Hack-Hook
INT'L MOD
for whom .,Netanyahoo and his internal cheerleadersRohani, Pezeshkian and Zarif are dangerous people. I'm surprised that nobody is stopping them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
for whom .,Netanyahoo and his internal cheerleadersRohani, Pezeshkian and Zarif are dangerous people. I'm surprised that nobody is stopping them.
Get your facts straight. It was your beloved IRI that declined a common approach against PKK and PJAK aside from some face saving minor operations in the border region to appease Türkiye for a short time.Because it targets Iran and weakens Iran. Duh! They already have reached a deal with PKK, therefore this development does not really threaten them.
But I'm a very optimistic person. I'm sure it's a coincidence that the Iranian subsidiary of the PKK is asking Azerbaijani people inside Iran to join Kurdish separatists. I'm sure it's just a coincidence.
Scott Ritter recently touched on this issue. He stated that during the Gulf War, the USAF was unable to destroy any SCUD launchers. I think it is in the video below.There is barely any issue with the TELs, don't listen to IDF hasbara with their "400 TEL destroyed", we have so far seen not more than 10 TEL destruction video, and some of them are decoys without secondary explosion or TEL without missile
it's mostly Ghadr-H TEL that have been destroyed. If the missile bases in the west are unlocked and moved to a safe place, Iran can launch more waves in a short period of time, because those western bases were inaccessible during the war, with the ceasefire Iran can unlock them
The issue is that because the airspace is not protected, Iran has to fire short salvos and quickly return the TELs underground otherwise they could be targeted
In short, loss of airspace forced Iran to launch smaller and quicker waves instead of the 100-200 missiles we saw during TP1/2 and start of TP3. Iran produces TELs like bread, they are cheap and easy to produce
A great move would be to move K/K-4 close to the Pakistan border so that Israel cannot reach them, K/K-4 can reach Israel no matter from where it is launched in Iran
So far Israel had no answer to this beside "retaliating" on civilian areas and terrorize people, especially at the end of the war
The air raids are too costly for them and distance to Iran is far. Our missiles will reach Israel faster during the nights than their bombers reaching us.
Israel is very small and this time there will be no ceasefire. USA has depleted 20% of their Thaad missiles in just 12 days wars.
They can't carry the burden of 1 month fighting, it already costed them between 6 to 20 billion USD (indirect + direct costs)
Scott Ritter recently touched on this issue. He stated that during the Gulf War, the USAF was unable to destroy any SCUD launchers. I think it is in the video below.
Scott Ritter recently touched on this issue. He stated that during the Gulf War, the USAF was unable to destroy any SCUD launchers. I think it is in the video below.
1- negotiation tableIf I bought all the necessary components to a rifle, but NOT assembled, would you say that I do not have a rifle? You do not have to answer that rhetorical question. %99.999 of people would say :'Yes, you do have a rifle'.
So let us take these components:
- There are no civilian/commercial applications for greater than %20 enriched U-235
- The refinement facility is deep underground.
No nuclear weapons program at all...
Iran is bigger, has a larger population, has ties with all its neighbours, can be supplied with essential goods and won the hearts of the world population.I get your point about costs and range, but I don’t think Israel was so naive that their entire war plan was just wait for regime change or a U.S. invasion. War costs both sides, and Israel likely calculates that Iran’s losses, infrastructure damage, and economic pain would be far worse in a sustained exchange.
For any Iranian that doesn't want Iran to be invaded by the US.for whom .,Netanyahoo and his internal cheerleaders
Get your facts straight. It was your beloved IRI that declined a common approach against PKK and PJAK aside from some face saving minor operations in the border region to appease Türkiye for a short time.
Again, the masterminds behind IRI thought that saving PKK on their own territory could be an advantage in their relationship with Türkiye in the future using terrorism as a bargaining chip. IRI bases are literally neighbouring PKK camps in Northern Iraq - do you really think that Turks aren't aware of this?
Yet, Pakistanis here are wondering why nobody in the Arab and Turkish world is showing solidarity. This is nothing but the immediate outcome of the Iranian foreign policy.
FYI, a deal between PKK and Türkiye hasn't been struck yet. The fight continues, albeit on a very low intensity.
Nobody has asked for your solidarity. Damn, you're a narcissist lol Turkey is a NATO member, the only people that think Turkey is not in bed with Israel are mainly some Pakistani people on here who think that some day the Muslims will form an axis against the US and Israel lol. Iranians know quite well that Turkey and Israel have deep strategic ties and it's not going to change any time soon.
The AN/TPY-2 radar stationed at Kurecik in Turkey has been specifically located by the US to be used as early-warning and to track Iran's ballistic missiles before it reaches Israel. I'm not blaming Turkey for her ties with the US, I'm just stating facts about why Iranians do not believe in Turkey's neutrality.
Interesting