Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

does israel have the capability right now to attack iran on its own?? That's the only way it can resume if the americans are not really interested....

not sure but the weekend is coming up, lets see if the zionists want to resume war.
it would be deadly and economy worldwide will shit itself into oblivion
 
does israel have the capability right now to attack iran on its own?? That's the only way it can resume if the americans are not really interested....

not sure but the weekend is coming up, lets see if the zionists want to resume war.
it would be deadly and economy worldwide will shit itself into oblivion
No, itsnotreal is nothing without the USA. It is USA aircraft carrier, forward military base all in one.

Israel will do what America wants it to do.
 
does israel have the capability right now to attack iran on its own?? That's the only way it can resume if the americans are not really interested....

not sure but the weekend is coming up, lets see if the zionists want to resume war.
it would be deadly and economy worldwide will shit itself into oblivion
IAF has the capability it had last year during the 12 day war. That's about it.
 
A while back I posted after I had realised that a tussle and a scuffle is on the cards between the Zionists in control of America, and the Anglo-Saxons who actually built America into what it is today and who increasingly want to control it again.

All of this, the Iran war, could be a ploy by the Anglo-Saxons to trick the Zionists to scramble to assert overt control and thus exposing their positions so the Anglo-Saxons could flank them, politically that is, and wrestle control of America back from the Zionists.

There clearly are battle lines being drawn between them. With rhetoric against each other increasing both in volume and intensity.

I had also made the claim that Tucker Carlson would become the defacto spokesperson of the White Anglo-Saxons/Protestants as well as the Catholics. But beware, neither the Anglo-Saxons nor the Zionists are well wishers of the broader, coloured world. The both sides want to dominate the planet. The difference is that the zionists do not have any tact for going about it and are uncivilized violent racist evil bloodthirsty barbarians , but the Anglo-Saxons are more tactful and only resort to violence when they deem in necessary.

All of this is my guess because what is happening does not make sense to me.
Too late now, that ship has long sailed for greener pastures in Asia. Zionists have the Anglo-Saxon western world completely co-opted or to put it in colloquial terms more comprehendible to the Anglo-Saxon masses, by the balls. They won't let go until total destruction of the Anglo-Saxon world or the new Rome as Zionists refer to them derogatively, to be avenged for more than two millennia of humiliation, domination and subjugation.
 
Last edited:
I never said the money was put to good use...I'm just saying don't expect the US to fight like Russia where they probably lose more men in a week in Ukraine than we did in the 8 months in Iraq it took to find/capture Saddam.
But russia is losing men today to strengthen its empire and sphere of influence in the future, meanwhile, US is afraid to lose soldiers to save its empire, so it will almost certainly lose it empire in the future(this is not my wish, its the natural karma for the US govt and its illiterate, dumb president).
War is a means to an end, its not the end result
 
Too late now, that ship has long sailed for greener pastures in Asia. Zionists have the Anglo-Saxon western world completely co-opted or to put it in colloquial terms more comprehendible to the Anglo-Saxon masses, by the balls. They won't let go until total destruction of the Anglo-Saxon world or the new Rome as Zionists refer to them derogatively, to be avenged for more than two millennia of humiliation, domination and subjugation.
Two election cycles, that is all it takes for any lobby to become the hunted instead of the hunters.

You underestimate the Anglo-Saxons. They after all are distant cousins of the Junkers.
 
But russia is losing men today to strengthen its empire

yeah well the population of Russia is less now than it was 30 years ago so they certainly are not expanding. They have missed out on being a player in the latest technological innovations. Now they have become a land of spectators in the stands instead of being a team on the field.
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Today's updates:
Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei declared on April 30 that Iran will retain control over shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and maintain its nuclear and missile capabilities, which supports ISW-CTP’s assessment that the Iranian regime is unlikely to make meaningful concessions in its next proposal to the United States.[1] Mojtaba published a written statement on April 30 in which he stated that Iran will implement a “new management” in the strait—likely in reference to Iran’s collection of tolls from vessels that transit the strait—as a means to “secure” the Persian Gulf and prevent “hostile” interference in the region.[2] Mojtaba also underscored that Iran will defend its nuclear, missile, and advanced technological capabilities as resolutely as it defends its territorial borders.[3] A senior Iranian official speaking to the Washington Post on April 30 similarly asserted that Iran’s security establishment rejects compromise on key matters, such as Iran’s ability to enrich uranium.[4] Mojtaba’s statement and the Washington Post report are consistent with ISW-CTP’s assessment that IRGC Commander Major General Ahmad Vahidi, who appears to be dominating regime decision-making, is unwilling to make concessions regarding Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz or nuclear program.[5] Vahidi reportedly maintains near-exclusive access to Mojtaba and serves as a gatekeeper who conveys Mojtaba’s approval of decisions.[6] Pakistani mediators told Western media that Iran is expected to send them a revised proposal on May 1.[7]

Based on this, it appears the Blockade and standoff will continue for some more time. Iran is probably not under sufficient economic stress where it has to make concessions.
 
IAF has the capability it had last year during the 12 day war. That's about it.
And it still needs a continuous air bridge of tankers and ISR platforms from the US and other countries to keep it going. Then everyone from French Rafales deployed at Al Darfa to British Typhoons and USAF fighters to shoot down Irani drones and THAAD/SM-6 to take out BMs
 
Based on this, it appears the Blockade and standoff will continue for some more time. Iran is probably not under sufficient economic stress where it has to make concessions.
I was talking to somebody who understands oil pretty well on a professional level. He told me that Iran can store up to 150 million barrels of oil in different ways.

Iran produces nearly 4 million barrels of oil per day, of which about 2.2 million barrels used to be consumed domestically. We export about 1.8 million barrels per day, which has probably increased since February 29th because we're no longer exporting petrochemical products in large scale.

So, if we assume that Iran has 2 million barrels of excess oil to export, and about 20%-25% of this gets exported anyway, either by passing through the blockade as many tankers have or via ground routes, Iran's storage capacity will be full after at most 100 days, of which only 20 days have passed. Also, that's plenty of time to adjust oil production safely with minimal loss.

That aside, the nature of Iran's oil is different from the US shale oil as it requires less artificial pressure to be extracted. So, even if Iran has to shut down some oil wells after some time, the damage will be much less extreme than the US shale oil. As I understood, Iran's conventional oil has high permeability and strong natural pressure which make it much easier to shut down an oil well without a meaningful recovery time.

So, this whole blockade can go for at least 3 months before it causes any sort of real damage to our oil industry. The question is, does the US have 3 months before oil prices jump to $150 bbl? I think the war has to resume by late-May or early-June, if not earlier.
 
I was talking to somebody who understands oil pretty well on a professional level. He told me that Iran can store up to 150 million barrels of oil in different ways.

Iran produces nearly 4 million barrels of oil per day, of which about 2.2 million barrels used to be consumed domestically. We export about 1.8 million barrels per day, which has probably increased since February 29th because we're no longer exporting petrochemical products in large scale.

So, if we assume that Iran has 2 million barrels of excess oil to export, and about 20%-25% of this gets exported anyway, either by passing through the blockade as many tankers have or via ground routes, Iran's storage capacity will be full after at most 100 days, of which only 20 days have passed. Also, that's plenty of time to adjust oil production safely with minimal loss.

That aside, the nature of Iran's oil is different from the US shale oil as it requires less artificial pressure to be extracted. So, even if Iran has to shut down some oil wells after some time, the damage will be much less extreme than the US shale oil. As I understood, Iran's conventional oil has high permeability and strong natural pressure which make it much easier to shut down an oil well without a meaningful recovery time.

So, this whole blockade can go for at least 3 months before it causes any sort of real damage to our oil industry. The question is, does the US have 3 months before oil prices jump to $150 bbl? I think the war has to resume by late-May or early-June, if not earlier.
The blockade can go on for quite some time, as you said, before Iran is under pressure. Even then, I think, oil prices are unlikely to go to $150 as there seems to be price elasticity at $100+. Consumption will go down as many people can no longer afford to buy at that price. Airlines are reducing or eliminating lower revenue flights. People will drive less or use other modes of transport. WTI price fell from $109 to $105 from yesterday to today!
 
No, I'm sorry but that's just cope. You had one military that was pounding our soldiers and our top command was literally on the hot line begging Americans to stop. And our response was to close the borders - if you find that an acceptable response then I don't know what to say.

And no, they didn't need to repeat again, they humiliated us enough and continued to do so by using our OWN bases against our OWN citizens every single day, whilst we sat down and watched. This is utterly pathetic and shameful past of our nation. If you want to know what an appropriate response is, look next door at Iranians. That's what you call having self respect.

My point is simple, we're no match against major world countries and we need to humble ourself and accept the bitter reality, whilst at the same time work hard to improve the state of our nation.
Bilkul……our military is from the last century. And China has no modern warfare experience and none of their weapons/ systems have been tested against real powers out there.

Just watched that Mearsheimer/ Col. Davis podcast and both admitted that Irans fucked the US up big time and trump sahb is just refusing to accept defeat and move on.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The blockade can go on for quite some time, as you said, before Iran is under pressure. Even then, I think, oil prices are unlikely to go to $150 as there seems to be price elasticity at $100+. Consumption will go down as many people can no longer afford to buy at that price. Airlines are reducing or eliminating lower revenue flights. People will drive less or use other modes of transport. WTI price fell from $109 to $105 from yesterday to today!
Brent crude price reached $124 bbl less than 48 hours ago, it is now back to $114 again, but it's rising slowly again and may set a new high soon. Brent crude price is the one used internationally as the benchmark for oil price. Otherwise, there are already countries selling their oil well above that price. Arab's Extra Light is already traded at $138 bbl, for example.

I think most countries have already reduced their consumption, as much as they could. Some countries are already using their strategic reserves. Most countries will run out of their strategic reserves after 6 months. Then things will get very interesting. Even $200 bbl for some high quality crude oil is not out of the question if that happens.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top