Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[hasn2009]

 

[Bharatah]

an attack is imminent

12 days ago, Reuters said that in "24 h iran would be hit by the usa" , that was closes to happen, all the media repeated this, 10 days passed and nothing. All of this is part of a HYBRID WARFARE strategy aimed at weakening the adversary in the eyes of other nations, etc.

 

[PK781]

NOTHING has happened yet.......i'm more inclined to start believing my friend that there will be no attack, the US is just posturing to scare the Arabs to comply to its own demands.......

If they had wanted to attack, would've happened by now i think ?

 

[hasn2009]

Though there is a difference, Houthis didn't have anything to loose, but Iran does. Iran can loose 100s of billions of $ incase of war

 

[mangekyo]

None of us here as any influence over Iranian decision making.

My understanding here is that there are mainly 3 type of people here.

A: Iran can’t beat the US so it should go down in «style»
B: Iran has the military capabilities to defeat the US.
C: Iran’s survival should be the priority and they should change foreign policy.

 

[shapurzolaktaf]

Though there is a difference, Houthis didn't have anything to loose, but Iran does. Iran can loose 100s of billions of $ incase of war

Iran has nothing to lose because its existence will be in danger, so 100 billion usd is nothing in this case.

 

[hasn2009]

12 days ago, Reuters said that in "24 h iran would be hit by the usa" , that was closes to happen, all the media repeated this, 10 days passed and nothing. All of this is part of a HYBRID WARFARE strategy aimed at weakening the adversary in the eyes of other nations, etc.

Sensation/drama sells, these media/news channel will starve to bankruptcy if there are no conflicts/wars and there is only peace everywhere

 

[mangekyo]

You'd have to laugh a lot to fall for fake news of this level. Nobody reveals military war strategies on Twitter; even a dolphin is intelligent enough to understand that.

These US statements are media bravado, which comes along with the kidnapping of Maduro (which was done by corrupt people inside Venezuela and not by Delta Force) to simulate a greater power than actually exists, which is classic in hybrid warfare. Maduro and Assad left through AGREEMENTS; Iran only falls through an AGREEMENT/SURRENDER, otherwise it won't fall. It's just that after AGREEMENTS, the US simulates a miraculous military action to deceive people at home and in rival countries.

Along with this, they produce statements like: Turkey is preparing to receive millions of refugees in Iran, Russia will receive Ayatollah Khamenei (this fake news is old and was first said in 2009), all of this is part of hybrid warfare strategies.

NOTE: Notice that in Zionist media, the US/Israel have no dead soldiers, no dead spies, wage thousands of wars but spend no money on them, kill no civilians, and have no logistical problems (which are extremely complicated in war), while their adversaries are portrayed as constantly plagued by problems...

You’re wrong. Prior to bombing fordow, they did announce they would drop MOPs from B2s on Fordow. They did exactly that.

 

[mangekyo]

NOTHING has happened yet.......i'm more inclined to start believing my friend that there will be no attack, the US is just posturing to scare the Arabs to comply to its own demands.......

If they had wanted to attack, would've happened by now i think ?

Its western bureaucracy. They will attack, it just takes time.

 

[Meengla]

12 days ago, Reuters said that in "24 h iran would be hit by the usa" , that was closes to happen, all the media repeated this, 10 days passed and nothing. All of this is part of a HYBRID WARFARE strategy aimed at weakening the adversary in the eyes of other nations, etc.

What is 'weakening' going to achieve and in front of what 'other nations'? There is a lot of effort being put into mobilizing around Iran and I bet they are going to stay there until some major 'concession' is extracted from Iran and only then they will retreat. It is expensive to mobilize such resources--too expensive just for a 'show'.

After the Assad govt fell--pardon, when 'freedom' came to Syria-- Netanyahu said there is a 'unique opportunity' to fix his 'Iran problem'. And he has a guy in the White House who, even in the 'peace time' in his first term, gifted away Israel goodies which no American President before him in 5 decades had done. Why will Netanyahu not take advantage of Iran's greatly reduced deterrence lost from Gaza/Lebanon/Syria with 'his man' in the White House??

 

[Bharatah]

None of us here as any influence over Iranian decision making.

My understanding here is that there are mainly 3 type of people here.

A: Iran can’t beat the US so it should go down in «style»
B: Iran has the military capabilities to defeat the US.
C: Iran’s survival should be the priority and they should change foreign policy.

No , the true option is Letter D:

D: Iran has the military capabilities to defend himself the US/Israel like Russia does with Otan

NOTE: There is no open War coming...The US/Israeli action are a hybrid warfare and media operation, which may include at some point a media attack in the style of a Maduro kidnapping, but nothing more than that.

 

[PakAl]

for past 14 years , I repeated "We should have nukes"

most my countrymen just mocked me and banned me from forums ...

I still repeat it : " we should have nukes "

I still have hunch Iran does possess the nukes in order to defend themselves, or else why insist on nuclear enrichment and face decades of extreme sanctions which cost Iran 100s of billions, they could have just imported nuclear energy or went renewal.

 

[Yasser76]

Whatever happens next, considering the relative weakness Iran has with regards to the US military (well, any country has against the US military), I can but only admire the courage and conviction of the Iranians. Not debating who is right or wrong, but one thing you can never say is that they bowed their heads.

 

[BigMela2onin]

I still have hunch Iran does possess the nukes in order to defend themselves, or else why insist on nuclear enrichment and face decades of extreme sanctions which cost Iran 100s of billions, they could have just imported nuclear energy or went renewal.

Because it has stupid leaders

 

[BigMela2onin]

Though there is a difference, Houthis didn't have anything to loose, but Iran does. Iran can loose 100s of billions of $ incase of war

There is not much to lose at this point. They intend to end all Iranian energy exports.