Hamartia Antidote
Elite Member
It depends upon what you mean by "feasible".
If by feasible you mean having a ground assault and then sticking soldiers on every corner of the country to keep people in line then yes of course it is not feasible.
Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds
- Thread starter Khorasan Black Flags
- Start date
It depends upon what you mean by "feasible".
If by feasible you mean having a ground assault and then sticking soldiers on every corner of the country to keep people in line then yes of course it is not feasible.
Mehdipersian
Trusted Member
Iran has never had as much military power in its history as it does now. Saying that Iran has weakened is a morale booster for Trump to enter the quagmire of war with Iran.
The only thing that might be detrimental to Iran is the absence of the Baath government in Syria, which was also a problem for Iran for years not a helper.
Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis are still there and are rebuilding their power.Their popularity, members, and thinking are thousands of times greater than before the war.
mythbuster
Trusted Member
I hope these armchair Clausewitz and Rommel won't push Iran from event horizon into the black hole.
Khansaheeb
Elite Member
It's getting serious, Iranians better put rations in their bunkers.
kastor ville
Registered Member
Listen...stop. it's better not to boast about anything... Iran is weak right now. The US will have air supremacy. Let's not delude ourselves. With that said, we can still do some serious damage to them.
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
SiliconBit (silicon0000)
Trusted Member
A full-scale U.S.–Iran war coming soon. Israel wants it to happen at any cost, and now it will happen. Iran should get ready; it is running out of time. BB got trump with his ***** and Trump has to follow Israel & has no other option left now.
Khorasan Black Flags
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #61,600
Rumor Watch — Another Disgraceful Fabrication by i$rahel International (Iran international) TV Channel:
In their latest shameless fabrication, anti-Iran propaganda outlets circulated a photo claiming that a 28-year-old woman named “Fatemeh Alizadeh,” from Talesh, was killed by security forces in Mashhad on January 8 while pregnant.
Fact-checking has exposed this disgraceful lie: the image actually belongs to “Rabi Ahmed,” an Iraqi model and blogger — proving once again how these serial fabricators recklessly invent stories and spread blatant falsehoods without the slightest regard for truth.
These same rumor-mongers have previously stooped to similar deceptions, falsely presenting unrelated people as victims of unrest — including an Israeli man, the son of Naftali Bennett (who is alive), an Israeli girl who is also alive, and Jenna Ortega, an American actress who has never even set foot in Iran.
Death to occupied palestine
In their latest shameless fabrication, anti-Iran propaganda outlets circulated a photo claiming that a 28-year-old woman named “Fatemeh Alizadeh,” from Talesh, was killed by security forces in Mashhad on January 8 while pregnant. Fact-checking has exposed this disgraceful lie: the image actually belongs to “Rabi Ahmed,” an Iraqi model and blogger — proving once again how these serial fabricators recklessly invent stories and spread blatant falsehoods without the slightest regard for truth. These same rumor-mongers have previously stooped to similar deceptions, falsely presenting unrelated people as victims of unrest — including an Israeli man, the son of Naftali Bennett (who is alive), an Israeli girl who is also alive, and Jenna Ortega, an American actress who has never even set foot in Iran.Death to occupied palestine
Hassan Al-Somal
Elite Member
“They want to make a deal, as they should want to make a deal,” Trump said last week. “They know the consequences if they don’t. If they don’t make a deal, the consequences are very steep. So we’ll see what happens.”
Trump keeps talking about a deal when he is not offering anything to the Iranians except saying he wont attack them if they accept his demands. So who is being fooled here?
"
️BREAKINGAmerican proposal rejected by Iran:
The Americans proposed that Iran completely cease its enrichment activities for 3 to 5 years, then proceed with enrichment at only 1.5%
Iran would have to hand over 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%
The United States would not lift sanctions and would only refrain from attacking Iran"
Without offering anything tangible to the Iranians, what is the point of this "deal"? Does Trump think Iranians would just capitulate with the mere mention of being attacked? Seriously, the so-called talks are meaningless if one of the sides is not offering anything.
Last edited:
PK781
Trusted Member
according to few, its just a pressure tactic of the americans. Even the epstein files are revealed so the zions cannot blackmail trump anymore as much as they think they can. Satanyahu himself is in trouble in his own land which means he just wants a get out of jail card everytime.....but war is expensive these days.
the world and its fragile economy seriously cannot afford any Big Wars at this time, if war happens, it may trigger alot of regional wars/conflicts and then nobody can stop the wars and shit that hits the fan
BigMela2onin
Trusted Member
War is a preferable outcome to sanctions remaining on at this point. It will at least give Iran a chance to extract a high enough cost to change US thinking. No point in engaging in negotiations if sanctions removal is not being offered.
Axios, citing an Iranian journalist: Wytkoff's emails included a proposal that Iran halt enrichment for a period of 3-5 years, with the possibility that it might then be able to enrich at a very low level.
In reality, I am convinced that the Turkish Foreign Minister is likely the only individual who speaks the truth. Both parties, the US and Iranians, are interested in spreading their narrative of the negotiations.
Personally,
I don't believe the US is negotiating in good faith.
I don't believe the story of regime change.
I believe the US has already made the decision to attack Iran and I believe their goal is the physical destruction of the Iranian state and obliteration of the Iranian nation which is why they 'postponed' the initial attack to bring in more equipment.
However, I also believe that the Iranians are going to "suprise" the US/West this time. I don't believe Iranians are going to repeat the same mistake.
“They want to make a deal, as they should want to make a deal,” Trump said last week. “They know the consequences if they don’t. If they don’t make a deal, the consequences are very steep. So we’ll see what happens.”
Trump keeps talking about a deal when he is not offering anything to the Iranians except saying he wont attack them if they accept his demands. So who is being fooled here?
"
American proposal rejected by Iran:
The Americans proposed that Iran completely cease its enrichment activities for 3 to 5 years, then proceed with enrichment at only 1.5%
Iran would have to hand over 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%
The United States would not lift sanctions and would only refrain from attacking Iran"
Without offering anything tangible to the Iranians, what is the point of this "deal"? Does Trump think Iranians would just capitulate with the mere mention of being attacked? Seriously, the so-called talks are meaningless if one of the sides is not offering anything.
Pffffff..... that's what they call à deal ? F... off
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
-
Punjab faces greater threat from other provinces than 'neighbouring countries': CM Maryam (16 Viewers)
- Latest: Protagoras
-
-
-
-
Country Watch Latest
Latest Posts
-
USS Lincoln ‘Hit’ By Iran’s ‘Rustsheed’ Missile? Rusty Warship Fuels A Chilling New Claim (22 Viewers)- Latest: Beijingwalker
-
Punjab faces greater threat from other provinces than 'neighbouring countries': CM Maryam (16 Viewers)
- Latest: Protagoras
-
-
-
