Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Ok, the USS Lincoln got hit by Iranian missiles and at least 1 US sailor was killed (probably more). The aircraft carrier made 90 degrees evasive manouvres, so they probably lost some jets as well. Iran also shot down a F-18 jet 24 hours ago, so this is the main reason why they assassinated the IRGC navy commander this morning.


Then you woke up and said it was all a dream.


This is what a US carrier looks like when it does evasive maneuvers
1774541717916.png

And yes it can do it with a full deck.
 
Bin Laden for a decade evaded US after 9/11 because he went electronic quiet he even ordered his men to do the same only when one of his men decided to make a call was the US able to take him out .

The person identified Bin Laden’s runner (courier) and U.S. intelligence tracked him to the compound. That’s how U.S. finds people - treachery and greed. They got Maduro because his driver and bodyguard gave him up.

And Bin Laden sitting in a destitute compound for years while his terrorist organization was hunted to the ends of the earth is not a flex. He was no longer running things.

So there is a point where the trade off for ultimate reclusive nature and managing a battlefield becomes a negative.
 
That is not true and also a contradiction itself. If you don´t know it can´t be close to zero.

It have been published here by @Michael that China has been helping with near time real data from very well known civilian companies and also serving raw materials like "fertilizers", "2 time engines" and other materials to Islamic Republic.

Keep sealed lips it is much more wise than boasting diarrea in X like Trump. By the way, why nobody of the semi-public press media from Islamic republic have shown concern about Chinese help?. Guess why...
A more rigorous and objective statement:

The current interactions between China and Iran consist of "normal" commercial trade cooperation within the "civilian sphere." As for what transpires after these "normal, civilian goods" enter Iran, China is unable to conduct in-depth tracking or oversight.

Regarding dual-use products, the purchasing party is required to submit an End-User Statement; such products must not be utilized for military purposes. If any concerned party objects to the normal, civilian-sector trade cooperation between China and Iran—specifically on the grounds that Iran is diverting Chinese civilian goods for military use—they are invited to submit a formal report to the Chinese government. The Chinese government will conduct a rigorous review of any such matters. (Typically, this process is highly time-consuming, and the concerned party is required to submit precise evidence that is rigorous in nature and fully compliant with the stipulations of Chinese law.)

Under China's current national policy, China does not supply "military weaponry" to belligerent parties during times of armed conflict.
 
Ukrainian kids taking arms to fight Russians is acceptable and heroic per western standards

Iranian kids taking arms to fight Americans is child terrorism and illegal per western standards
Looks like the west's sun with all its double standards is about to set.
 
Did you know Rouhani after the Revolution met with Israeli and U.S. officials to try to secure a approach?

Did you also know Rouhani was the lead negotiator in 2003 Nuclear conflict with Bush administration and offered to give up the nuclear enrichment in exchange for 100 centrifuges (1 cascade) as a token gesture for nuclear research?
Yes, I am well aware of both of those facts. Rouhani was Iran's lead negotiator with the Westerners for a long time.

He also was a lead negotiator during the Iran-Contra affair.

The treaty he signed with E3 in 2004 was a replica of the JCPOA, even worse because Iran hadn't mastered the nuclear fuel cycle and centrifuge technology yet. Iran was not allowed to have a single industrial centrifuge, except for miniscule academic research under supervision. In return, he received only promises from the Europeans, none of which were ever fulfilled. And then the exact same thing happened again in the JCPOA, except that this time it was with P5+1.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top