Indian false flag and current Indo-Pak stand-off updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

You can refer to this page, this war had the largest tank to tank battle post WW2.

In 1971 too there were a lot of engagements on both the sides.

I don't know how you according to your logic these weren't "large scale wars".
Air force, navy and army all 3 wings bought on both sides in this war.

Comparatively Indo China war never devolved in a full scale war, it was just a skirmish.
Based on different experiences and concepts, we have completely different classification standards.

Sino-Vietnamese War.
Whether it is the intensity of the war, the scale of the war, or the duration of the war, it exceeds any modern war in Indian history. (Vietnam's terrain is not suitable for armored vehicle combat, so their number of participants is less than the Indo-Pakistani War)

However, in China's evaluation, it is still a general war and has not reached the "battle-level war".

In the entire Korean War, only a few battles reached the "battle-level war".

During the Kuomintang-Communist Civil War, only a few battles reached the "battle-level war".

The 1965 Indo-Pakistani War. The intensity of the war between the two sides, the actual combat force, the amount of weapons and ammunition consumed, etc., cannot reach our "battle-level war". (Although the total number of participants in the war on both sides is close to 1 million, the total number of deaths on both sides is only a few thousand, indicating that the intensity of the battle is very low)

In the Chinese context, there are relatively clear distinctions in the classification of wars. Their English translations may be somewhat different.
 
Hasn’t India been helping Israel and US attack Yemen? I think it can be expected that the Houthis will fire a few missiles at Bombay which will crash the stock market. That’s the best way to deliver pain to the Hindu baniyas who bankroll the RSS/BJP.
Houthis have already attacked at least 5 vessels with Indian crews and a missile strike on one of them while they were trying to carry fuel to Israel, as well as taking Indian hostages. they are already no fans of India, at all.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
No help came for free. Pakistan army is there to protect Saudi Royal Family and Makkah Madina from foreign attacks, so we sell our lives for Saudi money and oil.
True. Grand Mosque seizure and subsequent operation done by SSG comes to mind.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Day 161 of hearing Indian politicians yap instead of backing their big talk with some tangible actions.

IMG_20250504_201751_559.jpg
 
If we can ignore Indians talking about it how the war would go for a second, let's just hope it won't come to this. A war between the two would be completely pointless and devastating to the militaries, economies and civilians of both sides. Don't go and say one side will be completely safe in this war as we know that's not gonna happen at all. ☢️ 📻 ☢️
 
It’s easy to keep sharing tweets, but the simple constructive contribution of verifying information can go a long way in enhancing thread quality and decreasing unnecessary quantity (I scroll past 50-60% of posts)
 
If we can ignore Indians talking about it how the war would go for a second, let's just hope it won't come to this. A war between the two would be completely pointless and devastating to the militaries, economies and civilians of both sides. Don't go and say one side will be completely safe in this war as we know that's not gonna happen at all. ☢️ 📻 ☢️
There won't be any war.
Only some airstrikes.
 
Based on different experiences and concepts, we have completely different classification standards.

Sino-Vietnamese War.
Whether it is the intensity of the war, the scale of the war, or the duration of the war, it exceeds any modern war in Indian history. (Vietnam's terrain is not suitable for armored vehicle combat, so their number of participants is less than the Indo-Pakistani War)

However, in China's evaluation, it is still a general war and has not reached the "battle-level war".

In the entire Korean War, only a few battles reached the "battle-level war".

During the Kuomintang-Communist Civil War, only a few battles reached the "battle-level war".

The 1965 Indo-Pakistani War. The intensity of the war between the two sides, the actual combat force, the amount of weapons and ammunition consumed, etc., cannot reach our "battle-level war". (Although the total number of participants in the war on both sides is close to 1 million, the total number of deaths on both sides is only a few thousand, indicating that the intensity of the battle is very low)

In the Chinese context, there are relatively clear distinctions in the classification of wars. Their English translations may be somewhat different.

On my god, another Chinese member descending to show the world how it is done!
 
Musharraf repeatedly threatened nuclear retaliation, yet India continued bombing Pakistani positions with full impunity. Nawaz Sharif later revealed that around 4,000 Pakistani soldiers were martyred in the Kargil conflict. To this day, Pakistan Army continues to hide the true number of casualties from Kargil.
Moron
First patalputra then Bhojpuranchali then Magadh and now this ID?
We as a defence forum allow opposing views and a solid debate but to have 4 IDs and then start talking total crap on this thread - it’s time to wear a pink sari on this ID and go create a new one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top