Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Why attack when eventually it will be bought out? Taiwan is not going anywhere. China would be foolish to invite or start a war in that region especially now. First wait till a civil war breaks out in the USA.
Their image has taken a huge hit. The entire world knows now that America is the undisputed king. As much as i hate to admit it, its the reality. An attacka dn force induction of taiwan will bring balance to world
 
Their image has taken a huge hit. The entire world knows now that America is the undisputed king. As much as i hate to admit it, its the reality. An attacka dn force induction of taiwan will bring balance to world
The USA is very broken domestically. A latest survey showed that even 50 to 60% Canadians are living paycheck to paycheck.

China should stay avoid starting a war by attacking Taiwan. Much much better to wait and make lots of money.
 
This major general should accept an overwhelming majority in the US army consists of war criminals. Killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people in Iraq on just the suspicion of WMDs was a war crime.

Killing hundreds of thousands innocent civilians in Japan in retaliation of an attack on pearl harbor was a war crime too.

Bombing an elementary school on the first day of a war where you have all the time to identify and assess the targets was a war crime.

They know it very well ... and have been trained for it:

When questioned on killing of children by Israel, Former Israeli President Avarham Burg said: "We see an opportunity, we act on it, morality is not our concern. Others consider morality and in those cases we use it as a weakness, against them."

This is what anyone who stands against zionists and their allies are dealing with. One would say that is a subhuman way and a worthless life to live, no matter what zionists gain form it, but that's what they do regardless, for a temporary high in their worthless lives.
 
I shared a meme on the previous war between Israel-Iran which encapsulates majority of Syria's sentiment right now:
View attachment 188031
We'll happily just sit on the sideline and watch both sides go at it, the vast majority are not very fond of either side.

Most importantly, the entire population is deeply against our involvement for any reason, and the government knows this well, they sense the strong opposition against joining any conflict at the moment, theres no appetite for anymore violence from any segment of the population.

This is why despite the heavy Zio propaganda and constant US pressure pushing for us to go into Lebanon and pacify Hezbollah, knowing full well how much we hate them at the moment and how it can easily be justified by the government, Sharaa still rejected this effort and is doing his best to remain out of it:
Sit down man, Sharaa is literally a Zio puppet.
 
Iran has not responded like in a real war. Its targetting of the racist entity is haphhazard and light yet it is damaging the GCC a lot more.

Might be because the GCC had radars that gave Israel tracking information to shoot down the missiles fired at them?

Hmm... No no, Iran is shia and hates the GCC and is firing at them at the behest of Israel. Israel Iran bhai bhai

1774420243523.png
 



Saudi source: Saudi Arabia does not want to prolong the war with Iran

🔹 An official Saudi source told Al Arabiya: "The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has previously denied the claims that the country's leadership wants to prolong the war with Iran ."

@TasnimNews


Of course they would say that, that's their strategy. Maintain plausible deniability.

Didn't they say they are not involved in the war, yet gave their airbases and airspace?
 
Iran suspects that Trump's proposal for negotiations to end the war is a new deception ploy. Iranian officials told countries attempting to mediate between Iran and the US that they have already been misled twice by President Trump and that they "do not want to be deceived again" during the negotiations, according to a source with direct knowledge of the discussions
@BarakRavid

 
I address the difference between then and now in my original statement. The soldier of today is a highly trained, specialized soldier who costs hundreds of thousands to train and field. Can't be replicated by a fresh recruit. Today's weapon systems are complex tools, so preserving a single soldier is a necessity; a simple drone wiping out a unit is a sunk cost. As an example, if you lose the operator, you lose the capability entirely. Preservation isn't about fear; it's about maintaining a functional military advantage that cannot be mass-produced.

You should also read the statement after I mentioned World War I & II, and it's good practice to understand the statement in its totality.



The losses have to be justified, since WWI- and WWII-style combat was a necessity, but fighting ragtag mountain militants isn't.

Another factor to consider is that the West softens its target through sanctions and then bombs the enemy state because the West has a population replacement rate below 2.1, so protection isn't just a choice but a long-term strategy.

Most important thing for Americans able to takes losses/pain is not only about losses of troops and equipment. The US is pretty much the only country when it fights the enemy, the enemy takes losses of troops and their own infrastructure, civilians, industry etc while the US only has to take troops/equipment losses. The US never had to worry about their own country, cities, infrastructure, civilians and industry to be affected. This is the single biggest advantage the US has which is why they can start war after war and their people not strongly opposing it.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top