Pakistan had to get loans from Saudi/Qatar to pay back its loan to the UAE, and then deployed a defensive force to Saudi. So I am not seeing any substantial difference from Egypt which also deployed a defensive force to UAE, a country on which it depends on financially.
Both Egypt and Pakistan are army dictatorships from the 1950s, with huge military business empires. The Egyptian arrangement, where Sadat sold out the Palestinians and gained financial aid and political support for army rule in perpetuity, is something Pakistani jernails have dreamed of for generations.
People are allowed to disagree with your viewpoint. Thanks.
Back to topic.