codeforfood
Registered Member
Look at these three points and think of what was being negotiated and agreed before this conflict before Iran's leadership was decapitated. What was the agreement signed with Iran by Obama govt.It has been widely reported that the three conditions for ending hostilities and proceed towards some normalization are:
1. No nukes
2. Strait of Hormuz remains same as before
3. No support for Hezbollah etc. groups.
Anything else might have been peripheral. It is really simple in terms of goals. No confusion at all. But all three are core anathema for Iran. That is why there will not be an agreement now or later. Unless something dramatic happens.
They agreed and signed. Iran even had a religious decree that stopped them from building any nukes(which essentially worked against their interests).
As for hormuz, we dug that hole for ourselves not Iran by attacking them without any provocation.
If we had the ability to provide assurance that Israel's expansionist policy can be contained and no further attacks will be carried out on Iran, I am sure there could have been a negotiated settlement for Hezbollah's role.
In all honesty we did not want to truly resolve this conflict, that's why we keep moving
goal posts.
We can continue to try to find a moral basis or some other justification for what we started. There isn't really one that exist other than the cold hard reality that we have the powers and means to do these type of things so we go start these conflicts and then find a justification later.
Last edited:






