Raj-Hindustani
Elite Member
Do you understand Potential areas:
also i said, any transfer Or further understanding, will require another agreements
India joins the GCAP programme as a dialogue partner
- Thread starter Indos
- Start date
also i said, any transfer Or further understanding, will require another agreements
Ali_Baba
VIP Member
Potential Area's = "Horsehit".
It is fantasy copium by Indians engaged collectively in their mass self delusion.
There is NOTHING India brings to the table that the GCAP programme needs. Canada, Australia, Poland make far better dialogue and observer partners as they are all very capable technically, far more than India.
Raj-Hindustani
Elite Member
Sir, what was brought by Pakistan to China during JF-17 development? Did Pakistan even design before a trainer aircraft?
India is not currently a core GCAP development partner, and that dialogue status doesn't guarantee technology transfer or a purchase. But saying India brings ‘nothing’ to the table, or that Canada, Australia and Poland are ‘far more capable technically than India’ across the board, is an unsupported generalisation. India has substantial indigenous fighter development programmes, aerospace, missile, radar and systems-development capabilities. The relevant question is what specific capability GCAP would seek from India, not whether India is technically capable at all?
After WWII, both the US and Soviet Union made extensive use of captured German aircraft technology, research, equipment and engineering expertise. This became one of several inputs into their rapidly developing post-war aerospace programmes, alongside their own substantial indigenous research. Some of this knowledge and technology also influenced the development of aerospace capabilities in other countries, including China.
The point is that no country becomes an advanced aerospace power overnight. Everyone has to start somewhere, learn, acquire knowledge, build an industrial base, and progressively develop indigenous expertise. What matters is not simply what a country can bring to the table today, but what it is capable of developing and contributing over time.
Last edited:
Ali_Baba
VIP Member
Not much, other than requirements, and small allocation of engineering staff. No one on this forum has any illusions about Pakistan's technical engineering contribution!
You claim "lost of experience" and "capability, but look at the piss poor development projects of the Tejas, the Arjun, the HJT-36 to name a few, to understand Indian's simply cannot design and develop products for operational deployment. Your history of lack of achievements speak for themselves.
Yes - lots of trophy projects, but so little of these projects make it to operational deployment on time, or even at all.
Your history of lack of achievements speak for themselves...
India is not capable of much, given your history of lack of achievements to date..
GCAP is going quite well, and it only natural for lots of "pretenders" to try and jump onto the bandwagon, and India is one of those pretenders. The core partners of the programme know India is that pretender and won't allow India anywhere near anything. That is why India has been relegated to the tea and biscuit forum...
All of these countries were able to learn, and develop new products on their own. India has been doing license builds and TOT projects since the 50's but still cannot design and deploy platforms itself. Look at how late Türkiye started compared to India in developing its own platforms and the successfully deploying them to operational use. Türkiye have overtaken you soo quickly...
Your history of lack of achievements speak for themselves...
Nimble
Registered Member
Look at our achievements of our space program, warships building, nuclear submarines, ballistic and cruise missiles, nuclear program.... you can only dream of such achievements yet you talk as if we are nothing.... yes some failures or delays are there but that doesn't mean we learnt nothing.....
Raj-Hindustani
Elite Member
I think you're missing my point.
Take China as an example. It took them decades, probably 50+ years, of manufacturing, licensed production, reverse engineering and even cloning earlier aircraft before they were able to develop increasingly advanced aircraft of their own with the starting J10 aircraft. Even the fighter-engine problem took them many years to overcome.
Nothing is a piece of cake when you're trying to build an advanced aircraft from scratch. If it were that easy, more than 4–5 countries would already be independently designing and developing advanced fighters.
Everyone has to start from somewhere. First you manufacture, then you learn, improve, develop your own technologies and eventually become capable of designing your own systems.
So saying “India has nothing to bring to the table” compared with Australia, Canada or Poland doesn't really make sense either. Those countries have their own strengths, but that doesn't mean they are independently more capable than India in every aspect of advanced fighter development. India has been building its own aerospace and fighter-development capability for decades
nahtanbob
Elite Member
India joins the GCAP programme as a dialogue partner
By Fabrice Wolf
08/30/2026
India has obtained dialogue partner status in the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP), led by the United Kingdom, Japan and Italy. This opening comes as New Delhi pursues its Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) and simultaneously seeks to contain the numerical and technological growth of China’s air forces.
Its participation in GCAP does not call this national programme into question, but it now puts Indian officials in contact with a 6th-generation combat aircraft expected around 2035.
India joins the GCAP programme as a dialogue partner
India has gained GCAP dialogue partner status while pursuing the AMCA and assessing options to counter China’s next-generation combat aircraft.meta-defense.fr
it means the aircraft is available to India to buy.
the amount of hand wringling and stomach churning is beyond belief
nahtanbob
Elite Member
the level of cope is beyond belief
The aircraft is available to India to purchase as of now. you cannot say if the decision will stay the same at the time of purchase.
now the program has not even started. Let alone be successful
Ali_Baba
VIP Member
Yes - India should be able to purchase the plane off the shelf once it has been developed, I don't see that being a problem.
Ali_Baba
VIP Member
Yes - India should be able to purchase the plane off the shelf once it has been developed, I don't see that being a problem.
The program is well into it development, with the first technology demonstrator due to fly in 2027.
The assertion that India has anything to offer to a 6th Gen platform programme when it can't even sort out its own 4th gen platform after 30+ years of tinkering is the absurdity that was being peddled, and being challenged for the horseshit that it is.
nahtanbob
Elite Member
you are assuming it is going to be successful
Ali_Baba
VIP Member
Why do you think it can't be ?
Nimble
Registered Member
Just see the hateful posts for no reason just because India is invited as a dialogue partner.... can't they never speak anything about India in any decent way...
nahtanbob
Elite Member
Success is not assured. Otherwise Europeans would be flying 5th generation combat aircraft
Ali_Baba
VIP Member
No European country attempted to build a 5th generation platform. They have decided to go from 4/4.5 gen to 6th generation. Tempest(GCAP) is being built now and will fly in 2027.
Aerospace industry in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia
The UK is the second-largest national aerospace industry in the world (behind the United States) and the largest in Europe by turnover
The UK accounts for roughly 13% of global aerospace original equipment manufacturer (OEM) supply chains
Don't confuse assembled platforms with what the UK supplies to the aerospace industry as a whole.
The UK is an aviation powerhouse. If you don't think that, then there is not much value in any conversation on this front with you.
Tempest will fly. It has the UK, Italy and Japan backing it industrially and technologically.
Last edited:
