So you completely changed your stance. This is what I told you earlier this week:
This is what you responded with:
So the foolish one is you, you talk from both sides of your mouth! No credibility!
You completely misunderstand the difference between "weapons" and "UAVs." These are two entirely different concepts.
Given your low IQ, I can explain it more clearly. This type of UAV.
If it contains "military" components (such as military-grade electronic components, warheads, and military-grade materials), it will be subject to Chinese laws regarding arms control. We can state definitively that China will not sell weapons to Iran at this stage.
But...
If it contains no "military" components, uses only civilian-grade materials and electronic components, and does not contain a warhead, then it is a purely civilian product and is not subject to Chinese laws regarding arms control. It can be exported.
In principle, if the purchasing country converts these civilian products for military use, it also violates Chinese law. However, the market for such civilian-grade products is enormous, and the channels for their circulation in the international market are extremely complex, making legal proof almost impossible. The Chinese government does not legally permit such behavior, but in reality, it is "unable" (this is a gray area) to regulate it.
On the Russian-Ukrainian front, both sides used a large number of UAVs to attack each other. Only China has the capacity to supply these UAVs on such a scale. Officially, the Chinese government does not allow Chinese companies to sell these products to either side. In reality, both sides purchase large quantities of these UAVs or components from China.
As for warheads, China has very strict controls over the production and sale of explosives. These are highly regulated enterprises.
However, China exports fertilizers all over the world…... I guess your intelligence might not be able to understand that.
