India Moves to Join France’s FCAS Sixth-Generation Fighter Programme After Germany’s Exit

It was cancelled largely because France and Germany had increasingly different requirements for the future fighter.

For example, France wanted the aircraft to be capable of operating from its future aircraft carrier, while Germany had no such requirement. This contributed to differences in the aircraft's design, size, weight and overall configuration.

These differences, combined with the Dassault–Airbus workshare dispute, ultimately made the joint fighter program unworkable.

But Indian requirements are the same as France's, more closely matching!

Regarding AMCA -AMCA is India’s indigenous 5th-gen fighter program and should continue independently. At the same time, India can work with France on 6th-gen technology. Both can go together—AMCA for self-reliance, and French collaboration for additional technology and learning that can help India build future-generation fighters.


India wants the technology transfer and Dassault know this.
If Dassault cannot share technology with Germany a NATO and Eu member. India has little chance. Main reason why Germany has walked away from this program.
 
India wants the technology transfer and Dassault know this.
If Dassault cannot share technology with Germany a NATO and Eu member. India has little chance. Main reason why Germany has walked away from this program.
Technology transfer/IP was one of the major unresolved issues, alongside other major issues – leadership, workshare and different aircraft requirements
 
Technology transfer/IP was one of the major unresolved issues, alongside other major issues – leadership, workshare and different aircraft requirements

And how will India be able to resolve these even on the same terms that Germany had, let alone better? It can't, right? It will be safe to assume that what India is getting on board is local assembly and a local paint job at best..
 
And how will India be able to resolve these even on the same terms that Germany had, let alone better? It can't, right? It will be safe to assume that what India is getting on board is local assembly and a local paint job at best..
India should negotiate the deal in a similar way to Rafale deal—push for local manufacturing, integration of Indian weapons and systems, and maximum possible local production of components. India may not get full technology or IP transfer, but it should negotiate to get as much know-how, manufacturing capability and industrial experience as possible.

For example, when India leased the Soviet nuclear-powered submarine INS Chakra in the late 1980s, the Soviet Union imposed restrictions on Indian access to certain sensitive technologies and systems. Soviet personnel retained control or access to some highly classified areas and equipment, while Indian crews were trained to operate the submarine.

However, INS Chakra gave India valuable hands-on experience in operating nuclear-powered submarines. Russian technical assistance and design knowledge, combined with India's own R&D, helped India develop the Arihant-class SSBNs.

Expecting too much from France or any third country to transfer sensitive technology is unrealistic.
 
India should negotiate the deal in a similar way to Rafale deal—push for local manufacturing, integration of Indian weapons and systems, and maximum possible local production of components. India may not get full technology or IP transfer, but it should negotiate to get as much know-how, manufacturing capability and industrial experience as possible.

For example, when India leased the Soviet nuclear-powered submarine INS Chakra in the late 1980s, the Soviet Union imposed restrictions on Indian access to certain sensitive technologies and systems. Soviet personnel retained control or access to some highly classified areas and equipment, while Indian crews were trained to operate the submarine.

However, INS Chakra gave India valuable hands-on experience in operating nuclear-powered submarines. Russian technical assistance and design knowledge, combined with India's own R&D, helped India develop the Arihant-class SSBNs.

Expecting too much from France or any third country to transfer sensitive technology is unrealistic.


Let's face it, France n Dassault, have always been control freaks n not really willing to compromise their technology, which is understandable. But this leads to them always going alone 🇫🇷

Like Ali_Baba explained it you.

You cant expect a foreign country like France to share its most cutting edge technology unless you are Real Tier 1 partner like them.
 
India should negotiate the deal in a similar way to Rafale deal—push for local manufacturing, integration of Indian weapons and systems, and maximum possible local production of components. India may not get full technology or IP transfer, but it should negotiate to get as much know-how, manufacturing capability and industrial experience as possible.

For example, when India leased the Soviet nuclear-powered submarine INS Chakra in the late 1980s, the Soviet Union imposed restrictions on Indian access to certain sensitive technologies and systems. Soviet personnel retained control or access to some highly classified areas and equipment, while Indian crews were trained to operate the submarine.

However, INS Chakra gave India valuable hands-on experience in operating nuclear-powered submarines. Russian technical assistance and design knowledge, combined with India's own R&D, helped India develop the Arihant-class SSBNs.

Expecting too much from France or any third country to transfer sensitive technology is unrealistic.

How many local manufacturing/TOT projects/IP transfer projects does India need? You have been doing them since the late 50's and still have not been able to use it effectively before the knowledge becomes obsolete and you then have to ask for TOT again ??

What is the point?
 
How many local manufacturing/TOT projects/IP transfer projects does India need? You have been doing them since the late 50's and still have not been able to use it effectively before the knowledge becomes obsolete and you then have to ask for TOT again ??

What is the point?



India has failed miserably in all its attempts efforts to learn absolutely anything Paying hundreds billions for TT With the Russians and others .

Look what Chinese did with Russian su-27 turned it into essentially a brand new aircraft j16 . China has surpassed Russia and west in Naval , aircraft etc. So impressive how they learned from their humble experience learning from buying Russian military equipment.
 
India has failed miserably in all its attempts efforts to learn absolutely anything Paying hundreds billions for TT With the Russians and others .

Look what Chinese did with Russian su-27 turned it into essentially a brand new aircraft j16 . China has surpassed Russia and west in Naval , aircraft etc. So impressive how they learned from their humble experience learning from buying Russian military equipment.

Look at Türkiye, how many successful projects they have had and look at their aerospace history. India should be miles ahead of Turkiye but they are not, they are still stuck in 2nd gear and do not look like they can move up a gear at this rate.
 
India has failed miserably in all its attempts efforts to learn absolutely anything Paying hundreds billions for TT With the Russians and others .

Look what Chinese did with Russian su-27 turned it into essentially a brand new aircraft j16 . China has surpassed Russia and west in Naval , aircraft etc. So impressive how they learned from their humble experience learning from buying Russian military equipment.
Economy speakes , we are not that much economic strong as china simple .
Many countries operates Russian aircraft does not mean they will learn how to make aircraft.
 
Economy speakes , we are not that much economic strong as china simple .
Many countries operates Russian aircraft does not mean they will learn how to make aircraft.



National humiliation

Not even an working indigenous plane 😮

I guess why you bought Rafals Migs mirages.
 
National humiliation

Not even an working indigenous plane 😮

I guess why you bought Rafals Migs mirages.
Industrial depth is increasing, economy growth is happening at good pace , soon u will see more bright future for india 🇮🇳.
 
Industrial depth is increasing, economy growth is happening at good pace , soon u will see more bright future for india 🇮🇳.
I heard the same 20 years ago here.

Many older people will say they been hearing that for 80years since independence.

At some stage you got to just produce results and not tell us to wait for future.
 
I heard the same 20 years ago here.

Many older people will say they been hearing that for 80years since independence.

At some stage you got to just produce results and not tell us to wait for future.
I also heard china will overtake usa in 2028 😂
 
I also heard china will overtake usa in 2028 😂
I heard 2049 but we all know your indian media is a factory for lies.

China targets 2049, the 100th anniversary of the People's Republic of China, as the milestone to achieve fully developed nation status and become a leading global superpower. [1, 2]
This objective forms the second of Beijing's "Two Centennial Goals," aiming for a prosperous, strong, and modern socialist country. [1]

Core Development Goals for 2049
    • Economic Stature: Transition fully into a high-income, advanced economy with top-tier composite national strength.
    • Tech Leadership: Dominate global innovation in sectors like artificial intelligence, semiconductors, green energy, and smart manufacturing.
    • Intermediate Steps: "Basically" achieve socialist modernization an interim milestone by 2035. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Key Challenges
    • Demographics: Manage a rapidly aging population and shrinking workforce that could strain economic growth.
    • Middle-Income Trap: Overcome structural bottlenecks by shifting reliance from traditional manufacturing and exports to domestic consumption and high-value tech. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top