Indian false flag and current Indo-Pak stand-off updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
r3alist said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Solid defence, sky not sympathetic, a few bouncers
Click to expand...

Has a history of staging such attacks.. he said of India.

What might he have been referring to there, 26/11 ? Pulwama ? Pathankot ? .. all of them ?

Where did he get that 3000 detained number ?

I found this, but this is post abrogation of 370


found this:

https://www.greaterkashmir.com/kash...eading-information-on-social-media-platforms/

^quick google results, share if you have sources on 4 thousand arrested because Pehalgam.
 
Meengla said:
Saw on an India website itself: The attackers had a lot of 'local support'.
Indians should really worry if a war makes into IoK itself!
Click to expand...

Its getting pretty clear now there were no Pakistanis involved. The attackers were all locals. Satellite phones isn't some secret tech that only Pakistan could have provided them.

This is why India is running away from neutral investigation.
 
Kaise kaise namak haram suw*r palay hain iss mulk ne

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Prognostications said:
They are calling us on their own
Click to expand...
Wow. That must be giving you reason to masterbate. Stroke and pat a little Indian on its back like a poodle and you’re fine and dandy.
Apologies I can’t take your posts seriously anymore. Just making me laugh…
 
ARMalik said:
Ok members, I have another Theory on why India did this false flag operation and blamed Pakistan. I request some patience from you and to go through the following points carefully. I am very sure that once you have read these points, you will have much better understanding of what I am saying.

1- Russia has cleared Kursk of Ukraine special forces. Russia now has captured all the key areas in Eastern Ukraine. As part of this Putin declared a VICTORY DAY to be celebrated on 9 May this month.

2- As part of the Victory day celebrations, Putin invited President Xi of China, and Indian PM Modi to attend Victory Day celebrations. President Xi ACCEPTED Putin's invitation and Xi will attend the Victory Day. However till NOW, Modi PROVIDED NO RESPONSE to this invitation.

3- The reason Modi provided no response was due to the fact that He was getting a LOT OF PRESSURE from US/EU/UK to not go to Russia. They threatened him.

4- To get out of Putin's invitation Modi wanted to come up with SOMETHING that would save India's relation with Russia and also save India's relation with the West.

5- Terrorist Drama was the MOST convenient and the most effective way to get out of this invitation. After this Drama, Modi NOW HAS CANCELLED HIS VISIT TO RUSSIA CITING "HEIGHTENED TENSIONS WITH PAKISTAN".

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

PM Modi to skip Russia's invitation, not to visit Moscow for May 9 celebrations | India News - The Times of India

India News: Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to attend Russia's Victory Day Parade in Moscow on May 9, as confirmed by Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov. This de
timesofindia.indiatimes.com timesofindia.indiatimes.com


View attachment 115920

www.euractiv.com

EU warns neighbours off attending Moscow victory parade - Euractiv

So far, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico is the only EU leader that will attend Putin's Victory Day celebration.
www.euractiv.com www.euractiv.com
Click to expand...

My theory is simple… the BJP government has been discussing the suspension of the Indus Water Treaty for at least the past five years, and they may have been waiting for a solid justification to do so. Moreover, India appears confident in its ability to win a war, given that its military budget exceeds Pakistan’s entire national budget. While both nations would fight fiercely, a prolonged conflict lasting several months would likely place significant financial strain on Pakistan. With over $600 billion in foreign reserves, India has a financial cushion that could help sustain a lengthy war and fund additional military equipment. They may believe that, with much of the world already engaged in other conflicts, this is an opportune moment to assert themselves.

This presents a factual scenario that seemingly favours India. However, in real world, how many wars have been decisively won by the more powerful nation in the past 200 years? Wars aren’t won by sheer firepower alone… strategy and alliances play a critical role. Pakistan has a strong ally in China, which could supply virtually unlimited ammunition if it aligns with their strategic interests. India, on the other hand, may be overplaying its hand by acting aggressively and could be making a grave miscalculation if it chooses the path of war.
 
There's some update on Rafael j10c incident.
IAF sent 2 rafale and MKI each. PAF had blk 3 and MLU in the area backed by erieye and ew assets. IAF assets were hot I.e. armed so they weren't just patrolling. Erieye passed radar data upon which blk 3 equipped with pl15s locked on one of the 2 rafales after which IAF assets escaped the area.
No j10c were patrolling at that time.
 
Something is going on over Islamabad. Airliners are circling. Training?

1746107580557.png
 
any idea if there is a simulator like this?
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
X said:
This presents a factual scenario that seemingly favours India. However, in real world, how many wars have been decisively won by the more powerful nation in the past 200 years? Wars aren’t won by sheer firepower alone… strategy and alliances play a critical role. Pakistan has a strong ally in China, which could supply virtually unlimited ammunition if it aligns with their strategic interests. India, on the other hand, may be overplaying its hand by acting aggressively and could be making a grave miscalculation if it chooses the path of war.
Click to expand...

Yes, China is probably the biggest factor here: A land border with Pakistan and plenty of reasons especially now for China to cripple India's economy. But even if China was not a factor, Pakistan's weaker economy actually works against India as India would have a lot more to lose--a LOT more to lose. We are not in the First World War trenches warfare era where soldiers would be fighting each other for years and only the one with stronger economy would prevail. Just recently the resistance in Gaza majorly dented a major rich economy like Israel's to the point that had it not been sustained American support, the Israeli economy would have taken even worse hits.
 
Meengla said:
Yes, China is probably the biggest factor here: A land border with Pakistan and plenty of reasons especially now for China to cripple India's economy. But even if China was not a factor, Pakistan's weaker economy actually works against India as India would have a lot more to lose--a LOT more to lose. We are not in the First World War trenches warfare era where soldiers would be fighting each other for years and only the one with stronger economy would prevail. Just recently the resistance in Gaza majorly dented a major rich economy like Israel's to the point that had it not been sustained American support, the Israeli economy would have taken even worse hits.
Click to expand...
How I see is, if Pakistan and India goes for full scale war, both countries will perish and poverty will return in both countries once again. That is before a third nation comes to help Pakistan or India. Welcome back to 1947
 
Be dazzled said:
There's some update on Rafael j10c incident.
IAF sent 2 rafale and MKI each. PAF had blk 3 and MLU in the area backed by erieye and ew assets. IAF assets were hot I.e. armed so they weren't just patrolling. Erieye passed radar data upon which blk 3 equipped with pl15s locked on one of the 2 rafales after which IAF assets escaped the area.
No j10c were patrolling at that time.
Click to expand...

PAF seems to have a lot of confidence in the JF17C Block III's to face off Rafales so directly.
 
r3alist said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



She asked the same question again and again

This is a pro India guy...not gonna alienate Pakistan


Nada
Click to expand...

The dothead didn't get the answers she was looking for.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 13 (members: 0, guests: 13)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top