Considering how IRGC seems have game theoried all possible outcomes (Tit-for-Tat strikes, Economical depletion of ABM/AD, A2/AD of S of H etc), I feel we might see some kind of Tit-for-Tat from them for any Island landing, instead of fighting enemy head on. I have seen all wars happening from Persian Gulf I and II, Yugoslavia, Afghan, Syria, Ukraine ... I have never seen the kind of asymmetric tactics IRGC deploys against superpowers, they always avoid the domain enemy puts in front of them and goes through some other route to inflict some other kind of pain or chokehold. Others I have listed had military but they tried to take the hyperpowers head on, challenging them at sea, air etc.