Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Mutakalim said:
If UK has been in the conflict by providing bases to American bombers to transit, then GCC are also complicit by housing American installations. In fact they are providing more support to coalition operations than majority of NATO signatories.
Click to expand...
Diego Garcia and Fairford gives the US range and staging without regional politics. UK gets to look like a reliable ally without putting boots on the ground.

Classic power projection maths.
 



They reported their wounded to be 3369 a few days ago. Now, the child-killing entity is reporting their wounded to be at least 4000. So roughly 48 hours, they wounded increased over 700.

Besides, they are using the terms "at least", meaning their wounded is way much more than 4000.

And in a ratio of 1:6 for every KIA vs WIA, that gives you at least 667 child-killing, squatting settlers killed in Iranian and Hezbollah missiles, rockets, and drones.
 
Last edited:
Eid Mubarak to all

It's appear Trump admin strategy is to wait it out until they see a decline in Iran's operations quantitatively and/or qualitatively

The $100 barrel is not good for American consumers but for establishment that doesn't care it's sustainable for 3-6 months.

Trump admin will not wrap this up anytime soon until they see tangible signs of depletion of Iran's military arsenal

Outcome just points to attempted regime change. May take on different forms when they see signs of Iran's military arsenal being depleted or local security forces/government losing control of situation on ground

This is going to go into the summer in my opinion
 
Persian Gulf said:
Trump with his latest statement trying to calm the markets and imply the war will be over soon

not going to happen
Click to expand...
So I was reading his list of demands so in simple terms he wants their complete surrender and they’re not allowed to even have a military of any kind sooooo I’m assuming Iran is going to give him the
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2835.jpeg
    IMG_2835.jpeg
    13.1 KB · Views: 2
Immortals said:
None of my posts implied I had a military background. That’s a reading comprehension issue on your end.



That doesn’t make you any more qualified to know the U.S. military’s next move, which is what we were discussing (as you just implied “your guess is as good as mine”) nor does it make you know the inner workings of detecting and intercepting an F-35.

You routinely bring points into conversation that do not address the bottom line. Like this current off topic diversion you are leading us on.

If you thought my words were directed to you then that again goes back to your reading comprehension. You are not the only American on this forum. There are quite a few that like to pop in and troll(and not just Americans).
Click to expand...
Cowboys gonna cowboy
 
Falcon29 said:
Eid Mubarak to all

It's appear Trump admin strategy is to wait it out until they see a decline in Iran's operations quantitatively and/or qualitatively

The $100 barrel is not good for American consumers but for establishment that doesn't care it's sustainable for 3-6 months.

Trump admin will not wrap this up anytime soon until they see tangible signs of depletion of Iran's military arsenal

Outcome just points to attempted regime change. May take on different forms when they see signs of Iran's military arsenal being depleted or local security forces/government losing control of situation on ground

This is going to go into the summer in my opinion
Click to expand...
Eid Mubarak brother
 
kobra said:
Yes despite sanctions iran never charged for Hormuz..

They should charge moving forward to cover for war loses.

Suez, Panama, Kiel, Welland, Bhosporus, Malacca etc are all paid..
Click to expand...
If they start to charge, the ships will srart to sail closer to UAE cost
 
The depletion of air defense missiles in the Gulf and Israel is immense. France lost 100 MICA missiles in a week trying to shoot down aircraft like the Shahed 136. Kuwait has exhausted its ASPIDE and AIM-7M missiles, as have the UAE, Oman, and Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia has exhausted its Crotale short-range missiles, and all of them have requested missiles from various countries, including China, Greece, and Egypt. France, for example, produces 70 MICA missiles annually, and its stockpile does not exceed 500.

The Iranian side cannot strike Israeli air bases because disabling one would require 70-120 ballistic missiles. However, they have important targets such as the Ashdod refinery, desalination plants, and power stations. Destroying these would return the Jews to the pre-occupation status quo in Palestine, and this is the crucial point. Europe, and even America, will gradually consider Israel a failed project and will allow its elimination within a reasonable timeframe. Therefore, their plans include occupying parts of Lebanon and Syria, up to Damascus, and then parts of Türkiye and Egypt. Israel's entry into Damascus will be at its weakest point, making it vulnerable to attack and destruction from the south. Therefore, depleting Israel's capabilities and destroying its infrastructure is crucial; the Gulf states will inevitably capitulate.
 
Iran can try going into Iraq > Kuwait + Saudi Arabia

It can even try moving proxies. That would be risky and costly.

They may have paraglider capability for islands in the Gulf but logistically doesn't seem possible to pull off with current US deployment+ defensive capabilities of local nations

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 2 more.
    • Total: 92 (members: 13, guests: 79)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top