ToddE
Trusted Member
So you believe their injured numbers but not their deaths> They don't censor the injured but they do with deaths. I think this is just wishful thinking. Of the 250-300 strikes how many actually make impacts? And of those impacts how many are in places where humans are located?
Nobody knows how many impacted and where and thats the point. They are just not showing it because they are hiding, can you guess what or is it too hard ? They do-not-want-to-be-seen-taking-non-stop-hits.
Clusters cant be intercepted, last 1-1.5 weeks, we are seeing no proper interceptions of IRGC attack waves. Even if you go by half the 0.5 million Lbs of total lobbed warhead (discounting intercepted debris for sake of argument), thats still enough to **** up an entire city which makes sense by their own admitted 4000 hospitalized injuries and thousands of damaged or ruined buildings (some minor leaked evidence). What you are arguing is that somehow only <1 % casualty is happening for hospitalized or injured population which is nonsense or extremely biased thinking.
I'm well aware that their is a censor on on videos especially on military installations, but if their was this widespread destruction we would definitely have more footage of it.
You do realize they have complete official media blackout and police arrests and fines you if you leak anything? Compared to Iran we are getting like 1% footage from Israel.
Iran literally has had the internet cut off for two weeks and we are seeing videos everyday of the bombs and aftermath.
Yet media is allowed to cover everything, leaks are not stopped. There is Zero censorship policy by IRI. Having no internet means nothing when media coverage of impact is broadcasted and it matches US/Israel claim.





