Taimoor
Elite Member
well looks like the messaging is at least being controlled by external parties...
What do you expect from a boot polisher? He has to F it up at some point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well looks like the messaging is at least being controlled by external parties...
I also don't want to go too deep into this..I don’t want to get much into this. I just found it funny. But wouldn’t the title of a draft written by a Pakistani for Pakistan’s PM read «PMs statement on x» rather than «Pakistans PMs statement on x?»
But never the less a much needed sigh of relief, i really hope that both countries get what they want from this deal and ceasefire hold.Indeed brother.. indeed!
Iran is honorably trying to safeguard the territorial integrity of Lebanon. This is just a 2 week ceasefire and the Iranians seem to be agreeing to that, instead of the previous 6 week proposal, which would allow the Americans/Israelis to significantly buttress up their assault forces.
The 2 weeks are to give the 'diplomacy' a truly last chance. But Iran will retain the same firepower and the ability to block the Strait after two weeks as it does now; that must be understood.
I think Iran was already operating from position of strength and they maintained a lot of leverage. Being responsible for making major oil refineries of the world run dry is a huge leverage.At least as per the message, the 10 points came form Iran, so this does not seem like Iran is the one surrendering if the points were presented by them.
From tonight onwards, this would have turned into a war of attrition. No gain, no benefits, no lead for anyone at all. Iran would not have gained any additional position of strength from here onwards.
Iran will at this time, be able to negotiate form a good position of power, Hormuz will still be in Iran's grasp, Iran still has Missiles, Forces and a lot of Oil infra. Nothing wrong with moving onto negotiations from here on.
Ok so let's assume, as you are implying surreptitiously, that it was dictated by the Americans.I don’t want to get much into this. I just found it funny. But wouldn’t the title of a draft written by a Pakistani for Pakistan’s PM read «PMs statement on x» rather than «Pakistans PMs statement on x?»
But then if they do the cease fire ends, and what do you imagine can massively mobilise in two weeks?They lost a couple of helicopters and two C-130s. Zero killed in action! Do you get it? Zero US soldiers died.
They are going to launch an all-out ground invasion if Iran doesn't surrender to their terms. That's what this ceasefire is all about, to prepare for that while controlling oil prices and preventing an economic disaster.
It was written by a native Pakistani. No doubt about it. Read the syntax and grammar.Ok so let's assume, as you are implying surreptitiously, that it was dictated by the Americans.
If that is the case then maybe Iran should have refused. It is as simple as that. Don't shoot the messenger. If Iran and Iranians don't like the message, say no and deal with the repercussions.
What I find "funny" is this wanting to have your cake and eat it too. Pakistan did what it could to pull the countries back from the brink.