Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

AI influenced work it seems, even I could create the similar content

not my cup of tea, I realized it later
I also told u, but U laughed at my comment.

Before he used to say greater Israel project isn't really the goal, that it's just there to keep extremists happy and that it's evident by the fact that in all these decades they could barely take these small amounts of land.

But now he is saying that Greater Israel project is real, Pax Judea.

I have also heard some other contradictions from him from recent videos compared to the ones couple years ago
 


The nature of drone activity should change now to focus on strictly OFFENSIVE CAPACITY of the adversary. Primarily the planes in their hangers... support facilities, ports and docks.
It is futile to get shots for optics alone... for saturation, yes, accompany whatever necessary but to stop aggression against the people of Iran the offensive capabilities must be degraded to the point they become essentially neutered.
Remember the high end planes of zion are maintenance heavy... find rhe Achilles heel.
 
Maybe true. How about highlighting the planes that have taken off from Bahrain that have attacked civilian and residential targets in Iran? Does that not matter? I find the duplicity incredible.
You allow your land to be used to attack Iran then are up in arms when the action is returned? Stop firing and you wont get fired at.
There are videos of HIMARS being employed from Bahraini desert. There are photos of expended canisters lying about in the desert.
 
@Haz
Suggest you post respectfully or you will have to be removed from the conversation bro
Apologies, I'll do my best.

But it would be a good thing to remind everyone here that sectarian propaganda that minimized the deaths and suffering of hundreds of thousands of Syrians is also disrespectful and insulting. I see alot of it here and it goes completely unchecked, and even encouraged by some.
 
Yankees long time lacks in point defence AA systems for low, small flying drones paid the price, they didn't learned from Rus-Ukrainian war, a few stingers on vehicle is simply not enough, you'll need laser, microwave and 48/96 salvo mini AA missiles working togerther for such scenario.
 
Apologies, I'll do my best.

But it would be a good thing to remind everyone here that sectarian propaganda that minimized the deaths and suffering of hundreds of thousands of Syrians is also disrespectful and insulting. I see alot of it here and it goes completely unchecked, and even encouraged by some.
Report the offensive posts and they will be dealt with
 
  • Like
Reactions: Haz
Warships from the UK, France, Italy and Spain are heading to Cyprus. Some have already arrived.

I suspect other European countries are going to follow suite.

That'll be immense firepower and anti-missile systems being pointed towards Iran. Distance from Cyprus and Tabriz is only 1,200 km.

If Turkiye triggers Article 5 (which I suspect Turkiye will), more NATO firepower will arrive at Iran's doorstep.

Biggest threat will be US and UK nuclear submarines in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz armed with hundreds of cruise missiles. It'll be interesting to see what strategy Iran has adapted for this particular threat.
Türkiye is not going to get in a conflict/war with Iran.

What reason would Türkiye involve herself in this?

The UK base in Cyprus has nothing to do with Türkiye. Türkiye has its own issues with Greek occupied Cyprus.
 
Hi,

What I really don't understand is---where is the strategy---where are the tactics---where is the preparedness in all this from Iran.

Where are the defensive weapons---? The fire in the heart---the zeal to fight---the openness to lay down your life for your belief and your motherland is all good---.

But in the situation---this combat does not look like it has been planned a competent general---.

Or---has the incompetence reached the highest office of the defence forces of the nation---.

There is one thing that is universally true for all nations---when the managers become yes men in fear of their position----when a disagreement may get their loped off---when the zeal overcomes reasoning and experience---that is the time to be extremely wary---.

I come back to Mushahid Hussein's comments about his security concern to Larijni short time ago about the Imam's safety and Larijani casually rebuffing it---.

And then Imam's whole family is martyred in one go---that was a major major security lapse by allowing all of them to be together at one location---the web of deception is far deeper than what it shows---.
 
Last edited:
Simplicius has another good article up on ASBMs, though this is one of his paywalled ones (might be able to redeem a free article, I'm a subscriber but IIRC if anyone isn't then you get like a free article to redeem every so often across substacks) . In general, very unlikely that any carrier could be hit with the missiles Iran does have at its disposal, given the difficulties of maintaining a line to the target without being interdicted yourself, or the carrier group simply repositions because satellite targeting is next to impossible.

Would require a carrier to actually enter the Strait of Hormuz and get within 300/150km of shore. Or just lob lots of drones in the general direction of a strike group and try and saturate PD - won't sink a carrier, but hit some planes on the top, or mess up the bridge, etc.

Hypothetically, I guess if one were to obtain a missile similar to Oreshnik, you could repurpose that kind of delivery vehicle to function as an area deterrent for a carrier group, as the individual submunitions are allegedly guided. But to what degree is unclear, and you must also acknowledge the difficulties of having something basically encased in plasma until the strike itself and having complicated guidance technologies within the submunitions.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top