Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is related to the international status and military strength of each country.I agree Iran as it stands now was going to be attacked either way. I’m talking about the entire ideological framework of Iran dating from the 70s. Things could have been very different.
Many underground facilities are a very expensive option not available to poor countries.Last 35 odd years, ever since Gulf War 1 in 1992, global military doctrine has been heavily based on the assumption that if you have air superiority in a conventional war (Vietnam and Afghanistan do not count), you will win. This was the case in Iraq in 1991, Balkan Wars, etc.
Iran has turned its weakness in this area into a strength. It has obviously used a massive underground network to let it's enemy exhaust it's airpower and then use underground missiles to fight back.
No country has ever done this before, think North Korea has geared up for this too. Basically both countries know they cannot compete for air superiority in a war so did not bother wasting resources. They went for massive underground missile network. Guess this can only work if you are able to accept some massive damage from bombing, however, Iran seems to be absorbing everything thrown at it.
I think we are now seeing a big change in the nature of war. The most powerful air force in the Middle East, with over 400 very modern jets, the best anti missile defences, nukes etc cannot stop missiles hitting it all over the place.
Hopefully Pak Mil is learning lessons here....
Third Israeli F-16 fighter
50 minutes ago
US or Israeli submarine ?
Launched from northern Cyprus . Where is Turkish Navy here ?