliminate or reduce tariffs on 96% of EU goods exports and save exporters an estimated €4 billion a year. Once cleared by the Council, the pact...

economictimes.indiatimes.com

 

[Vikramaditya1]

Again, you cannot shut down skepticism on a third world GDP process.



These are your own prominent economic officials, plenty of valid questions raised

They are not very prominent, they are rent an economist types. If they were prominent they would have some logical arguments other than just wild theories.

After a while you gotta wonder how exactly are these numbers fake? They cannot reproduce a viable argument against it. Are export numbers are fake? Forex assets are fake? You cannot fake one thing, you have to fake a series of things to show economic growth is fake.

 

[Vikramaditya1]

EU-India FTA: European Commission sends landmark trade deal to council for signature, paving way for ratification

EU-India FTA: European Commission sends landmark trade deal to council for signature, paving way for ratification

The European Commission has asked EU member states for approval to sign and conclude its landmark Free Trade Agreement with India, a deal that would eliminate or reduce tariffs on 96% of EU goods exports and save exporters an estimated €4 billion a year. Once cleared by the Council, the pact...

economictimes.indiatimes.com

The crying and whining over this is going to be ten fold (from all directions). It'll be bigger than any US trade deal and we have comfortably reached a point of ignoring the US shenanigans.

MF Trump was responsible for our slow export growth, it would've been 1 Trillion in 2027-28.

 

[Vikramaditya1]

They were literally people in charge of your economy before and are leading your government and economic bodies, suddenly not sensible.... So then prior GDP was not sensible.

It's not a sacred number, and does not need to be treated as such

You can google why he was removed. It's an interesting story. He was a secretary in Finance Ministry, it doesn't take much to be Fin secretary you just gotta pass the civil service exam and have a long career even if you are a Social Science major. That's why there are many under secretaries and subject matter experts who "assist" them.

 

[r3alist]

What their past has to do with anything, when they can't talk on raw data.
India already shrank it's GDP by 3.5% after rebasing in 2026 to remove any discrepancy over 2012-23 as per IMF suggetion.
Now these random two-penny politically motivated jokers whom you revere, can't say that use old data as baseline to measure fresh GDP.

Be honest there is no refutation of your holy sacred numbers

After a while you gotta wonder how exactly are these numbers fake?

What a donkey statement

Your data collection and quality is third world
Ignore everything then say there must be an agenda, immature mind

 

[Vikramaditya1]

What a donkey statement

Your data collection and quality is third world
Ignore everything then say there must be an agenda, immature mind

Oh there is actually a third world statistics, it's called eGDDS/GDDS. Countries that follow them probably qualified into your "Third world" data quality.
India follows SDDS prescribed by IMF.

 

[r3alist]

Oh there is actually a third world statistics, it's called eGDDS/GDDS. Countries that follow them probably qualified into your "Third world" data quality.
India follows SDDS prescribed by IMF.

And not well.

You spent every other post before ignoring or denying imf data assessment, just tedious deflection and deception now.

It's not sacred and required belief for everyone

 

[Vikramaditya1]

And not well.

You spent every other post before ignoring or denying imf data assessment, just tedious deflection and deception now.

It's not sacred and required belief for everyone

You spend every post quoting opinions that favour your thought process. Neither IMF not WB prescribes to them, not have they criticized India's data collection process.

So what exactly is your problem?

 

[GatlingGunZ]

Be honest there is no refutation of your holy sacred numbers



What a donkey statement

Your data collection and quality is third world
Ignore everything then say there must be an agenda, immature mind

You are yapping about old news like those Sawhney and Rathee you worship. Stick to timeline.

IMF criticised for delayed rebasing (due to COVID), gave Indian econimic data C grade, India literally corrected it's calculation method in 2026 by rebasing and its gdp shrank by 3% for 2023 . Now IMF applauded Indian methodology.

Follow IMF statement at both instances or don't.

 

[r3alist]

You spend every post quoting opinions that favour your thought process. Neither IMF not WB prescribes to them, not have they criticized India's data collection process.

So what exactly is your problem?

Posted many times and ignored just as many.

Remember you denied all GDP questions at every stage