Mighty_Dragon_Strike
Trusted Member
who bloody cares, what they show on air shows and screens!
for first 40 days, there was a complete denial about a single jet loss, let alone many!
zero credibility!
India Lucky Not To Lose More Than Four Rafales
- Thread starter Windjammer
- Start date
who bloody cares, what they show on air shows and screens!
for first 40 days, there was a complete denial about a single jet loss, let alone many!
zero credibility!
Oscar
Moderator
If they have shown visual proof of the jet in a latest video - then PAF has no claim of it.
Now Pakistani side could claim it is altered serial and whatnot.
Olympus81
Trusted Member
The IAF can very well switch tail numbers with other Rafales and debunk this.
There is no point harping too much on Rafales being shot down.
Better prepare for the next round and address the shortcomings in PAF, PA, PN.
There is no point harping too much on Rafales being shot down.
Better prepare for the next round and address the shortcomings in PAF, PA, PN.
Princeps
Registered Member
There seems to be some confusion. The serials that have been spotted are BS-023 and BS-024. While PAF or rather Alan's claims are 021, 022, 027 which are yet to be seen.
I was replying to some other claim of BS-023 being damaged beyond repair which doesn't seem to be the case.
Oscar
Moderator
Then the whoever made that claim is wrong
just saying mate this isnt true. You can have active RF decoys.
ThoroughPro
Registered Member
2x18=36
36-6=30
30+114=144
144/18=8
math works
36-6=30
30+114=144
144/18=8
math works
flyingorca
Registered Member
Used old archive clips. Just because a journalist is present at the base old videos could be played.
flyingorca
Registered Member
Or old archive video being used.
Princeps
Registered Member
Then surely you can find the old archive clips to prove that they are old
Faani83
Registered Member
Pakistan Issues 4 Rafale Jets Tail Numbers Allegedly Shot in Battle After Operation Sindoor | LIVEIn this gripping video, we dive into the escalating tensions between Pakistan and India following Operation Sindoor, where Pakistan claims to have shot down four Indian Rafale jets, releasing tail numbers (BS001, BS021, BS022, BS027) as evidence. We explore the conflicting narratives, with India denying these losses and experts debunking Pakistan’s claims, citing a lack of verifiable proof. The video analyzes the strategic implications of this alleged air battle, Pakistan’s use of Chinese-made J-10C jets and PL-15 missiles, and India’s precision strikes on terror camps. Join us as we uncover the truth behind the propaganda, examine social media reactions, and discuss the evolving dynamics of modern warfare. Don’t miss this deep dive into a critical geopolitical flashpoint!
flyingorca
Registered Member
gamaji
Registered Member
This ignorant Indian host is claiming that this Pak-Saudi agreement is the first one in world to provide nuke umbrella to a non-nuclear country. But then what is Nato and what was the Warsaw pact?
Nuclear weapons were deployed in non-nuclear states across Western Europe (and probably are still deployed) under Nato.
Soviets provided nuclear umbrella to Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, and Romania under the warsaw pact.
Why Pak-Saudi pact is first such pact then?
Last edited:
Hakikat ve Hikmet
VIP Member
The problem is President Trump has picked up from where the PAF left....
A nod to the Pak-KSA defense pact is even a greater shock....
