Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We will do that once we are done with talibans .desperatley waiting for the brave sons of noor jahan to do a preemptive strike inside india
Does Iran have any satellite kill rocket? If yes, they should take out some US satellites.
Maybe instead of a kinetic kill an emp warhead can disable some satellites. Emp detonation can be directed to incoming satellites detonating above atmosphere. Leo satellites especially if not shielded enough can have some malfunction.They most likely can, if they try. But only in a kinetic way, a direct hit of warhead to satellite. Though that can lead to an uncontrolled Kessler effect, taking out all other satellites in that orbit over time. Maybe even trapping humanity on Earth if enough debree starts orbiting the Earth.
A few strategists stated though, in the past, that if Iran feels a nuclear threat, it can always threaten the West with starting A Kessler Effect, it will be worse than a 1,000 nukes for the modern civilization. The downside is, that everyone will be fu**ed collectively if that happens.
Modern ASAT weapons use non kinetic means , like chasing satellites and frying their electronics from a distance, or using Earth based lasers, so they decay naturally into Earth's atmosphere. That tech is not available to Iran though.
" Worse than 1000 nukes " ...... very imaginative explanation of Kessler syndrome.They most likely can, if they try. But only in a kinetic way, a direct hit of warhead to satellite. Though that can lead to an uncontrolled Kessler effect, taking out all other satellites in that orbit over time. Maybe even trapping humanity on Earth if enough debree starts orbiting the Earth.
A few strategists stated though, in the past, that if Iran feels a nuclear threat, it can always threaten the West with starting A Kessler Effect, it will be worse than a 1,000 nukes for the modern civilization. The downside is, that everyone will be fu**ed collectively if that happens.
Modern ASAT weapons use non kinetic means , like chasing satellites and frying their electronics from a distance, or using Earth based lasers, so they decay naturally into Earth's atmosphere. That tech is not available to Iran though.
Or just delete. Probably need vpnWhen you login, accept the terms and conditions and you will be able to view all external links
Those ships have very sensistve hull mounted sonars and can easily detect and avoid any mines. They also have an array of guns and helicopter cover that can deal with any usv and fast boat threat before it gets close enough. Drones are a bit tricky to deal with without expending lots of missiles but with enough emirates has shown how effective cuas can be in filtering through most of the threats and paired with CIWS and Gun based AD they wont be a major threat. Besides even if a drone or two hits they wont do any damage of note. The ballistic and cruise missile threat is the easiest to counter as those are threats which require dedicated missiles and for those the sm-2/3/6s will be more than capable of handling.
Iran has thousands of anti ship threats but it cannot launch them at once the numbers i provided are based on what i believe iran can continue to throw out despite prowling hostile airforces bombarding their sites. Running the strait without softening up irans capability further is not advisable and without a solid plan is suicide but it is inherently possible for them to run the Strait with enough planning to get to kharg island