Indian false flag and current Indo-Pak stand-off updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sam6536 said:
You can refer to this page, this war had the largest tank to tank battle post WW2.
Click to expand...

Do you know about the fourth Middle East war? Syria alone had 1,400 tanks in the war.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


I dont know what the f is this? False flag? Or just India tactically abandoning popular tourism spot for militant attack?

Militants attacks didnt stop after 2019. They just didnt kill as many.

So militants are killing civilians and Indian army stay back to avoid casualties? What competence.
 
Waz said:
You are obviously quite young or just seriously not well researched. The entire might of the USAF along with allied NATO air forces could not stop Saddam's forces from launching SCUD missiles into neighbouring countries during Desert Storm. There were 46 fired into Saudi Arabia and 42 into Israel. The coalition manged to take out 100 eventually;


Read this;

A-10 strike aircraft flew over these zones during the day, and F-15E's fitted with LANTRIN pods and synthetic aperture radars patrolled at night. However, the infrared signatures and radar sigantures of the Iraqi TELSs were almost impossible to distinguish from ordinary trucks and from the surrounding electromagnetic clutter. During the war, while patrolling, strike aircraft managed to sight mobile TELs on 42 occasions, but only eight times the aircraft were able to locate the targets well enough to release their ordnance. In addition, the Iraqi missile units dispersed their Scud TELs and hid them in culverts, wadis , or under highway bridges. They also practiced "shoot and scoot" tactics, withdrawing the launcher to a hidden location immediately after it had fired, while the launch sequence that usually took 90 minutes was reduced to half an hour. This enabled them to preserve their forces, despite optimistic claims by the coalition. A post-war Pentagon study concluded that relatively few launchers had been destroyed by coalition aircraft



You're seriously deluded if you think your air force can take out even a section of Pakistan's strike capability. Aside hardened silos there are mobile sites, sea based strike etc.
Click to expand...
Yup. Iraqis learned fast. Had to give them credit for that one.

And, those tactics still work today. Ukes have been employing them with their mobile artillery.
 
MH.Yang said:
Do you know about the fourth Middle East war? Syria alone had 1,400 tanks in the war.
Click to expand...
SAA loses were mostly vs ATGM etc, not direct tank vs tank.

This one was Rommel style

Read up, there's some great stories from the conflict.
 
Chandragupt Maurya said:
It’s not easy to legally prove Pakistan’s involvement in terrorist attacks, even when the entire world knows it played a role. Remember Ajmal Amir Kasab—he was caught on CCTV shooting civilians during the Mumbai attacks, and yet it still took over a decade to convict him in the Supreme Court of India. You can’t fight Pakistan or groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda solely through the court of law—these are asymmetric threats that require a different approach.
Click to expand...
Not one iota of proof - not 1 attempt of getting to the bottom - just a test like you on our forum with 4 IDs.
Shove your theories where the sun don’t shine.
India hasn’t gotten the traction it was expecting in the international stage hence the reason today it doesn’t know where to put its face.
 
KingQamaR said:
India wants to be Israel so bad. This is not Gaza, Lebanon , Syria you can not turn tap on and off! Both countries are preparing for war you will not conttol the size of this conflict.
Click to expand...

Yes, and considering that this time Pakistan wants to give a harsher response than the Indian attack(s), the 'escalation ladder' would be more like a rapidly ascending escalator . In case we didn't notice/said: In the latest ISPR / FM joint briefing, Pakistan officially conveyed that Pakistan will not launch a 'pre-emptive' attack. I believe that was done at least partly due to foreign input while some countries, including America, are trying to give face-saving to India. Otherwise, PAF did launch pre-emptive strikes on India in at least one previous war.
Anyway, Pakistanis, maybe first time in their history, are locked and loaded and even WANTING a war but they want India to strike first. As Moeed Yusuf said: "Pakistanis are fed up" with Indian threats!
 
hydrabadi_arab said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


I dont know what the f is this? False flag? Or just India tactically abandoning popular tourism spot for militant attack?

Militants attacks didnt stop after 2019. They just didnt kill as many.

So militants are killing civilians and Indian army stay back to avoid casualties? What competence.
Click to expand...

Not sure from he got the news about 1 and hour because as per the available victim tourists, indian army reached in 20-25 mins
 
Tejas Spokesman said:
There won't be any war.
Only some airstrikes.
Click to expand...
Okay, so you're saying there will only be airstrikes ? Than what ? Pakistan will say thank you, lets go home ? No, Pakistan will do airstrikes on India, then what ? Will India just stand and take it ? Where will it end ?

That is why Modi is being advised not to get into this stupidity just because 20 people died and India cannot even present concrete proofs against Pakistan to anyone. Your case is extremely weak and the whole world will blame India even if India takes such an action.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 17 (members: 0, guests: 17)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top