Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Meengla said:
Right! This is what Scott Ritter too complained about just a few weeks ago about the unnecessary wishy-washy posture by the Iranians on their nukes. Compare that with Pakistan: Pakistan started its nuclear weapons program in late January 1972 when Zulfi Bhutto, a month after the Fall of Dhaka in December 1971, thought that Pakistan must have the nukes to counter India in future. The program accelerated when India tested its nukes a few years alter. But Pakistan kept a consistent public stance: Pakistan's nuclear program is for 'peaceful, civilian' purposes and Pakistan kept that public stance right up to May 1998: That's almost three decades of secrecy and consistency!
Click to expand...

There is a huge difference though.

Iranian leadership considers nuclear weapons haram.

We got the nuclear weapons because our leaders had the intention of acquiring them.
 
kobra said:
Hzb has lost too many honourable warriors and family members, I dont think that they are in any position to open the front immediately. Iran should contin to throw 5-10 missiles daily.
Click to expand...

Israel is going to go after south Lebanon up to the Litani River and my guess is it will be VERY soon. Grab, occupy, settle. That area is too close to northern Israel, is too fertile to be ignored by Israel. Israelis are already occupying even more commanding heights in Syria after 'freedom and democracy' came to Syria 6-8 months ago which many idiots here and in the world were celebrating.
 
Dalit said:
There is a huge difference though.
Iranian leadership considers nuclear weapons haram.
We got the nuclear weapons because our leaders had the intention of acquiring them.
Click to expand...

Please read the post which I quoted in my own post. Iranians have been giving stupid mixed signals about the nukes and dithering forever, Fatwah or not.
 
gambit said:
Yeah...Sure...Iran needs %60 enrichment for...uuhhh...'research'.


You can convince someone that you are 'compliant' but that does not mean another person will agree. And that was my point.

Iran have given zero evidence for any legitimate need for %60 enrichment. Iran have no nuclear powered vessels. That leave nuclear warheads. You can scream 'compliant' all you want but it looked like the other guy -- Crump -- called your bluff.
Click to expand...



Can you come up with a reason why
Israel can have nukes but Iran can't?
Especially when they've been attacked by a nuclear power. Two nuclear powers now in fact.
 
RescueRanger said:
Cyprus has a BRITISH Base, Do you want Iran to start a war with NATO and trigger article 5?

Thank god you are not advising the Iranians.
Click to expand...

It was unthinkable to attack the little Western creation called Israel. We often heard that this was the red line that no country in the world could ever cross. Iran has crossed that red line and even normalised bombing Israeli cities on a daily basis. I agree that Iran should continue to attack Israel as long as possible and necessary. Instead of focusing elsewhere.
 
Cesur said:
Iran should also fire some missiles at Cyprus. The bases there are actively being used by multiple countries to support operations against Iran and it serves as a safe haven for tankers and Israeli assets
Click to expand...

Iran should not widen the scope of the strike and give EU countries an excuse to help Israel.

The fact is that it does not matter how many Israeli assets Iran destroys. What is important is for the world to see that the US cannot even protect Israel. Destroying the influence and deterrence of the US and Israel is what the US and Israel fear the most. Iran should attack Israel's media industry, financial districts, rich neighborhoods, landmarks, not military buildings. That would influence the world better.

Iran will have to learn from North Korea in the future. Whenever the North Koreans get upset by the US, they beat up South Korea and then the US backs down. Iran can do the same, whenever the US pisses you off, you bomb Israel. As long as Iran stays the course this time, Iran has the right to beat up Israel whenever it wants.
 
RescueRanger said:
Cyprus has a BRITISH Base, Do you want Iran to start a war with NATO and trigger article 5?

Thank god you are not advising the Iranians.
Click to expand...
Aren’t the British already complicit in this in the form of tankers?

The moment Iran targeted a U.S base in Qatar article 5 technically got triggered anyways.
 
KingQamaR said:
Can you come up with a reason why
Israel can have nukes but Iran can't?
Especially when they've been attacked by a nuclear power. Two nuclear powers now in fact.
Click to expand...
To be honest, it only makes Iranian case for a nuke stronger. However very unlikely now. That time has passed. All eyes are on Iran now.
 
Dalit said:
It was unthinkable to attack the little Western creation called Israel. We often heard that this was the red line that no country in the world could ever cross. Iran has crossed that red line and even normalised bombing Israeli cities on a daily basis. I agree that Iran should continue to attack Israel as long as possible and necessary. Instead of focusing elsewhere.
Click to expand...
Bro,

Attacking Israel is one thing since Israel attacked Iran - plus regardless what people may think here, the Europeans are largely fed up of Israel because BiBi has snubbed many EU leaders when they have pushed for calm in Gaza.

But... Attacking a BRITISH base (unprovoked) will trigger Article 5. So lets be realistic and not make bravado comments like this. It makes people look immature and detached from reality.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 177 (members: 14, guests: 163)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top