Indian Navy News & Discussions

[NeptunesVortex]

now, imagine, what this holds for you, when open conflict breaks!

History already answered that question for you. One side ends up permanently altered. Loud and clear. That scar is still raw and bleeding.

 

[White Privilege]

Swiss report, the satellite pics and your own broken air force are saying something completely different. Desert Storm was lopsided because one side had proper planning, better weapons and actually knew how to use air power. Same thing happened to PAF in Sindoor. Calling high value targets just Google Maps coordinates is pure cope from you. Those were high value airbases, command centres, hangars, radars and C2 nodes that got systematically hammered. Independent European analysis from the Swiss CHPM think tank flat-out says that by the morning of 10 May the IAF had achieved air superiority over significant portions of Pakistani airspace.

PAF lost the plot completely because its forward radars got knocked out and the S-400 threat forced their AWACS and standoff platforms to stay well back. Their own strikes were largely thwarted by Indian defences. That’s exactly why Pakistani DGMO came asking for the ceasefire.

IAF hit Nur Khan, Sargodha (runway cratered and the scars are still visible 16 months later), Bholari (hangar smashed, Erieye destroyed), Jacobabad (F-16 hangar hit), Murid C2 UG centre, Rahim Yar Khan and more.

PAF’s ass got handed to it on a platter. Whatever BS you keep shouting about didn’t stop the systematic degradation of your air defence network and infrastructure. Independent sources, satellite proof and the final outcome all say the same thing. Keep coping with the emojis

LOL satellite images only show the hangars' damaged, all that talk of numerous assets presumably inside and completely destroyed is ur own pipe dreaming. Desert storm was a worn out from 8 year war and operationally, economically and doctrinally out of date Iraqi aur force against a huge coalition which was using state of the art equipment and tactics and had endless resources, not really the May scenario.....booooo. And, did your air force attack in the cover of night, through heavy AD guided by dead reckoning in GPS denied environment, and do aerial BDA afterwards, no, it just programmed those munitions and launched from long range, nothing systematic revolutionary Yada Yada yada.....In fact our S-400 mission way way more risky as Thunder had to penetrate inside S-400 engagement zone and survive, u guys admit 'weapon landed close but S-400 had moved' however we know it fried the Cheese board radar,that is a James bond story to be honest....

In fact by your Indian admission, S-400 was 'moving' constantly,which means it was suppressed successfully. You cannot believe your propaganda about its combat effectiveness when we see it smoked so easily in the Ukraine conflict...

Sure IAF had air superiority 400 km inside India where it launched from.. Weapons impact inside Pakistan is no indication of air superiority as I have explained it can also be achieved in a contested one.

DGMO call on 10th was in accordance with the May 7 correspondence, where he said we will stand down after our own response. Infact ur DGMO called us first on May 7th to deescalate, as disclosed in your parliament.....

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

History already answered that question for you. One side ends up permanently altered. Loud and clear. That scar is still raw and bleeding.

Please complete your post or let me write for you!
"just like in Dhrundhar"

 

[CallSignMaverick]

Majority of the world’s air combat missions almost 80% have always been A2G. Actual A2A BVR kills are the rare. Look at any serious war: Desert Storm, coalition AFs flew around 40,000 A2G sorties while real A2A engagements were a tiny fraction. That’s how real air forces operate. Once you have enough control of the sky, the primary mission is to smash the enemy’s bases, radars, command centres, hangars and infras from range.That is the primary mission.

IAF precision strikes systematically tore into PAF from Nur Khan in the north all the way down to Bholari, Jacobabad, Sargodha and the rest. Multiple independent analyses, including European ones concluded that by 10 May the IAF had the freedom to hit whatever it wanted while PAF had lost the ability to mount effective counter ops. That’s what winning the air war looks like in the real world.

Look at your own side. PAF was so severely lacking in proper A2G ground munitions that it had to resort to Fateh-I, Fateh-II and other ground launched rockets and missiles fired by the Pakistani Army. Thats an air force that couldn’t carry the A2G load from the air and had to outsource the job to artillery batteries. When your fighters can’t deliver sustained precision strikes and you start firing Fateh rockets instead, you are the ones who turned into a rocket force, not IAF.

IAF stayed in the actual business of modern air power putting weapons on the targets that matter and dismantling the other side’s ability to fight. PAF got exposed for its thin A2G cupboard and had to lean on ground systems.

You're arguing with those who genuinely believe all of this is 100% real


Same bunch who'd endlessly claim "we can shoot down any and every Indian jet, we can hit any Indian target with Yiha-3, we can destroy all S-400, we can sink all Indian aircraft carriers, ships, submarines" are somehow not retaliating against India everytime "Fitna-al-Hindustan" does something and casualties go into double digits like yesterday's Fidayeen attack the way India has been doing against them.

Fauji foundation knows, their real battle is on reels and social media.