Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

MH.Yang said:
Due to their anti American stance, Chinese people generally support Iran, and because of the Tajik people who have supported the Chinese central government for thousands of years, Chinese people also generally have a favorable impression of Shia Islam.

From the bottom of their hearts, Chinese people are willing to see Iran possess nuclear weapons, but China will never openly support Iran's possession of nuclear weapons, and may even oppose Iran's possession of nuclear weapons. You need to realize that the vast majority of countries in this world do not want to see other countries possessing nuclear weapons, and prohibiting nuclear proliferation on a global scale is absolutely politically correct. China cannot be an enemy for Iran and two hundred other countries.

And do you really believe that nuclear weapons can prevent the invasion of Iran by the United States and Israel? Do you really think American elites care about the lives of American soldiers? You should see the bodies of Americans who froze to death on American streets. Do American elites care about their lives?

Once Iran possesses nuclear weapons, the United States and Israel will inevitably invade Iran at all costs, and Iran will also face a diplomatic impasse of global isolation. Your allies will also significantly reduce their aid due to political correctness.
Click to expand...

Iran has shown it prioritizes sovereignty and justice over the number of states calling for its capitulation. Whether two hundred or two hundred and one makes little difference from Iran's perspective. Moreover, this number is likely exaggerated in light of recent events. When a nuclear armed nation cautions a historically rooted state like Iran against pursuing similar capabilities, it raises questions about the consistency and intent behind that stance.

At this point a ground invasion seems imminent, making hypotheticals about nuclear deterrence largely irrelevant.

Major powers tend to act expediently, if not opportunistically. This is well understood in Tehran. As a result, any support extended to Iran is understood to be driven by the interests of these allies (perhaps more accurately described as strategic partners) rather than by principle or goodwill.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
HAIDER said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

This is kinda like how Biden was upset with Bibi at the height of genocide in Gaza but was providing him all the 2000 lbs bombs he needed to kill children by the thousands...Bull fracking sheet...goy slaves of zionist master race have no such luxuries.....
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
ShapurII said:
Yeah, I do remember some of the military actions that Obama took. But declaring all-out war on another country? I can't remember any.

Trump declared war on Iran, attempted regime change and is discussing sending troops to Iran for invasion. I cannot remember anything remotely similar to this done by Obama.
Click to expand...
Why should the same people who opted twice in favour of Israel and Trump suddenly vote against the war on Iran in a third voting?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Magi said:
Iran has shown it prioritizes sovereignty and justice over the number of states calling for its capitulation. Whether two hundred or two hundred and one makes little difference from Iran's perspective. Moreover, this number is likely exaggerated in light of recent events. When a nuclear armed nation cautions a historically rooted state like Iran against pursuing similar capabilities, it raises questions about the consistency and intent behind that stance.

At this point a ground invasion seems imminent, making hypotheticals about nuclear deterrence largely irrelevant.

Major powers tend to act expediently, if not opportunistically. This is well understood in Tehran. As a result, any support extended to Iran is understood to be driven by the interests of these allies (perhaps more accurately described as strategic partners) rather than by principle or goodwill.
Click to expand...
Let's use deconstruction to analyze this problem.
Iran is facing invasions from Israel and the United States, with a focus on the United States. Without the United States, Israel would soon be destroyed.
Don't try to sow discord between the United States and Israel. The alliance between the two countries appears to be between Jews and evangelical Christians, but the real relationship is actually the underlying operating law of capital.
So the core of Iran's problem lies with the United States. Where is the core of the problem in the United States? First of all, don't be fooled by the military strength of the United States. In fact, the military strength of the United States has long been eroded to the point where it is not the biggest threat. The financial strength of the United States is actually rapidly deteriorating, and it is no longer as strong as it appears. The true strength of the United States lies in the procedural justice it has brought to maintaining international order for decades, the supporters it gained by defeating the USSR, and its numerous allies.
And all of this is something Iran has a chance to destroy. As long as the United States loses its legitimacy and allies in maintaining international order, stronger countries will immediately attack and defeat it.
Now it is the United States and Israel that have provoked the Iran War, and the United States also supports Israel's genocide against Palestine. Global public opinion is blaming these two countries. The frequent occurrence of a 200:2 voting result in the United Nations is proof. At this time, Iran's blockade of the strait is for survival and to resist aggression. It is a just act that can be understood and accepted by the world. So now the anger of people around the world towards economic damage is directed towards the United States and Israel. If Iran only needs to continue the war and prolong the blockade of the strait, then the soft power and international influence of the United States will continue to be damaged. This is the real blow to the core power of the United States.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 100 (members: 6, guests: 94)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top