India foreign policy thread

[Michael]

Google Translate:

Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lin Jian presided over a regular press conference on the 20th.
A reporter asked: India has appointed a widely recognized, veteran "China expert" as its new Ambassador to China. What is China's comment on this?
Lin Jian stated that diplomatic envoys serve as vital bridges for fostering friendly and cooperative relations between nations. I have noted that the Ambassador has already adopted a Chinese name for himself: 魏嘉盟(Pinyin: Wei Jiameng). China welcomes India's new Ambassador to China, 魏嘉盟(Pinyin: Wei Jiameng); we stand ready to provide him with necessary facilitation for assuming his duties in China and look forward to his playing a positive role in promoting the sustained improvement and development of China-India relations following his assumption of office.

=========================================================

IMO.

The newly appointed Indian Ambassador to China is a true "China expert." The Chinese name he chose for himself—"魏嘉盟(Pinyin: Wei Jiameng)"—is a homophone for the phrase "为加盟(Pinyin: Wei Jiameng)" . The underlying implication is: "I have come here to join China."

This type of homophonic metaphor is highly prevalent in Chinese culture.

Such behavior on his part—specifically, this act of self-effacement—serves as an effective way to ingratiate himself with the Chinese people. However, since Indians do not grasp this cultural nuance regarding homophonic metaphors, he remains free to maintain a "haughty" demeanor back home in India.

 

[Yasser76]

View attachment 187044
Google Translate:

Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lin Jian presided over a regular press conference on the 20th.
A reporter asked: India has appointed a widely recognized, veteran "China expert" as its new Ambassador to China. What is China's comment on this?
Lin Jian stated that diplomatic envoys serve as vital bridges for fostering friendly and cooperative relations between nations. I have noted that the Ambassador has already adopted a Chinese name for himself: 魏嘉盟(Pinyin: Wei Jiameng). China welcomes India's new Ambassador to China, 魏嘉盟(Pinyin: Wei Jiameng); we stand ready to provide him with necessary facilitation for assuming his duties in China and look forward to his playing a positive role in promoting the sustained improvement and development of China-India relations following his assumption of office.

=========================================================

IMO.

The newly appointed Indian Ambassador to China is a true "China expert." The Chinese name he chose for himself—"魏嘉盟(Pinyin: Wei Jiameng)"—is a homophone for the phrase "为加盟(Pinyin: Wei Jiameng)" . The underlying implication is: "I have come here to join China."

This type of homophonic metaphor is highly prevalent in Chinese culture.

Such behavior on his part—specifically, this act of self-effacement—serves as an effective way to ingratiate himself with the Chinese people. However, since Indians do not grasp this cultural nuance regarding homophonic metaphors, he remains free to maintain a "haughty" demeanor back home in India.

I do not understand what you are trying to communicate here Michael

 

[Michael]

I do not understand what you are trying to communicate here Michael

The newly appointed Indian Ambassador to China has adopted a Chinese name for himself. This name employs a type of homophonic wordplay that is highly popular in contemporary Chinese linguistic contexts. Its underlying implication is: "I’ve come to join you."

My English isn't very good, so I'm not sure how to translate this particular tone.

 

[Yasser76]

The newly appointed Indian Ambassador to China has adopted a Chinese name for himself. This name employs a type of homophonic wordplay that is highly popular in contemporary Chinese linguistic contexts. Its underlying implication is: "I’ve come to join you."

My English isn't very good, so I'm not sure how to translate this particular tone.

Thank you for explaining

 

[nahtanbob]

authorising Indian to buy sanctioned Russian oil. Rather than inspiring gratitude, American talk of India being allowed to buy Russian oil for 30 days provoked grumbles about India being handed a “chit” by its master. The mood at the talking shop was not helped when America’s deputy secretary of state, Christopher Landau, told his audience that “we are not going to make the same mistakes with India that we made with China 20 years ago in terms of saying, ‘we are going to let you develop all these markets,’ and then, the next thing we know, you are beating us in a lot of commercial things.”​

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Speaking at the Raisina Dialogue in New Delhi, U.S. Deputy Secretary Of State Christopher Landau said the upcoming trade deal with India must be based on reciprocity and fairness. He stressed that the United States will not repeat the mistake it made with China two decades ago by allowing an uneven commercial relationship. Landau said Washington is not entering partnerships for charity but to ensure balanced benefits for both sides.

I do not see the problem here

 

[harpy1]

USA cannot determine the velocity of Indian rise
That is determined by India and how it trades with the world
Notice I said the world
IE
Europe union
Canada
Brazil
Russia
West Asia
China
Asian central
Africa
Yes USA too

Notice the top three they all signed massive trade deals recently

USA needs shut it's big mouth now they are being ignored globally even by the Europeans now
No to USA seems fashionable

 

[Nimble]

See this is how India has always proved what kind of a great neighbor is she..... right now whole world is going through oil crisis...

India herself is a huge crude oil consumer and running on a shortage but didn't forget her neighborhood to help her other neighbors like Sri Lanka and Bangladesh with oil while compromising her own requirements.

India supplies 38 MT fuel to Sri Lanka

संकट के बीच भारत ने श्रीलंका को दिया 38000 मीट्रिक टन पेट्रोल-डीजल, विपक्ष ने भी कहा- धन्यवाद

अमेरिका और इजराइल ने 28 फरवरी से ईरान के खिलाफ संयुक्त हमले शुरू किए जिसने बदले में जवाबी कार्रवाई की। इससे युद्ध पूरे खाड़ी क्षेत्र में फैल गया। होर्मुज जलडमरूमध्य बाधित हुआ जो विश्व की ऊर्जा आपूर्ति के लिए रणनीतिक रूप से महत्वपूर्ण बिंदु है।, International Hindi News - Hindustan

share.google

India supplies 5 MT additional diesel to Bangladesh

संकट की घड़ी में भारत फिर बना बांग्लादेश का तारणहार, भेजा 5000 टन अतिरिक्त डीजल

पश्चिम एशिया संघर्ष के कारण बांग्लादेश में गहराए ईंधन संकट के बीच भारत ने 5000 टन अतिरिक्त डीजल भेजकर बड़ी मदद की है। जानिए 'भारत-बांग्लादेश मैत्री पाइपलाइन' के जरिए कैसे हो रही है यह सप्लाई और क्या है आगे का प्लान।, International Hindi News - Hindustan

share.google

Well done India....

 

[Krptonite]

See this is how India has always proved what kind of a great neighbor is she..... right now whole world is going through oil crisis...

India herself is a huge crude oil consumer and running on a shortage but didn't forget her neighborhood to help her other neighbors like Sri Lanka and Bangladesh with oil while compromising her own requirements.

India supplies 38 MT fuel to Sri Lanka

संकट के बीच भारत ने श्रीलंका को दिया 38000 मीट्रिक टन पेट्रोल-डीजल, विपक्ष ने भी कहा- धन्यवाद

अमेरिका और इजराइल ने 28 फरवरी से ईरान के खिलाफ संयुक्त हमले शुरू किए जिसने बदले में जवाबी कार्रवाई की। इससे युद्ध पूरे खाड़ी क्षेत्र में फैल गया। होर्मुज जलडमरूमध्य बाधित हुआ जो विश्व की ऊर्जा आपूर्ति के लिए रणनीतिक रूप से महत्वपूर्ण बिंदु है।, International Hindi News - Hindustan

share.google

India supplies 5 MT additional diesel to Bangladesh

संकट की घड़ी में भारत फिर बना बांग्लादेश का तारणहार, भेजा 5000 टन अतिरिक्त डीजल

पश्चिम एशिया संघर्ष के कारण बांग्लादेश में गहराए ईंधन संकट के बीच भारत ने 5000 टन अतिरिक्त डीजल भेजकर बड़ी मदद की है। जानिए 'भारत-बांग्लादेश मैत्री पाइपलाइन' के जरिए कैसे हो रही है यह सप्लाई और क्या है आगे का प्लान।, International Hindi News - Hindustan

share.google

Well done India....

If you're helping others, focus on helping

What's with the cringe need to come to a pakistani forum and loudly broadcast what a good samiritan you are

 

[Just Another Indian]

If you're helping others, focus on helping

What's with the cringe need to come to a pakistani forum and loudly broadcast what a good samiritan you are

How will the good Pakistanis know if you don't post about it?

 

[Beijingwalker]

China's Rise, America's Decline, and India's Relationship with China

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[peacemaker99]

India rejected latest offer by P5 for permanent seat without veto. But full veto after 15 years is acceptable, i think it should be 8 or 10 years. Guess its clear that permanent seat will be coming, lots of fighting left, of course

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Feroze]

I think Pakistan or Saudi Arabia should have UNSC Permanent seat with veto.

 

[Blain2]

There are no more permanent members to be added. That ship sailed in the 1940s. The P-5 will never let it happen. Everything else is just attempts to pacify Africans, Indians and Brazilians.

For as long as the UN remains, no further permanent members with veto power will be let into the exclusive club.

 

[Sam6536]

There are no more permanent members to be added. That ship sailed in the 1940s. The P-5 will never let it happen. Everything else is just attempts to pacify Africans, Indians and Brazilians.

For as long as the UN remains, no further permanent members with veto power will be let into the exclusive club.

Russian veto is our proxy for now just like it was with the USSR.

And yes the big boy club is already full. Third world approach to international law is not really welcome among the P5, if they give veto to India others will ask for the same.

If they begin giving exclusive right to everyone there would be no exclusivity left. UN just like the League of Nations is a forum for the powerful. Now in the next few decades the inclusion of powers of the past like the UK and Russia is debatable.

 

[Distant_Observer]

There are no more permanent members to be added. That ship sailed in the 1940s. The P-5 will never let it happen. Everything else is just attempts to pacify Africans, Indians and Brazilians.

For as long as the UN remains, no further permanent members with veto power will be let into the exclusive club.

It will be reformed in time.

India will not be getting a veto. They are far too unhinged.