Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

I can also say you are biased, should I also discard your opinion because all you saw has to be dragged through the Iranian lens?

Knowledge is knowledge; it can't be biased. The interpretation, however, can be. He was talking about my knowledge on the subject not my interpretation of it.
I am biased and wish that Iran kick your crusader troops permanently.

That is simply not true there are many epistemic standards but that is wider discussion.
 
This makes sense to you? Sending only one missile to Turkey that does nothing but force NATO to join the war against Iran?

Their foreign minister and state media is constantly pushing that Iran was the instigator and is the aggressor in this war. Many Turks who are not Zionists have woken up and criticizes the government for taking sides with Zionists.

Turkey is trying to build up popular support against Iran

Much in this conflict makes little sense
 
That was from Geo news. Usually Israelis are qoute boastful about Iron Dome. First time they are admitting things may get through.


wait for night missile strikes

if they are visibly using lower tier missiles against incoming BM, means they are confident, stocks wont go low!

OTOH, if IR fires a heavier volley, then, stocks are not running low!
 
Well i am certainly not but i am not claiming otherwise and that my knowledge is objective like him which is absurd in current circumstances, he is american first after all.
Dude, knowledge are objective........you can't "unlearn" something just because you don't agree how thing was done, you can say my interpretation of stuff or my opinion is biased, but knowledge is knowledge

On the other hand, I have yet to hear any bit of argument to counter my supposedly "biased" opinion; all you are saying is that since I am biased, I am wrong. Again, can I apply the same standard to you? You want a meaningful discussion? then discuss the point, instead of discussing whether or not I am biased.
 
USA is repeating Iraq war strategy. First gaining air superiority by destroying radars then carrying out carpet bombing

There is no need for carpet bombing. Precision strikes are far more effective.
 


So - if Saudi does attack Iran, and kicks off a war, it will "call on" Pakistan to come and "defend it". Pakistan's defence is very thin as it is as it was only enough for India, will have to send forces to defend ( even if it is for passive defence like shooting down drones, etc) Saudi. India will see a gap, and restart Sindoor again.

The Pakistan - Saudi alliance was not formalised with additional capacity by Pakistan for Saudi defence at all.

Any war between Saudi, and Iran will also weaken Saudi, making them weaker against Israel at the same time.

Lets hope the Saudi's have some common sense, and see the bigger picture and not get involved. Same applies to Qatar, UAE etc. What Iran is doing is tiny tiny pin pricks at best to mostly American bases/equipment/forces that they are hosting.

There is certainly a master plan behind all this to get the "Goyims" to fight amongst themselves, so that they become easier push-overs later on.
 
So - if Saudi does attack Iran, and kicks off a war, it will "call on" Pakistan to come and "defend it". Pakistan's defence it thin as it is as it was only enough for India, will send forces to defend ( even if it is for passive defence like shooting down drones, etc). India will see a gap, and restart Sindoor again.

Any war between Saudi, and Iran will also weaken Saudi, making them weaker against Israel at the same time.

Lets hope the Saudi's have some common sense, and see the bigger picture and not get involved.

There is certainly a master plan behind all this to get the "Goyims" to fight amongst themselves, so that they become easier push-overs later on.
Saudi Government has already said it is not interested in a war with Iran. It has reached out to Iran already.
 
Dude, knowledge are objective........you can't "unlearn" something just because you don't agree how thing was done, you can say my interpretation of stuff or my opinion is biased, but knowledge is knowledge

On the other hand, I have yet to hear any bit of argument to counter my supposedly "biased" opinion; all you are saying is that since I am biased, I am wrong. Again, can I apply the same standard to you? You want a meaningful discussion? then discuss the point, instead of discussing whether or not I am biased.

Lets back to square one, why do you think that you will win over Iran and impose your will over them which is basic necessity in order to come back in region. Do not deflect and spin with some past tense false regional associations, answer straightforwardly as much as you can how you will impose your will over Iran?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top