Metal 0-1
Registered Member
this the best you guys can do, if someone's off the script. Must be IndianStarted to think your last name is Patel, what of it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
this the best you guys can do, if someone's off the script. Must be IndianStarted to think your last name is Patel, what of it?
this the best you guys can do, if someone's off the script. Must be Indian
this the best you guys can do, if someone's off the script. Must be Indian
No, the best I can do is you inserting posts about dead PAF pilots into the IAF crash thread and now questioning the credibility of a well respected writer on the PAF you seem to know very little about. You then have a pop at posters who respect Warnes.
I can smell that a mile off Apu.
against what?!!!this the best you guys can do, if someone's off the script. Must be Indian
Maybe if you had read couple of previous post someone's inquired about which PAF jet was crashed in March 2020. And why are you being so butthurt over a journalist. He doesn't even know you exist. What a simpNo, the best I can do is you inserting posts about dead PAF pilots into the IAF crash thread and now questioning the credibility of a well respected writer on the PAF you seem to know very little about. You then have a pop at posters who respect Warnes.
I can smell that a mile off Apu.
He is a jeet apu to be precise. Always suspect when they start arguing in certain topics.
Completely wrong.
There are ample reasons for UNDERSTATING total kills, not least diplomatic ones.
I am amazed at the naivety of so many posters today.
It is entirely logical to initially understate kills to allow room for one's enemy to manoeuvre diplomatically if they want a ceasefire. Remember, there was a 300km exclusion zone after the kills, ostensibly because the IAF were grounded. I think we can be assured that India had few military options left after air dominance was attained by PAF, and Brahmos saturation was one of them (remember, their Navy bugged out also).
PAF's credibility is categorically not harmed by slowly revealing additional kills.
Now, that aside, the decision to give India a ceasefire is a political one, and that is a different matter that requires its own scrutinisation. Likewise, any political instruction to "show restraint" requires independent scrutiny.
Maybe if you had read couple of previous post someone's inquired about which PAF jet was crashed in March 2020. And why are you being so butthurt over a journalist. He doesn't even know you exist. What a simp
Ofc Daddy Warnsey said it, must be true.
Never question anything got it
I didn't made any claims. lol.against what?!!!
your mental delusions..
go find evidence of your claims first!
I didn't made any claims. lol.
Your pea sized brain can't comprehend a what I'm saying.
I'm saying is we have photos of 1x Rafale, 1x Mig-29, 1x Su-30, 1x M-2000. Now claim is for total of 3x Rafale. Tatal aircraft 6. Believable sure. I also believe that number.
Now the far fetched claims after a month doesn't make any sense. PAF didn't do a proper BDA which Indians did. All I want PAF is to do a proper BDA. I don't care if Pakistan managed to hit a tree. But for the sake of credibility and for the sake of personnel and children lost in Indian attacks. A proper BDA is a must.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.